Spaghetti: systems thinking and the US Army

References

• Abarbanel, H.D.I., Brown, R., and Kadtke, J.B., 1990. Prediction in chaotic nonlinear systems: methods for time series with broadband fourier spectra. Physical Review A, 41 (4), 1782–1807. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.41.1782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abella, A., 2009. Soldiers of reason: the Rand corporation and the rise of the American empire. Boston, New York: Mariner Books/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock, R., 2001. Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95 (3), 529–546. doi:10.1017/S0003055401003100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle, 1991. The metaphysics. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, F., 1963. Naval weapons of the seventies. Naval Aviation News, January.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, L.M., 1991. Likelihood and Bayesian prediction of chaotic systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86 (416), 938–952. doi:10.1080/01621459.1991.10475137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W., 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56 (2), 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrowski, A.K. and Garstka, J.J., 1998. Network-centric warfare - its origin and future. Proceedings Magazine, January.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. and Chen, G., 2000. Fuzzy modeling, prediction, and control of uncertain chaotic systems based on time series. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 47 (10), 1527–1531. doi:10.1109/81.886983.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P.P., 1994. Fire, motion, and productivity: the proto-energetics of nature and economy in François quesnay. In: P. Mirowski, ed. Natural images in economic thought: markets read in tooth and claw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–288.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C.W., 1979. The systems approach. Rev. and updated ed. New York: Dell Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W.P., Freeman, D., and McCloskey, J.F., 1984. OR forum—of radar and operations research: an appreciation of A. P. Rowe (1898–1976). Operations Research, 32 (4), 958–967. doi:10.1287/opre.32.4.958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, R. and Siang, T. n.d. 5 stages in the design thinking process. The Interaction Design Foundation. Available from: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process Accessed 19 Dec 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Deptula, D.A., 2001. Effects-based operations: change in the nature of warfare. Defense and airpower series. Arlington, VA: Aerospace Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Digby, J., 1989. Operations research and systems analysis at RAND, 1948–1967. A RAND Note N-2936-RC. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation. Available from: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2007/N2936.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dörner, D., 2010. The logic of failure: strategic thinking for complex situations. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W., 1973. World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W., 1993. System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years. In: K.B. De Greene, ed. A systems-based approach to policymaking. Boston, MA: Springer, 199–240.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W., 1997. Industrial dynamics. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48 (10), 1037–1041. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J.W., 1999. Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J., 2008. Chaos: making a new science. Anniversary. Reprint ed. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gracier, O., 2017. Self-disruption: seizing the high ground of systemic operational design. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 17 (4), 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R.C., 2004. Sea gulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: a brief history of the butterfly effect in nonlinear dynamics. American journal of physics, 72 (4), 425–427. doi:10.1119/1.1636492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, M.W., 1956. An introduction to systems analysis. RM-1678. US Air Force Project RAND Research Memorandum. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H., 1992. Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus, 121 (1), 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H., 2014. Complexity: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoos, I., 1972. Systems analysis in public policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• IBM, n.d. IBM design thinking field guide. Available from: https://www-356.ibm.com/partnerworld/wps/static/watsonbuild/media/IBM%20Design%20Thinking%20Field%20Guide%20Watson%20Build%20v3.5_ac.pdf [Accessed 23 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• IDEO U, Design thinking. IDEO U. Available from: https://www.ideou.com/pages/design-thinking [Accessed 19 Dec 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Jen, N. 2017, Natasha Jen: design thinking is Bullsh*t. Presented at the 99U Conference, New York City, 7 June. Available from: https://vimeo.com/228126880 [Accessed 25 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., and Çetinkaya, M., 2013. Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22 (2), 121–146. doi:10.1111/caim.2013.22.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, F., 2013. The end of the age of petreus: the rise and fall of counterinsurgency. Foreign Affairs, 92 (1), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, F. and Sherwin, M.J., 1991. The wizards of armageddon. 1st ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kappel, F.R., 1963. Business and science. In: Proceedings: CIOS XIII international management congress. New York: Council for International Progress in Management (USA), Vol. XIII, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. and Kilcullen, D., 2004. Chaos versus predictability: a critique of effects-based operations. Australian Army Journal, 2 (1), 97–98.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, W., 1959. Gestalt psychology today. American Psychologist, 14 (12), 727. doi:10.1037/h0042492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, R., 1975. Systems theory as an ideology. Social research, 42 (4), 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E.N., 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20 (2), 130–141. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, D.A. and Stamatakis, K.A., 2012. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annual review of public health, 33, 357–376. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclay, K., n.d. 03.31.2004 - C. West Churchman Dies. UCBerkeleyNews. Available from: https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/03/31_chrch.shtml [Accessed 6 Mar 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Mattis, J.N., 2008. USJFCOM commander’s guidance for effects-based operations. Parameters, Autumn, p. 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, J.F., 1987. OR Forum—the beginnings of operations research: 1934–1941. Operations Research, 35 (1), 143–152. doi:10.1287/opre.35.1.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H., 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer. Edited by Diana Wright. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J., 2011. Complex systems: a survey. American journal of physics, 79, 800–810. doi:10.1119/1.3590372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quade, E.S., 1963. Military systems analysis. Memorandum RM-3452-PR. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Quesnay, F., 1894. Tableau Oeconomique. London: British Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• RAND Corporation, n.d. A brief history of the RAND Corporation. Available from: https://www.rand.org/about/history/a-brief-history-of-rand.html [Accessed 6 Mar 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Schön, D., 1993. Reframing policy discourse. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 145–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Schön, D., 1996. Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy, 9 (1), 85–104. doi:10.1007/BF02832235.
   Google Scholar
• Research | Santa Fe Institute, n.d. Available from: https://www.santafe.edu/research [Accessed 11 Mar 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, P., 2010. Robert S. McNamara and the evolution of modern management. Harvard Business Review, 1 Dec. Available from: https://hbr.org/2010/12/robert-s-mcnamara-and-the-evolution-of-modern-management
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A., 2001. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smuts, J.C., 1986. Holism and evolution. Gouldsboro, ME: The Gestalt Journal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, David., and Mary E. Boone. 2007. A Leader's Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review [online], November 2007. Available from: https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making [Accessed March 21, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A.D., 1998. What the social text affair does and does not prove. In: N. Koertge, ed. A house built on sand: exposing postmodern myths about science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A.D. and Bricmont, J., 1998. Fashionable nonsense: postmodern intellectuals‘ abuse of science. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrells, W.T., et al., 2005. Systemic operational design: an introduction. Monograph. US Army School of Advanced Military Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, H., 1860. The social organism. Westminster Review, 73 (143), 90–121.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M.A., 2010. What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? European Journal of Development Research, 22 (1), 31–54. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Congress, 1962. House of representatives. Subcommittee on department of defense appropriations. Department of defense appropriations for 1963: hearings before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations, house of representatives. 87th Congress, Second Session. Part 3: Operation and Maintenance, 259. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.aa0014408017?urlappend=%3Bseq=1201 [Accessed 26 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Defense, Joint Staff, 2006. Joint Publication (JP) 3-0, joint operations. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Air Force, 2016. Annex 3-0 operations and planning. Curtis E. Lemay Center for Doctrine Development and Education. Available from: http://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/Annex_3-0/3-0-Annex-OPERATIONS-PLANNING.pdf?ver=2017-09-17-103446-507 [Accessed 23 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 1972. The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15 (4), 407–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2006. Field Manual-Interim (FMI) 5-01, the operations process. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2007. Army Doctrine Update. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army. Available from: February 24, 2007. smallwarsjournal.com/documents/armydoctrineupdate.pdf [Accessed 25 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2008. Commander’s appreciation and campaign design. TRADOC Pamphlet 525-5–500. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2012a. Army Doctrine Reference Publications (ADRP) 5-0, the operations process. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2012b. Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 1, the army. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2014a. Field Manual (FM) 3-24/Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-33.5, insurgencies and countering insurgencies. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2014b. The Army Operating Concept (AOC): win in a complex world 2020–2040. TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3–1. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2015. Army Techniques Publications (ATP) 5-0.1, army design methodology. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army, 2016. Field Manual (FM) 7-0, train to win in a complex world. Washington, DC: Headquarters of the Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• US Joint Forces Command, 2004. Doctrinal Implications of Operational Net Assessment (ONA). Pamphlet 4. The Joint Warfighting Center Joint Doctrine Series Pamphlet. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L., 1972. The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of management journal, 15 (4), 407-426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L., 2015. General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Rev ed. New York: George Braziler, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M.M., 2008. Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar