Striking a deal on the F-35: multinational politics and US defence acquisition

References

• Allison, G., 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the cuban missile crisis. Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P.A., 2003. Globalization, US export control and implications for US military dominance. USAWC Strategy Research Project. April 2003.10.21236/ADA415479
   Google Scholar
• Bolkcom, C., 2005. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program: background, status, and issues. CRS Report to Congress, 29 August.
   Google Scholar
• Castellacci, Fluvio, Arne Martin Fevolden, and Martin Lundmark. 2014. How are defence companies responding to EU defence and security market liberalization? A comparison of Norway and Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (8), 1218–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettinger, A. and Rice, J., 2016. Hell is other people’s schedule: Canada’s limited-term military commitments, 2001–2015. International Journal, 71 (3). 371–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, J., 2012. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program. CRS Report to Congress, 16 February.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Ernst B., 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., 2011. US Puts F-35 STOVL variant on two-year probation. Jane’s Defence Weekly, January 7.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T., 2015. Analysis of the FY2015 budget. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K., 2006. Defence industrial policy in a military alliance. Journal of Peace Research, 43 (4), 473–489.10.1177/0022343306064976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrotin, J., 2011. Aviation de combat: La 5e generation cherche sa voie. [Combat Aviation: The 5th Generation Aircraft Tries to Find its Way]. Défense et sécurité international, ( 18).
   Google Scholar
• von Hlatky, S., 2014. Burden sharing and collective penny pinching within NATO: the implementation of smart defence. Studia Diplomatica, 67 (3), 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.L. 1992. Partnership with Europe. In E.B. Kapstein, ed. Global arms production: policy dilemmas for the 1990s. Lanham, MD: University Press of American, 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Strike Fighter Program, 2010. JSF Production, Sustainment and Follow-on Development (PSFD) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Available from: http://www.jsf.mil/downloads/documents/JSF_PSFD_MOU_-_Update_4_2010.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Kapstein, E.B., 1991. International collaboration in armaments production: a second best solution. Political Science Quarterly, 106 (4), 657–675.10.2307/2151798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapstein, E.B., 2004. Capturing fortress Europe: international collaboration and the Joint Strike Fighter. Survival, 46 (3), 137–159.10.1080/00396330412331343773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapstein, E.B., 2010. Arsenal’s end? American power and the global defense industry. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lockheed Martin, 2016. Temporary suspension of flight operations announced for a limited number of F-35A aircraft. F35.com. Available from: https://www.f35.com/news/detail/temporary-suspension-of-flight-operations-announced-for-a-limited-number-of.
   Google Scholar
• Lockheed Martin, 2017. Future air power – Denmark. F35.com. Available from: https://www.f35.com/global/participation/denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer, A., 2013. The Logic of Interoperability. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis., 68 (1), 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Massie, J., 2011. Bandwagoning for status: Canada’s need for the F-35. Canadian Foregin Policy Jouranl, 17 (3), 251–264.10.1080/11926422.2011.638197
   Google Scholar
• Masson, H., 2004. Participation de pays européens au projet d’avion de combat JSF et conséquences pour l’Europe de l’armement [Participation of European countries in the JSF program and the consequences for European defence]. Paris: Fondation por la Recherche Strategique.
   Google Scholar
• Matlary, J., 2009. European Union security dynamics: in the new national Interests. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230594302
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H., 1998. Industrial political economy: beyond hegemonic stability. Foreign Policy, 110, 112–123.10.2307/1149280
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A., 1990. The European armaments industry at the crossroads. Survival, 32 (1), 65–85.10.1080/00396339008442508
   Google Scholar
• Murch, A. and Bolkcom, C., 2008. Proposed termination of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) JSF F136 alternate engine. CRS Report to Congress, 2 June.
   Google Scholar
• Nossal, K.R., 2009. No exit: Canada and the ‘war without end’ in Afghanistan’. In: H. Erhart and C.C. Pentland, eds. The Afghanistan challenge: hard realities and strategic choices. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nossal, K.R., 2016. Charlie foxtrot: fixing defence procurement in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halon, M.E., 2000. Technological change and the future of warfare. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D., 2011. Leading from behind is still leading: Canada and the international intervention in Libya. Ottawa: Conference of Defence Associations Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pugliese, D., 2017. Lockheed Martin offers F-35 to Canada as ‘interim’ fighter jet. National Post, 7 August.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization, 42 (3), (Summer): 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A., 2016. Sharing the burden? U.S Allies, defence spending, and the future of NATO. Comparative Strategy, 35 (4), 298–314.10.1080/01495933.2016.1222843
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, E., 2011. Dod Dubs F-35 2nd engine self-funding unrealistic. Defense Daily, 27 June.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B., 2000. International law and state behavior: commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94 (4), 819–835.10.2307/2586210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, S.P. and Stropki, M.A., 2005. Effects of defense globalization: an examination of current and future command and control collaborations. Defense Acquisition Review Journal, 12 (3), 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist, 2011. The future of the Joint Strike Fighter: coming up short. The Economist, 14 July.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, 2010. Quadrennial defense review. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/qdr.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, 2014. Quadrennial defense review. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/qdr.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, 2016a. Department of defense selected acquisition reports. Release No: NR-106-16. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/703529/department-of-defense-selected-acquisition-reports-sars.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, 2016b. Department of Defense (DOD) releases fiscal year 2017 President’s budget proposal. Release no. NR-046-016. Available from: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/652687/department-of-defense-dod-releases-fiscal-year-2017-presidents-budget-proposal/.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, G.V. and Martinage, R., 2004. The revolution of war. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, 7–68.
   Google Scholar
• Vucetic, S., 2016. Who framed the F-35? Government media-relations in Canadian defence procurement. International Journal, 71 (2), 231–248.10.1177/0020702015609360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetic, S. and Nossal, K.R., 2013. The international politics of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. International Journal, 68 (1), 3–12.10.1177/002070201306800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vucetic, S. and Tago, A., 2015. Why buy American? The international politics of Flight Jet Transfers. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48 (1), 101–124.10.1017/S0008423914001103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, C.A., 2000. Institutional assets and adaptability: NATO after the cold war. International Organization, 54 (4), 705–735.10.1162/002081800551343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, W., 2011. Better late than never. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 173 (17).
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, W., 2012. The jet that ate the Pentagon. Foreign Affairs, 26 April. Available online at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/26/the-jet-that-ate-the-pentagon/
   Google Scholar