British and German initiatives for defence cooperation: the Joint Expeditionary Force and the Framework Nations Concept

References

• Allers, R., 2016. The framework nation: can Germany lead on security? International affairs, 92 (5), 1167–1187.10.1111/1468-2346.12702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, R. and Tamnes, R., 2014. Just do it: bilateral and minilateral cooperation to invigorate European security. In: R. Allers, C. Masala and R. Tamnes, eds. Common or divided security? German and Norwegian perspectives on Euro-Atlantic security. Bern: Peter Lang, 281–298.10.3726/978-3-653-03995-5
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M., 2016. Militärische Zusammenarbeit: Deutschland und Holland werden Waffenbrüder [Military cooperation: Germany and Holland become brothers-in-arms]. Spiegel Online [online]. Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/bundeswehr-zusammenschluss-mit-niederlaendischer-armee-a-1075731.html [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Binnendijk, H. and Kugler, R., 2002. Transforming European forces. Survival, 44 (3), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, G., 2015. UK defence policy 1957–2015: the illusion of choice. Defence studies, 15 (2), 85–104.10.1080/14702436.2015.1033849
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, Murray. 2015a. Britain gets cold shoulder with Canada’s talk of joining NATO force. The Globe and Mail, 11 June [online]. Available from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/britain-gets-cold-shoulder-with-canadas-talk-of-joining-nato-force/article24911492/ [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, Murray. 2015b. Canada shies away from British-led NATO-UN emergency force. The Canadian Press, 9 Jan [online]. Available from: http://www.therecord.com/news-story/5251358-canada-shies-away-from-british-led-nato-un-emergency-force/ [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R.N., Wilson, D.M., and Lightfoot, J., 2012. Anchoring the alliance. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Campion-Smith, B. 2014. NATO adopts military reform, rapid-response team to counter Russia threat. Toronto Star, 5 Sep [online]. Available from: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/09/05/nato_adopts_military_reform_rapidresponse_team_to_counter_russia_threat.html [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Carver, M., 1983. Getting defence priorities right. In: John Baylis, ed. Alternative approaches to British defence policy. London: Macmillan Press, 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W.K., 2001. Waging modern war: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the future of combat. Oxford: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Review and Safeguarding of Parliamentary Rights regarding Mandates for Bundeswehr Missions Abroad, 2015a. Final report by the Commission. Berlin: German Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Review and Safeguarding of Parliamentary Rights regarding Mandates for Bundeswehr Missions Abroad, 2015b. Appendix 10: hearing before the Commission, Lieutenant General Heinrich Brauß. Final report by the Commission. Berlin: German Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on the Review and Safeguarding of Parliamentary Rights regarding Mandates for Bundeswehr Missions Abroad, 2015c. Appendix 12: hearing before the Commission, Ambassador Martin Erdmann. Final report by the Commission. Berlin: German Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• de Maizière, T., 2013. Speech by the Federal Minister of Defense, Dr. Thomas de Maizière, on the Occasion of the 49th Munich Security Conference. Berlin: German MoD, 1 February.
   Google Scholar
• Demmer, U. and Schult, C., 2012. Rache für Libyen [Revenge for Libya]. Der Spiegel.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel, 2013. Militärbündnis: Reform stärkt Deutschlands Rolle in der Nato [Military alliance: Reform strenghtens Germany’s role in NATO]. Spiegel Online [online]. Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/nato-reform-deutschland-untermauert-fuehrungsanspruch-in-der-nato-a-929490.html [Accessed 13 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Diesen, S., 2013. Towards an affordable European defence and security policy? The case for extensive European force integration. In: Janne Haaland Matlarty and Magnus Petersson, eds. NATO’s European allies: military capability and political will. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• EDD (Europe Diplomacy & Defence), 2013. NATO/Ministerial: Germany tables new framework nation concept. Europe Diplomacy & Defence: The Agence Europe Bulletin on ESDP and NATO.
   Google Scholar
• EDD, 2014. NATO/Ministerial: NATO takes on German framework nation concept. Europe Diplomacy & Defence: The Agence Europe Bulletin on ESDP and NATO.
   Google Scholar
• Ek, C., 2007. NATO’s prague capabilities commitment. CRS report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Erlanger, S., 2016. After ‘Brexit,’ E.U. revives idea of its own joint military command. The New York Times, 22 Sep.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Commission on Norwegian Security and Defence Policy, 2015. Unified effort. Oslo: Norwegian MoD.
   Google Scholar
• FAZ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung), 2015. Deutschland und Polen tauschen Bataillone aus [Germany and Poland exchange battalions]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 7 March.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, D.J., 2014. Western European armed forces and the modernisation agenda: following or falling behind? Defence studies, 14 (4), 394–413.10.1080/14702436.2014.961356
   Google Scholar
• Gates, R.M., 2011. The security and defense agenda (future of NATO). Speech delivered by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, 11 June, 2011, in Brussels, Belgium. Washington, DC: U.S. DoD, 11 June.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, R.M., 2015. Duty: memoirs of a secretary at war. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gauck, J., 2014. Deutschlands Rolle in der Welt: Anmerkungen zu Verantwortung, Normen und Bündnissen [Germany’s role in the world: reflections on responsibility, norms and alliances]. Speech by Federal President Joachim Gauck at the opening of the Munich Security Conference on 31 January 2014 in Munich. Berlin: Office of the Federal President.
   Google Scholar
• German and Swedish MoD, 2010. Pooling and sharing, German-Swedish initiative: food for thought. Berlin: German and Swedish MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD (Federal Ministry of Defence), 2011. Verteidigungspolitische Richtlinien: Nationale Interessen wahren – Internationale Verantwortung übernehmen – Sicherheit gemeinsam gestalten [Defence policy guidelines: safeguarding national interests – assuming international responsibility – shaping security together]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2013a. Food for thought. Framework Nations Concept. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2013b. Konzeption der Bundeswehr [Conception of the Bundeswehr]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2014a. Gemeinsame Erklärung der deutschen, dänischen und polnischen Verteidigungsminister zur Weiterentwicklung des Multinationalen Korps Nordost in Stettin [Joint statement by the German, Danish and Polish defense ministers on the further development of the Multinational Corps Northeast in Stettin]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2014b. Unterzeichnung eines 10-Nationen-Briefs an den NATO-Generalsekretär zur weiteren Umsetzung des Framework Nations Concept [Signing of a 10-nation letter to the NATO Secretary General to further implement the Framework Nations Concept]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2015. Ministerin von der Leyen: ‘Uns ist wichtig, ein starker Pfeiler der Allianz zu sein’ [Minister von der Leyen: For us it is important to be a strong pillar of the alliance]. 14 April [Online]. Available from: http://www.bmvg.de/portal/a/bmvg/!ut/p/c4/NYu7DsIwEAT_yGc3iNARRUhABwUJneNYzoFfulxCw8djF-xKU-xo4QmlUW_oNGOK2kMPg8HD-BFj2Jx4pZXKKhY0s6XZIi85eWR8w6NeJytMipYr2UbGQkeaE4mciH01K1ExAicYpOpaqeQ_6tv098vp2ux33bm9QQ7h-AOzMoh3/ [Accessed 13 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2016a. Deutschland und Niederlande verstärken militärische Kooperation ihrer Streitkräfte [Germany and the Netherlands strengthen military cooperation between their armed forces]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• German MoD, 2016b. Weißbuch 2016 zur Sicherheitspolitik und zur Zukunft der Bundeswehr [White paper 2016 on German security policy and the future of the Bundeswehr]. Berlin: German MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J., 2016. The Obama doctrine. The Atlantic Monthly, 317, 70–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, J. and Nygårds, O., 2015a. Försvaret informerat om nya elitstyrkan [The armed forces informed about new elite force]. Svenska Dagbladet, 19 Sep [online]. Available from: https://www.svd.se/forsvaret-informerat-om-nya-elitstyrkan [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, J. and Nygårds, O., 2015b. Hemlig process tar Sverige mot Natos elitstyrka [Secret process brings Sweden closer to NATO elite force]. Svenska Dagbladet, 18 Sep [online]. Available from: https://www.svd.se/sverige-kommer-annu-narmare-natos-skarpa-verksamhet [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, J. and Nygårds, O., 2015c. Hultqvist frågas ut om SvD:s Natoavslöjande [Hultqvist questioned on SvD’s NATO disclosure]. Svenska Dagbladet, 23 Sep [online]. Available from: https://www.svd.se/hultqvist-fragas-ut-om-svds-natoavslojande [Accessed 21 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Heisbourg, F., 2016. Brexit and European security. Survival, 58 (3), 13–22.10.1080/00396338.2016.1186973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilde, P. S., 2014. Nordic-Baltic security and defence cooperation: The Norwegian perspective. In: A.Dahl and P.Järvenpää, eds. Northern Security and Global Politics: Nordic-Baltic strategic influence in a post-unipolar world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2010a. Securing Britain in an age of uncertainty: the strategic defence and security review. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2010b. A strong Britain in an Age of uncertainty: the national security strategy. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2015a. National security strategy and strategic defence and security review 2015: a secure and prosperous United Kingdom. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2015b. SDSR 2015: defence fact sheets. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2016. National security strategy and strategic defence and security review 2015: first annual report 2016. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, M., 2017. Sverige kan gå med i brittisk militärstyrka [Sweden could join British military force]. Dagens Nyheter, 4 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Hultqvist, P., 2016. Samarbete med Nato ja, medlemskap nej [Cooperation with NATO yes, membership no]. Aftonbladet, 11 April.
   Google Scholar
• JFC (Joint Forces Command), 2016. JEF Newsletter. JFC HQ, March.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., 2014. NATO states create new multilateral force. Financial Times, 29 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Jungholt, T., 2016. Wie von der Leyen die europäische Armee vorantreibt [How von der Leyen pushes the European army forward]. Die Welt, 4 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Kaljurand, R., et al., 2016. Brexit and Baltic sea security. Tallinn: International Centre for Defence and Security.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., 2011. The transformation of Europe’s armed forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkup, J. and Bingham, J., 2010. Anglo-French military force makes ‘perfect sense’ – Liam Fox. The Telegraph, 2 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, F.D., 2014. NATO’s framework nations: capabilities for an unpredictable world. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kufčák, J., 2014. Czech Defence Policy in 2015: NATO’s framework nation concept and V4 defence cooperation. Prague: Association for International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Landler, M. and Lyman, R., 2016. Obama tells NATO that ‘Europe Can Count On’ the U.S. The New York Times, 9 July.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, F.S., et al., 2012. NATO and the challenges of austerity. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Löfvenberg, J., 2016. Löfven: ‘Inte vad jag hade hoppats på’ [Löfven: Not what I had hoped for]. Aftonbladet, 24 June.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, S. and Widen, J.J., 2016. Swedish-Finnish naval cooperation in the Baltic Sea: motives, prospects and challenges. Defence Studies, 16 (4), 346–373.10.1080/14702436.2016.1220805
   Google Scholar
• Major, C. and Mölling, C., 2014. The Framework Nations Concept. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Major, C. and Mölling, C., 2015. NATO’s strategic adaptation Germany is the backbone for the alliance’s military reorganisation. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, A. 2014. Framework nations: a German answer to a European problem? [online]. Available from: http://www.europeangeostrategy.org/2014/03/framework-nations-german-answer-european-problem/ [Accessed 29 Sep 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., 2017. Northern triangle: US, UK and Norway’s expanding alliance. Defence News, 8 Jan [online] Available from: http://www.defensenews.com/articles/northern-triangle-us-uk-norway-growing-alliance [ Accessed 20 Feb 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Mihalka, M., 2005. NATO response force: rapid? Responsive? A force? Connections: the quarterly journal, 4, 67–79.10.11610/Connections
   Google Scholar
• Mölling, C., 2011. Europe without defence. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Multinational Interoperability Council, 2011. Coalition building guide. London: UK MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, M., 2013. Der Anti-Interventionist [The anti-interventionist]. Die Zeit, 9 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• NATO, 2012. The secretary general’s annual report 2011. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
   Google Scholar
• NATO, 2013. The secretary general’s annual report 2012. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
   Google Scholar
• NATO, 2016. The secretary general’s annual report 2015. Brussels: NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Heads of State and Government, 2014. Wales summit declaration. Brussels: NATO.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Heads of State and Government, 2016. Warsaw summit Communiqué. Brussels: NATO.
   Google Scholar
• NATO International Staff: Private Office of the Secretary General, 2014. Framework Nations Concept. Brussels: NATO, 21 May.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian MoD (Ministry of Defence), 2016. Kampkraft og bærekraft. Langtidsplan for forsvarssektoren [Capable and sustainable. long term defence plan]. Proposition to the Storting, No. 151 S (2015–2016).
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, G., 2015. Sweden considers joining UK-led force. Defense News, 5 Oct.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. C., 2015. The U.S. experience: national strategy and campaign support. In: Mueller, Karl P., ed. Precision and purpose: airpower in the libyan civil war. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 69–105.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D.A.R., 2016. The framework nations’ concept and NATO: game-changer for a new strategic era or missed opportunity?. Rome: NATO Defense College.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J.E., et al., 2001. European contributions to operation allied force: implications for transatlantic cooperation. Santa Monika, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D., 2012. Annual Chief of the Defence Staff Lecture – Speech delivered by General Sir David Richards, Chief of the Defence Staff, at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), on 17 December 2012. London: UK MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J., 2009. NATO’s response force: finally getting it right? European Security, 18 (3), 287–304.10.1080/09662831003694674
   Google Scholar
• Schlie, U., 2014. Das Rahmennationen-Konzept [The Framework Nations Concept]. Allgemeine Schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, 180 (7), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, B., 2004. European capabilities: how many divisions? In: N. Gnesotto, ed. EU security and defence policy: the first five years. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 1999–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schreer, B., 2013. The reluctant ally? Germany, NATO and the use of force. In: J.H. Matlarty and M. Petersson, eds. NATO’s European Allies: military capability and political will. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Defence, 1995. Cm. 2800. Statement on the defence estimates 1995. Stable forces in a strong Britain. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Defence, 1998. Cm. 3999. Strategic defence review: modern forces for the modern world. London: UK MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Defence, 2015. HC 32. Annual report and accounts 2014–2015. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, K., Stokes, B., and Poushter, J., 2015. NATO publics blame Russia for Ukrainian crisis, but reluctant to provide military aid. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• SIPRI, 2016. SIPRI military expenditure database: data for NATO members from 1949–2015. Stockholm: SIPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Søreide, I. E., 2014. Norway, NATO and the crisis in Ukraine. Speech by Minister of Defense, Ine Eriksen Søreide, at Chatham House, London, 29 April 2014. Oslo: Norwegian MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Stansfield, G. and Kelly, S., 2013. A return to east of suez? UK military deployment to the gulf. London: RUSI.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish MoD (Ministry of Defence), 2015. Försvarspolitisk inriktning – Sveriges försvar 2016–2020 [Sweden’s defence policy 2016–2020]. Stockholm: Swedish MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., 1995. The downing street years. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• The IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies), 1985. Militærbalansen 1985–1986 [The military balance 1985–1986]. Oslo: The Norwegian Atlantic Committee.
   Google Scholar
• The IISS, 1990. Militærbalansen 1990–1991 [The military balance 1990–1991]. Oslo: The Norwegian Atlantic Committee.
   Google Scholar
• The IISS, 2015. The military balance 2015. London: Routledge for The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• The IISS, 2016. The military balance 2016. London: Routledge for The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• The IISS, 2017. The military balance 2017. London: Routledge for The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• UK MoD (Ministry of Defence), 2010a. UK-France defence co-operation treaty announced [Online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-france-defence-co-operation-treaty-announced–2 [Accessed 2 Apr 2014].
   Google Scholar
• UK MoD, 2010b. UK–France summit 2010 declaration on defence and security co-operation [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-france-summit-2010-declaration-on-defence-and-security-co-operation [Accessed 27 Sep 2016].
   Google Scholar
• UK MoD, 2013. The United Kingdom Joint Expeditionary Force (UK JEF). London: UK MoD.
   Google Scholar
• UK MoD, 2014. International partners sign Joint Expeditionary Force agreement [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/international-partners-sign-joint-expeditionary-force-agreement [Accessed 15 Sep 2014].
   Google Scholar
• UK MoD, 2015. UK-led joint force launched to tackle common threats [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-led-joint-force-launched-to-tackle-common-threats [ Accessed 24 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Valasek, T., 2011. Surviving austerity: the case for a new approach to EU military collaboration. London: The Centre for European Reform.
   Google Scholar
• von der Leyen, U., 2014. Speech by the Federal Minister of Defense, Dr. Ursula von der Leyen, on the Occasion of the 50th Munich Security Conference. Berlin: German MoD, 31 January.
   Google Scholar
• Zandee, D., Drent, M., and Hendriks, R., 2013. Bold steps in multinational cooperation: taking European defence forward. The Hague: Clingendael.
   Google Scholar
• Zandee, D., Drent, M., and Hendriks, R., 2016. Defence cooperation models: lessons learned and usability. The Hague: Clingendael.
   Google Scholar