The role of ideas in defense planning: revisiting the revolution in military affairs

References

• Adamsky, D. and Bjerga, K.I., 2010. Introduction to the information-technology revolution in military affairs. Journal of strategic studies, 33 (4), 463–468. doi:10.1080/01402390.2010.489700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R., et al., 1998. Analytical narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaker, J.R. and Manning, R.A., 1997. Understanding the revolution in military affairs: A guide to America’s 21st century defense. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, defense working paper no. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Breitenbauch, H., and Jakobsson, A. K., 2018. Defence planning as strategic fact: introduction. Defence studies, 18 (3), 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F., 2014. International practice theory: new perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eggertsson, T., 1990. Economic behavior and institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1989. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., 1997. Manifesto of relational sociology. American journal of sociology, 103, 281–317. doi:10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D., 1991. Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World politics, 43, 169–196. doi:10.2307/2010470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genieys, W., 2010. The new custodians of the state: programmatic elite in French society. New York, New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Genieys, W. and Smyrl, M., 2008a. Inside the autonomous state: programmatic elites in the reform of french health policy. Governance, 21 (1), 75–93. doi:10.1111/gove.2008.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genieys, W. and Smyrl, M., 2008b. Elites, ideas, and the evolution of public policy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L. and Bennett, A., 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenteufel, P., et al., 1999. L’emergence d’une “elite du Welfare”? Sociologie des sommets de l’Etat en interaction. Le cas des politiques de protection maladie et en matiere de prestations familias. Paris: M.I.R.E.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenteufel, P., et al., 2010. Programmatic actors and the transformation of European health care states. Journal of health politics, policy, and law, 35 (4), 1–19. doi:10.1215/03616878-2010-015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R., eds., 1998. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikle, F. and Wohlstetter, A., 1988. Discriminate deterrence. Washington, DC: Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Interview a. 2010. Appointed OSD Official, 5 May.
   Google Scholar
• Interview a. 2011. Appointed OSD Official, 17 January.
   Google Scholar
• Interview b. 2010. OSD Official, 5 May.
   Google Scholar
• Interview b. 2010. Former General Officer, 18 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview c. 2010. Appointed OSD Official, 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• Interview c. 2010. Former Appointed Department of the Air Force, 24 February.
   Google Scholar
• Interview d. 2010. Appoint OSD Official, 15 May.
   Google Scholar
• Interview f. 2010. Former Senior Officer Serving in OSD, 29 May.
   Google Scholar
• Interview g. 2010. Former General Officer, 22 June.
   Google Scholar
• Interview h. 2010. Former OSD Official, 7 October.
   Google Scholar
• Interview i. 2010. Appointed OSD Official, 2 December.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P.T. and Nexon, D.H., 1999. Relations before states: substance, process and the study of world politics. European journal of international relations, 5 (3), 291–332. doi:10.1177/1354066199005003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., 2016a. Escaping the iron cage: the institutional foundations of FM 3–24, counterinsurgency doctrine. Journal of strategic studies, 39 (2), 213–230. doi:10.1080/01402390.2015.1115038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., 2016b. Forging the sword: doctrinal change in the U.S. army. Pal Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joana, J. and Smith, A., 2006. Changing French military procurement policy: the State, industry, and ‘Europe’ in the Case of the A400M. West European politics, 29 (1), 70–89. doi:10.1080/01402380500389257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilzad, Z., ed., 1996. Strategic Appraisal 1996. Washington, DC: RAND Corporation, Project Air Force.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policy. New York: Harper Collins Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Krepenvich, A. and Watts, B., 2015. The last warrior: Andrew Marshall and the shaping of modern American defense strategy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lomov, C. and Gen, N.A., ed., 1973. Scientific-technical progress and the revolution in military affairs. Moscow: Translated by the USAF.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C., 2001. Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T., 1984. The new economics of organization. American journal of political science, 28, 4. doi:10.2307/2110997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T., 1990. Political institutions: the neglected side of the story. Journal of law, economics, and organization, 6, 213–253. doi:10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W., 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R., 1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, W.A., 2001. Lifting the fog of war. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci, P.A. 1975. Summary report of the Long Range Research and Development Planning Program (LRRDP). Falls Church: Lulejian & Associates, Declassified 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., 2008. The logic of practicality: a theory of practice of security communities. International organization, 62 (2), 257–288. doi:10.1017/S0020818308080090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S.P., 1988. New ways of war. International security, 13 (1), 134–168. doi:10.2307/2538898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S.P., 1991. Winning the next war: innovation and the modern military. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 2007. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: P. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T.C., 1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A.L., 1991. The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in the social sciences. The philosophy and social science, 21 (36), 367–388. doi:10.1177/004839319102100305
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., 2003. How institutions evolve. In: J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, eds. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–240.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., 2004. How institutions evolve: the political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S., 1992. Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2001. Mechanisms in political processes. Annual review of political science, 4, 21–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2002. Stories identities, and political change. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2003. Politics of collective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2005. Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder: Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A., 1984a. Future shock. New York: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A., 1984b. The third wave. New York: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A., 1991. Powershift: knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century. New York: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• True, J., Jones, B., and Baumgartner, F., 1999. Punctuated equilibrium theory. Explaining stability and change in American policy making. In: P. Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Tsbelis, G., 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, G., 1965. The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, M., 1989. Technology and war: from 2000 B.C. to the present. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, M., 1991. The transformation of war. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, B.D., 2007. Six decades of guided munitions and battle networks: progress and prospects. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.Q., 1966. Innovation in organizations: notes toward a theory. In: J.D. Thompson, ed. Approaches to organizational design pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar