Is Britain a force for good? Investigating British citizens’ narrative understanding of war

References

• Abbott, H.P., 2008. The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816932
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. and Preiss, R., 1997. Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication research reports, 14 (2), 125–131.10.1080/08824099709388654
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., 2006. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniades, A., Miskimmon, A., and O’Loughlin, B., 2010. Great power politics and strategic narratives, CGPE, No. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Archetti, C., 2013. Understanding terrorism in the age of global media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137291387
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle, 1996. Poetics. New York: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Asari, E.-M., Halikiopoulou, D., and Mock, S., 2008. British national identity and the dilemmas of multiculturalism. Nationalism and ethnic politics, 14 (1), 1–28.10.1080/13537110701872444
   Google Scholar
• Bal, M., 2009. Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. and Duisit, L., 1975. An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New literary history, 6 (2), 237–272.10.2307/468419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. and Hastings, S., 2013. Distortions of collective memory: how groups flatter and deceive themselves. In: J. Pennebaker, D. Paez, and B. Rime, eds. Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 277–294.
   Google Scholar
• Baynham, M., 2006. Narratives in space and time: beyond ‘Backdrop’ accounts of narrative orientation. Narrative inquiry, 13 (2), 347–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., 2014. Parameters of a national biography. European journal of international relations, 20 (1), 262–288.10.1177/1354066112445290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, D.L., et al., 2012. Narrative landmines: rumors, Islamist extremism, and the struggle for strategic influence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmeier, Jens, 2000. Autobiographical time. Narrative inquiry, 10 (1), 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J., 1987. Life as narrative. Social research, 54 (1), 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J., 1991. The narrative construction of reality. Critical inquiry, 18 (1), 1–21.10.1086/448619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2012. Social research methods. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K., 1969. A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carranza, I., 1998. Low-narrativity narratives and argumentation. Narrative inquiry, 8 (2), 287–317.10.1075/ni.8.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casebeer, W. and Russell, J., 2005. Storytelling and terrorism: towards a comprehensive ‘Counter-Narrative Strategy’. Strategic insights, 4 (3), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 2011. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cawkwell, T., 2015. UK communication strategies for Afghanistan, 2001–2014. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corman, S., et al., 2013. Narrating the exit from Afghanistan. Tempe, AZ: Center for Strategic Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S., 2012. Securitizing Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139104142
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W., 1992. A place for stories: nature, history, and narrative. The journal of American history, 78 (4), 1347–1376.10.2307/2079346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., 2004. Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209502
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. and Johns, R., 2010. British public attitudes about international affairs. The role of the FCO in UK government inquiry. Available from: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-062-23-1952/outputs/Read/4a8a5ef5-16ca-40ba-8b1b-0983464a6365 [Accessed 23 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J.E., 2002. Stories of change: narrative and social movements. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fina, A., 2003. Crossing borders: time, space, and disorientation in narrative. Narrative inquiry, 13 (2), 367–391.10.1075/ni.13.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fina, A., 2009. Narratives in interview – the case of accounts: for an interactional approach to narrative genres. Narrative inquiry, 19 (2), 233–258.10.1075/ni.19.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A., 2012. Analyzing narrative: discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, B., Dimitriu, G., and Ringsmose, R., eds., 2015. Strategic narratives, public opinion and war: winning domestic support for the Afghan war. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, A.C., et al., 2010. ‘Pretty Prudent’ or rhetorically responsive? The American public’s support for military action. Political research quarterly, 63 (1), 83–96.10.1177/1065912908327230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W., 1984. Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Communication monographs, 51 (1), 1–22.10.1080/03637758409390180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A., 1995. The wounded storyteller. London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226260037.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. 2006. The transformation of strategic affairs. Adelphi papers, No. 379. International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L., 2012. Introduction: strategies, stories and scripts. In: L. Freedman and J. Michaels, eds. Scripting Middle East leaders: the impact of leadership perceptions on US and UK foreign policy. New York: Bloomsbury, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L., 2013. Strategy: a history. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A. and Goutsos, D., 2000. Revisiting discourse boundaries: the narrative and non-narrative modes. Text-interdisciplinary journal for the study of discourse, 20 (1), 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. and Strauss, A., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, J., 2015. Hilary Benn launches shock and awe campaign in Syria debate. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/dec/03/syria-debate-hilary-benn-launches-shock-and-awe-campaign-against-labour [Accessed 7 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, J., Corman, S., and Goodall, H.L., 2011. Master narratives of Islamist extremism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-11723-5
   Google Scholar
• Haven, K., 2007. Story proof: the science behind the startling power of story. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, L., et al., 2014. Are the armed forces understood and supported by the public? A view from the United Kingdom. Armed forces & society, 41 (4), 688–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, A., 2011. The “War on Terror” narrative. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759590.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, M., 2006. Towards a conceptual history of narrative. Studies across disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, 1, 20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R., 2000. Narrative, civil society and public culture. In: M. Andrews, et al., eds. Lines of narrative. London: Routledge, 18–35.10.4324/9780203471005
   Google Scholar
• Johns, R., et al., 2012. Foreign policy attitudes and support for war among the British public ESRC end of award report, RES-062-23-1952-A. Swindon: ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M.D. and McBeth, M.K., 2010. A narrative policy framework: clear enough to be wrong? Policy studies journal, 38 (2), 329–353.10.1111/(ISSN)1541-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M., et al., 2007. Human security: a new strategic narrative for Europe. International affairs, 83 (2), 273–288.10.1111/inta.2007.83.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong, Y.F., 1992. Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., Niblett, R., and Raines, T., 2012. Hard choices ahead: the Chatham House–YouGov survey 2012: British attitudes towards the UK’s international priorities. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Kopfman, J., et al., 1998. Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of applied communication research, 26 (3), 279–300.10.1080/00909889809365508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kralova, S., 2014. Crimea seen as ‘Hitler-style’ land grab. BBC News. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26488652 [Accessed 7 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, R., 2015. Narrative and the making of US national security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316218969
   Google Scholar
• Kull, S. and Destler, I., 1999. Misreading the public: the myth of a new isolationism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leichter, D., 2012. Collective identity and collective memory in the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Ricoeur studies, 3 (1), 114–131.10.5195/errs.2012.125
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M., 2009. The uses and abuses of history. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. and Huberman, M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2010. Defence plan 2010–2014. London: Stationery Office. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27163/Defence_Plan_2010_2014.pdf [Accessed 23 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., and Roselle, Laura, 2013. Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mludzinski, T., 2013. The Brits aren’t coming: Syria and the legacy of Iraq. The Ispsos MORI Almanac. London: Ipsos MORI.
   Google Scholar
• Morefield, J., 2014. Empires without imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199387328.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ó’Tuathail, G., 2002. Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning: the case of the United States’ response to the war in Bosnia. Political geography, 21 (5), 601–628.10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, M., 2002. Warrior nation: images of war in British popular culture, 1850–2000. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J., Smith-Walter, A., and Peterson, H., 2014. Research design and the narrative policy framework. In: M.D. Jones, E.A. Shanahan, and M.K. McBeth, eds. The science of stories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 27–44.10.1057/9781137485861
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D., 1988. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. and Mykleby, M. [Mr. Y], 2011. A national strategic narrative. Woodrow Wilson Centre for International Scholars. Available from: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/A%20National%20Strategic%20Narrative.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Raines, T., 2015. Internationalism or isolationism? The Chatham House–YouGov survey: British attitudes towards the UK’s international priorities. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Reifler, J., et al., 2012. Prudence, principle and minimal heuristics: British public opinion toward the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya. The British journal of politics & international relations, 16 (1), 28–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P., 1990. Time and narrative, volume 1, trans. K. McLaughlin and D. Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C.K., 1990. Strategic uses of narrative in the presentation of self and illness: a research note. Social science & medicine, 30 (11), 1195–1200.10.1016/0277-9536(90)90259-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C.K., 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E., 1996. On the ontological status of the state. European journal of international relations, 2 (4), 439–466.10.1177/1354066196002004002
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J. and Børgesen, B.K., 2011. Shaping public attitudes towards the deployment of military power: NATO, Afghanistan and the use of strategic narratives. European security, 20 (4), 505–528.10.1080/09662839.2011.617368
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N., 2008. Trident and British identity: letting go of nuclear weapons. Bradford: Bradford Disarmament Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., et al., eds., 2013. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., 2007. A history of the English-speaking peoples since 1900. London: Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. and Eyal, J., 2014. Of tails and dogs: public support and elite opinion. In: A. Johnson, ed. Wars in peace: British military operations since 1991. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, 161–190.
   Google Scholar
• Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., and O’Loughlin, B., 2014. Strategic narrative: a new means to understand soft power. Media, war and conflict, 7 (1), 70–84.10.1177/1750635213516696
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., 2005. On the theoretical foundations of transmedial narratology. In: J.C. Meister, T. Kindt, and W. Schernus, eds. Narratology beyond literary criticism: mediality, disciplinarity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1–24.10.1515/nar
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, C., 2010. Storytelling: bewitching the modern mind, trans. D. Macey. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E., 2012. War from the ground up: twenty-first century combat as politics. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Spector-Mersel, G., 2011. Mechanisms of selection in claiming narrative identities: a model for interpreting narratives. Qualitative inquiry, 17 (2), 172–185.10.1177/1077800410393885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector-Mersel, G., 2014a. ‘I Was… Until… Since Then…’: exploring the mechanisms of selection in a tragic narrative. Narrative works, 4 (1), 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Spector-Mersel, G., 2014b. Multiplicity and commonality in narrative interpretation. Narrative works, 4 (1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B.J., 2007. Ontological security in international relations: self-identity and the IR state. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H., 2009. The strategic gap in British defence policy. Survival, 51 (4), 49–70.10.1080/00396330903168840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C. and Yu, F., 2007. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research, 1 (1), 77–100.10.1177/2345678906292430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, T., 1977. The poetics of prose. Paris: Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, P., 2010. Going to war: British debates from Wilberforce to Blair. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vlahos, M., 2006. The long war: a self-fulfilling prophecy of protracted conflict-and defeat. Available from: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-long-war-a-self-fulfilling-prophecy-of-protractedconflict-and-defeat-1061 [Accessed 20 June 2014].
   Google Scholar