http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-6095
References
- Aaronson, M., et al., eds. 2015. Precision strike warfare and international intervention: strategic, ethico-legal, and decisional implications. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Abrahamsson, B., 1972. Militärer, makt och politik [Military, power and politics]. Stockholm: Prisma.
- Alvinius, A., 2012. The inadequacy of bureaucratic organizations: organizational adaptation through boundary spanning in a civil-military context. Res militaris, 3 (1), 1–23.
- Alvinius, A., 2013. Bridging boundaries in the borderland of bureaucracies – individual impact on organisational adaption to demanding situations in civil and military contexts. (Dissertation No. 2013:12), Faculty of Arts and Education, Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies.
- Alvinius, A., Johansson, E., and Larsson, G., 2016. Negative organizations: antecedent of negative leadership? In: D. Wojcheshin and D. Watola, eds. Negative Leadership. Canadian Armed Forces. IMLAW. Kingston, Canada: Canadian Defence Academy Press, 57-74.
- Alvinius, A., Ohlsson, A., and Larsson, G., 2018. Organizational challenges and leaders’ coping strategies – a qualitative study of Swedish military staff-organization. Journal of military studies. Published ahead of print. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jms-2017-0002
- Alvinius, A., Holmberg, A., and Johansson, E., 2019. Do military leaders resist organizational challenges? Forthcoming in. Journal of Resistance Studies.
- Anderson, W.A., 1970. Military organizations in natural disaster: established and emergent norms. American behavioral scientist, 13 (3), 415–422. doi:10.1177/000276427001300311
- Angstrom, J., 2010. Försvarsmaktens internationella insatser: I den svenska säkerheten eller identitetens tjänst? In: K. Engelbrekt and J. Angström, eds. Svensk säkerhetspolitik i Europa och världen [Swedish security policy in Europe and the world]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 169–202.
- Bergström, O., Styhre, A., and Thilander, P., 2014. Paradoxifying organizational change: cynicism and resistance in the Swedish Armed Forces. Journal of change management, 14 (3), 384–404. doi:10.1080/14697017.2014.938096
- Brante, T., et al., 2015. Professionerna i kunskapssamhället: en jämförande studie av svenska professioner[The professions in the knowledge society: A comparative study]. Stockholm: Liber.
- Buzan, B. and Hansen, L., 2009. The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Carvin, S. and Williams, M.J., 2015. Law, science, liberalism and the American way of warfare: the quest for humanity in conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Castilla, E.J. and Benard, S., 2010. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 55, 543–576. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
- Coleman, K.P., 2007. International organizations and peace enforcement: the politics of international legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Coser, L.A., 1974. Greedy institutions; patterns of undivided commitment. New York: Free Press.
- Dessler, G., 1976. Organization and management: A contingency approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
- Deverell, E., et al., 2015. Understanding public agency communication: the case of the Swedish armed forces. Journal of public affairs, 15 (4), 387–396. doi:10.1002/pa.1552
- Donaldson, L., 2001. The contingency theory of organizations. London: Sage Publication.
- Du Gay, P. and Vikkelso, S., 2012. Reflections: on the lost specification of ’Change’. Journal of change management, 12 (2), 121–143. doi:10.1080/14697017.2011.606609
- Eriksson, A. 2006. Europeanization and governance in defence policy: The example of Sweden. Stockholm Studies in Politics 117. Stockholm: Department of Political Science, Stockholm University
- Evangelista, M. and Shue, H., eds., 2014. The American way of bombing: changing ethical and legal norms, from flying fortresses to drones. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Farrell, T., Osinga, F., and Russell, J.A., Eds, 2014. Military adaptation in Afghanistan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Finnemore, M., 2003. The purpose of intervention: changing beliefs about the use of force. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
- Forster, A., 2006. Armed forces and society in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Goffman, E., 1961. Asylums. New York: Anchor.
- Haaland Matláry, J., 2009. European union security dynamics: in the new national interest. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Holmberg, A., 2015. A demilitarization process under challenge? The example of Sweden. Defence studies, 15 (3), 235–253. doi:10.1080/14702436.2015.1084174
- Holmberg, A. and Hallenberg, J., Eds, 2017. The Swedish presence in Afghanistan: security and defence transformation. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Inglehart, R., 2008. Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European politics, 31 (1–2), 130–146. doi:10.1080/01402380701834747
- Johansson, E., 1997. The role of peacekeepers in the 1990s: swedish experience in UNPROFOR. Armed forces & society, 23 (3), 451–465. doi:10.1177/0095327X9702300307
- Kaarbo, J. and Beasley, R.K., 1999. A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political psychology, 20 (2), 369–391. doi:10.1111/pops.1999.20.issue-2
- Katzenstein, P., ed, 1996. The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
- King, A., 2011. The transformation of Europe’s armed forces: from the Rhine to Afghanistan. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kirschenbaum, A., 2004. Chaos organization and disaster management. New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Levy, Y., 2013. Convertible sacrifice – a conceptual proposition. Sociological perspectives, 56 (3), 439–463. doi:10.1525/sop.2013.56.3.439
- Mérand, F. 2008. European defence policy: beyond the nation-state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Moskos, C.C., Williams, J.A., and Segal, D.R., Eds, 2000. The postmodern military: armed forces after the cold war. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2016. New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations. Defence studies, 16 (3), 312–326. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1195234
- Olsson, E.-K., et al., 2016. EU armed forces and social media: convergence or divergence? Defence studies, 16 (2), 97–117. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1155412
- Petersson, M., 2011. defence transformation and legitimacy in scandinavia after the cold war: theoretical and practical implications. Armed forces & society, 37 (4), 701–724. doi:10.1177/0095327X10382216
- Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R., 2003. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: California: Stanford Business Books.
- Pretorius, J., 2008. The security imaginary: explaining military isomorphism. Security dialogue, 39 (1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/0967010607086825
- Rieker, P., 2006. Europeanization of national security identity: the EU and the changing security identities of the Nordic states. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Rosa, H., 2013. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Chicago: Columbia University Press.
- Soeters, J.L., Winslow, D.J., and Weibull, A., 2006. Military culture. In: G. Caforio, ed. Handbook of the sociology of the military. New York: Springer US, 237–254.
- Szvircsev, T. and Leuprecht, C., Eds, 2010. Europe without soldiers? Recruitment and retention across the armed forces of Europe. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Weibull, L., 2012. Emotion matters. Emotion management in Swedish peace support operations. (Doctoral Dissertation 2012:47). Karlstad: Faculty of Economic Science, Communication and IT, Working Life Science, Karlstad University Studies.
- Ydén, K., 2008. ”Kriget” och karriärsystemet. Försvarsmaktens organiserande i fred. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law.