Future Reserves 2020: perceptions of cohesion, readiness and transformation in the British Army Reserve

References

• Bury, P. 2016. Recruitment and retention in British Army Reserve logistics units. Armed forces and society,  43 (4), 608-631.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, P. 2017. The changing nature of reserve cohesion. Armed forces and society, online.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, P. 2019. Mission improbable: the transformation of the British Army Reserve. Hampshire: Howgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bartone, P. and Kirkland, F., 1991. Optimal leadership in small army units. In: R. Gal and A. Mangelsdorff, eds. Handbook of military psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D., et al., 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of applied psychology, 88 (6), 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, I., 1982. Riflemen form: a study of the rifleman volunteer movement, 1859–1908. Aldershot: The Ogilby Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, I., 2008. Territorials: a century of service. Plymouth: DRA.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Ari, E. and Lomsky-Feder, 2011. Epilogue: theoretical and comparative notes on reserve forces. Armed forces and society, 37 (2), 361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkshire Consultancy, 2010. Study of women in combat – investigation of quantitative data. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27404/study_woman_combat_quant_data.pdf [Accessed 7 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, V., 2013. Cultural differences between the regular army and AR as barriers to integration. Unpublished paper prepared for Director. Personnel, Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, H., 1975. The volunteer force: a social and political history, 1859–1908. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Dandeker, C., Greenberg, N., and Orme, G., 2011. The UK’s reserve forces: retrospect and prospect. Armed forces & society, 37 (2), 341–360. doi:10.1177/0095327X11398332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T., et al., 2016. Reserve forces and the transformation of British military organisation: soldiers, citizens and society. Defence studies, 16 (2), 118–136. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1163225
   Google Scholar
• Gal, R., 1986. Unit morale: from a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration–an Israeli example. Journal of applied social psychology, 16(6), 549-564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 1988. Measurement of group cohesion in U. S. Army units. Basic and applied social psychology, 9, 149–171. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0902_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2002. Multilevel analysis of cohesion’s relation to stress, well-being, identification, disintegration and perceived combat readiness. Military psychology, 14 (3), 217–239. doi:10.1207/S15327876MP1403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2007. Further considerations concerning the cohesion-performance relation in military settings. Armed forces & society, 34 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2009a. After 9/11 what kind of reserve soldier. Armed forces and society, 35 (2), 214-240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2009b. Being a reserve soldier: a matter of social identity. Armed forces & society, 36 (1), 38–64. doi:10.1177/0095327X08327819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2011. Contradictory and complementary identities of US Army reservists: a historical perspective. Armed forces & society, 37 (2), 261–283. doi:10.1177/0095327X09354167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M., 1992. The social psychology of group cohesiveness: from attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, L. and Manning, F., 1981. Cohesion: who needs it, what is it, and how do we get it to them? Military review, 61 (6), 2-12.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., 2006. The word of command: communication and cohesion in the military. Armed forces & society, 32 (4), 493–512. doi:10.1177/0095327X05283041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., 2007. The existence of group cohesion in the armed forces. Armed forces & society, 33 (4), 638–645. doi:10.1177/0095327X07301445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., 2013. The combat soldier. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirke, C., 2008. Issues in integrating territorial army soldiers into regular British Units for operations: a regular view. Defense & security analysis, 24 (2), 181–195. doi:10.1080/14751790802124980
   Google Scholar
• Lomsky-Feder, E., Gazit, N., and Ben Ari, E., 2008. Reserve soldiers as transmigrants: moving between the civilian and military worlds. Armed forces & society, 34 (4), 593–614. doi:10.1177/0095327X07312090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. and Hix, W., 2010. Cohesion and performance’, in national defense institute, sexual orientation and U.S. military policy: an update of RAND’s 1993 study. Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R., Kier, E., and Belkin, A., 2006. Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? Armed forces & society, 32 (4), 646–654. doi:10.1177/0095327X05279181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2013a. Future Reserves 2020: valuable and valued, (white paper). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2013b. Transforming the British Army, an update – July 2013. London: MoD.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2016. Armed forces continuous attitudes survey 2016. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523875/AFCAS_2016_Main_Report.pdf [Accessed 21 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2017. UK armed forces biannual diversity statistics. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-armed-forces-biannual-diversity-statistics-2017 [Accessed 9 July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence, 2018. Reserve forces continuous attitudes survey 2018. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/armed-forces-continuous-attitude-survey-2018 [Accessed 9 July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Mitchinson, K., 2005. Defending Albion: Britain’s Home Army 1908–1919. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchinson, K., 2008. England’s last hope: the territorial force 1908–14. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchinson, K., 2014. The territorial force at war 1914–16. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B. and Copper, C., 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychological bulletin, 115 (2), 210-227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoD, 2015. Vision for an inclusive army. Available from https://modmedia.blog.gov.uk [Accessed 15 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, L., et al., 1999. A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. Military psychology, 11 (1), 57–83. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, M., 2011. United we stand – divided we fall: a standard model of unit cohesion. Helsinki: Department of Social Research, Helsinki University.
   Google Scholar
• Salo, M. and Siebold, G., 2005. Cohesion component as predictors of performance and attitudinal criteria. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Military Testing Association, 7–10 November, Singapore. Unpublished conference paper.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. and Janowitz, M. 1948. Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht. Public opinion quarterly, Summer.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, G., 1996. Small unit dynamics: leadership, cohesion, motivation, and morale. In: R. Phelps and B. Farr, eds. Reserve component soldiers as peacekeepers. Virginia: US Army Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, G., 1999. The evolution of the measurement of cohesion. Military psychology, 11 (1), 5–26. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G., 2007. The essence of military group cohesion. Armed forces & society, 33 (2), 286–295. doi:10.1177/0095327X06294173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G., 2012. The science of military cohesion. In: M. Salo and R. Sinkko, eds. The science of unit cohesion – its characteristics and impacts. Tampere: Finnish National Defence University.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, G., et al., 2016. Combat, cohesion, and controversy - disputatio sine fine. Armed forces & society, 42 (2), 449–462. doi:10.1177/0095327X15573213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G. and Kelly, D., 1988a. The development of the platoon cohesion index. Washington: Army Research Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, G. and Kelly, D., 1988b. The development of the combat platoon cohesion questionnaire. Washington: Army Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sion, L. and Ben-Ari, E., 2005. Hungry, weary and horny: joking and jesting among Israel’s combat reserves. Israel affairs, 11 (4), 655-671.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, M. and Griffith, J., 1990. An evaluation of unit replacement on unit cohesion and individual morale in the U. S. Army all-volunteer force. Military psychology, 2 (4), 221–239. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0204_3
   Google Scholar
• Vest, B., 2013. Citizen, soldier, or citizen-soldier? negotiating identity in the US National Guard. Armed forces & society, 39 (4), 602–627. doi:10.1177/0095327X12457725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, W., 1990. Reserve forces and the British Territorial Army. London: Tri-Services.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., 2011. The French Military Reserve: real or abstract force?Armed forces & society, 37 (2), 321–340. doi:10.1177/0095327X10390457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L., et al., 2003. Why they fight: combat motivation in the Iraq war. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
   Google Scholar