1,342
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The underlying causes of military outsourcing in the USA and UK: bridging the persistent gap between ends, ways and means since the beginning of the Cold War

Pages 135-155 | Received 24 Sep 2016, Accepted 10 Feb 2017, Published online: 28 Feb 2017

References

  • Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M.C., 2011. Security beyond the state: private security in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Adam, S. and Kriesi, H., 2007. The network approach. In: P.A. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 129–154.
  • Avant, D.D., 2005. The market for force: the consequences of privatizing security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490866
  • Bacevich, A.J., 2002. American empire: the realities and consequences of U.S. diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bacevich, A.J., 2007. Introduction. In: A.J. Bacevich, ed. The long war: a new history of U.S. national security policy since world war II. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, vii–xiv.
  • Baylis, J., 1986. The evolution of British defence policy, 1945–1986. In: M. Edmonds, ed. The defence equation: British military systems. policy, planning and performance. London: Brassey’s Defence Publishers, 19–33.
  • Berndtsson, J., 2014. Realizing the “market-state”? Military transformation and security outsourcing in Sweden. International journal, 69 (4), 542–558.10.1177/0020702014542813
  • Bobbitt, P., 2003. The shield of Achilles: war, peace and the course of history. London: Penguin Books.
  • Broadbent, Sir E., 1988. The military and government: from Macmillan to Heseltine. Foreword by Harold Macmillan, Preface by David Bolton. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-09245-1
  • Coker, C., 2002. Globalisation and insecurity in the twenty-first century: NATO and the management of risk. Adelphi Paper 345. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, S., Dorman, A., Rees, W. and Uttley, M., 2001. Britain and defence 1945–2000: a policy re-evaluation. Harlow: Longman.
  • Cusumano, E., 2016. Bridging the gap: mobilisation constraints and contractor support to US and UK military operations. Journal of strategic studies, 39 (1), 94–119.
  • Downes, C., 2010. Unintentional militarism: over-reliance on military methods and mindsets in US national security and its consequences. Defense & security analysis, 26 (4), 371–385.10.1080/14751798.2010.534646
  • Dunigan, M. and Petersohn, U., eds., 2015. Markets for force: privatization of security across world regions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Edmonds, M., 1986. Planning Britain’s defence, 1945–85: capability, credibility and the problem of time. In: M. Edmonds, ed. The defence equation: British military systems. Policy, planning and performance. London: Brassey’s Defence Publishers, 1–18.
  • Erbel, M., 2014. Contractors and defence policy-making: examining the causes, process, and future of military outsourcing. Thesis (PhD). King’s College London.
  • Erbel, M., 2016. The politics of outsourcing military support services. In: J. Berndtsson and C. Kinsey, eds. The Routledge research companion to security outsourcing. Abingdon: Routledge, 231–240.
  • Hartley, K., 1997. The cold war, great-power traditions and military posture: determinants of British defence expenditure after 1945. Defence and peace economics, 8 (1), 17–35.10.1080/10430719708404867
  • Hartley, K., 2011. The economics of defence policy: a new perspective. London: Routledge.
  • Hewes, J.E., 1975. From Root to McNamara: army organization and administration, 1900–1963. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, U.S. Army.
  • Homolar, A., 2011. How to last alone at the top: US strategic planning for the unipolar era. Journal of strategic studies, 34 (2), 189–217.10.1080/01402390.2011.559024
  • Huntington, S.P., 1957. The soldier and the state: the theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Kinsey, C., 2009a. Private contractors and the reconstruction of Iraq: transforming military logistics. London: Routledge.
  • Kinsey, C., 2009b. The transformation of war: the rise of private contractors. The Emirates Occasional Papers 72. Abu Dhabi: The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research.
  • Krahmann, E., 2010. States, citizens and the privatization of security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139042727
  • Kruck, A., 2013. Theorising the use of private military and security companies: a synthetic perspective. Journal of international relations and development, 17 (1), 112–141.
  • Lake, D.R., 2012. Technology, qualitative superiority, and the overstretched American military. Strategic studies quarterly, 6 (4), 71–99.
  • Laurent, P., 1991. The costs of defence. In: S. Croft, ed. British security policy: the Thatcher years and the end of the cold war. London: Harper Collins Academic, 88–103.
  • Leander, A., 2006. Eroding state authority? Private military companies and the legitimate use of force. Catanzaro: Rubbettino.
  • McCourt, D.M., 2014. Has Britain found its role? Survival, 56 (2), 159–178.10.1080/00396338.2014.901746
  • McIntosh, M., 1990. Managing Britain’s defence. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-10535-9
  • McIntosh, M., 1992. Defence procurement policy: the way ahead. The RUSI journal, 137 (5), 71–75.10.1080/03071849208445644
  • Mears, G.H. and Kim, T., 1994. Logistics: the way ahead. Joint force quarterly, 4, 38–44.
  • Mittelstadt, J., 2013. The neoliberal army: contracting out soldier and family support in the late twentieth century. Paper Presented at the Political History Seminar, 7 March 2013. Princeton, NJ: Department of History, Princeton University.
  • Mohlin, M., 2012. The strategic use of military contractors: American commercial military service providers in Bosnia and Liberia: 1995–2009. Strategian tutkimuksia. Julkaisusarja 1 Strategic research. Series 1, no. 30. Helsinki: Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu, Strategian laitos.
  • NATO, n.d. NSPA – NATO Support agency [online]. Available from: http://www.nspa.nato.int/en/index.htm [Accessed 12 Apr 2014].
  • Novak, W.J., 2009. Public-private governance: a historical introduction. In: J. Freeman and M. Minow, eds. Government by contract: outsourcing and American democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 23–40.
  • Ovendale, R., ed., 1994. British defence policy since 1945. Documents in contemporary history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Peters, H.M., Schwartz, M., and Kapp, L., 2015. Department of defense contractor and troop levels in Iraq and Afghanistan: 2007–2015. Congressional research service, R44116.
  • Petersohn, U., 2011. Military privatisation: changing the military-civil force mix. European political science, 10 (2), 146–156.10.1057/eps.2011.3
  • Pettyjohn, S.L., 2012. U.S. global defense posture, 1783–2011. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Posen, B.R., 2003. Command of the commons: the military foundation of U.S. hegemony. International security, 28 (1), 5–46.10.1162/016228803322427965
  • Schwartz, M. and Swain, J., 2011. Department of defense contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq: background and analysis. Congressional research service, R40764.
  • Singer, P.W., 2008. Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry. Upd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Stewart, R.W., general ed., 2005. American military history: the United States army in a global era, 1917–2003. Vol. II. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, United States Army.
  • Taylor, T., 2004. Contractors on deployed operations and equipment support. Defence studies, 4 (2), 184–198.10.1080/1470243042000325896
  • Terriff, T. and Osinga, F., 2010. Conclusion: the diffusion of military transformation to European militaries. In: T. Farrell, T. Terriff, and F. Osinga, eds. A transformation gap: American innovations and European military change. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 187–210.10.11126/stanford/9780804763776.001.0001
  • Thorn, D.G., 1986. Pricing and negotiating defence contracts. London: Longman.
  • UK Army, 2012. Transforming the British military: modernising to face an unpredictable future [online]. Available from: http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/Army2020_brochure.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2012].
  • UK Government, 2010. Securing Britain in an age of uncertainty: the strategic defence and security review. London: The Stationery Office.
  • UK Ministry of Defence, 2001. Policy paper no. 4: defence acquisition. London: UK Ministry of Defence.
  • UK Ministry of Defence, 2010. Contractor support to operations. Tiger team final report.
  • UK Ministry of Defence, 2012. National security through technology: technology, equipment, and support for UK defence and security. London: The Stationery Office (Cm 8278).
  • UK Royal Air Force, n.d. Future strategic tanker aircraft [online]. Available from: http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/futurestrategictankeraircraft.cfm [Accessed 8 August 2015].
  • U.S. Army, 1985. Army Regulation 700-137: Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOCGAP): AR 700-137.
  • U.S. Congress, 2013. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013: H.R. 4310.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 1995. Directions for defense: report of the commission on roles and missions of the armed forces. Arlington, VA: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 1996. Report of the defense science task force on outsourcing and privatization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 1997. Report of the quadrennial defense review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2001. Report of the quadrennial defense review. NA: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2010a. Quadrennial defense review report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2010b. Task group on assessing the defense industrial base: report to the secretary of defense, Report FY10-05. Washington, DC.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2010c. Joint concept for logistics.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2011. Task group on a culture of savings. Implementing behavior change in DoD: Report to the secretary of defense, Report FY11-01.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, 2012. Sustaining U.S. global leadership: priorities for 21st century defense. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
  • U.S. Department of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, 2009. In-sourcing contracted services – implementation guidance [online]. Available from: http://prhome.defense.gov/rfm/TFPRQ/docs/DepSecDef%20Memo%20In-sourcing%20Contracted%20Services-Implementation%20Guidance%20(28%20May%2009)%20(OSD%2005339-09).pdf [Accessed 3 March 2013].
  • Uttley, M., 2005. Contractors on deployed military operations: United Kingdom policy and doctrine. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
  • van Apeldoorn, B. and de Graaff, N., 2014. Corporate elite networks and US post-cold war grand strategy from Clinton to Obama. European journal of international relations, 20 (1), 29–55.10.1177/1354066111433895
  • Voß, K., 2016. Plausibly deniable: mercenaries in US covert interventions during the cold war, 1964–1987. Cold war history, 16 (1), 37–60.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.