Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments

References

• Al Ramiah, A., Hewstone, M., and Schmid, K., 2011. Social identity and intergroup conflict. Psychological Studies, 56, 44–52. doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0075-0
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C.A. and Bushman, B.J., 2002. Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P.W., 1972. More is different. Science, 177, 393–396. doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoláin, F.N., Haynes, D.F., and Cahn, N., 2011. On the frontlines: gender, war and the post-conflict process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, A., 2017. Autonomy and morality: a self-determination theory discussion of ethics. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 57–61. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Roth, G., and Deci, E.L., 2004. The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: a self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72, 47–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J.W., 1964. An introduction to motivation. Princeton, N.J.,: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R.F. and Monroe, A.E., 2014. Recent research on free will: conceptualizations, beliefs, and processes. In: J.M. Olson and M.P. Zanna, eds.. Advances in experimental social psychology. Waltham, MA: Academic Press, 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R.F. and Leary, M.R., 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A.J., Williams, P.D., and Griffin, S., 2010. Understanding peacekeeping. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Shalom, U., Lehrer, Z., and Ben-Ari, E., 2005. Cohesion during military operations: a field study on combat units in the Al-Aqsa Intifada. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 63–79. doi:10.1177/0095327X05277888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocchiaro, P. and Zamperini, A., 2012. Conformity, obedience, disobedience: the power of the situation. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Braender, M., 2015. Deployment and dehumanisation: a multi-method study of combat soldiers’ loss of empathy. Res Militaris, 5, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M.B., 1991. The Social Self: on Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., 2012. Too fat to fight: obesity is now leading cause of new recruits being rejected by U.S. Army. Daily Mail, 11 December.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, J.G., 2009. The group effect: social cohesion and health outcomes Dordrecht. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, C.J. and Heron, E.A., 2015. Belonging protects against postdeployment depression in military personnel. Depression and Anxiety, 32, 349–355. doi:10.1002/da.22372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, G., 2018. Peacekeepers gone wild: how much more abuse will the UN ignore in Congo. The Globe and Mail, 1 May.
   Google Scholar
• China Global Television Network Africa, 2018. UN chief concerned about under-equipped and unprepared troops.
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, C.V., 1984. On war. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K., 2013. Explaining rape during civil war: cross-national evidence (1980–2009). American Political Science Review, 107, 461–477. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D.A. and Artino, A.R., Jr., 2016. Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50, 997–1014. doi:10.1111/medu.13074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, C.H., 1909. Social organization: a study of the larger mind. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dan-Cohen, M., 1992. Conceptions of choice and conceptions of autonomy. Ethics, 102, 221–243. doi:10.1086/293394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darshani, R.K.N., 2014. A review of personality types and locus of control as moderators of stress and conflict management.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R., 2010. Culture as a weapon system. Middle East Report 255, 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D.K., 2009. The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., 1972. Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113–120. doi:10.1037/h0032355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. and Moller, A.C., 2005. The concept of competence: a starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In: A.J. Elliot and C.S. Dweck, eds. Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, NY, US: Guilford Publications, 579–597.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M., 1985. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M., 1987. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M., 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, T.F., et al., 2017. “Thou Shalt Kill”: practicing self-control supports adherence to personal values when asked to aggress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewall, C.N. and Chester, D.S., 2016. Taming the impulsive beast: understanding the link between self-regulation and aggression. In: E.R. Hirt, J.J. Clarkson, and L. Jia, eds. Self-Regulation and Ego Control. San Diego: Academic Press, 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, S.I. and Ryan, R.M., 2017. The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: a new frontier in self-determination research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 145. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S.I. and Grant-Vallone, E.J., 2002. Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 245–260. doi:10.1023/A:1019637632584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A.J. and Harackiewicz, J.M., 1996. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetherston, B.A., 1995. UN peacekeepers and cultures of violence. Cultural survival quarterly. 19–1.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, A.P. and Rai, T.S., 2014. Virtuous violence: hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, C.V., 1999. Resolving identity tensions: the case of the peacekeeper. Journal of Conflict Studies, 19 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M. and Deci, E.L., 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.v26:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J.S., 2001. War and gender: how gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gözükara, İ. and Şimşek, O.F., 2015. Linking transformational leadership to work engagement and the mediator effect of job autonomy: a study in a Turkish private non-profit university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 963–971. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.274
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., 2012. Cohesion forgotten? Redux. In: M. Salo and R. Sinkko, eds. The science of unit cohesion. Its characteristcs and impacts. Tampere: Juvenes Print Oy, 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. and Vaitkus, M., 1999. Relating cohesion to stress, strain, disintegration, and performance: an organizing framework. Military Psychology, 11, 27–55. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, D., 2009. On killing: the psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. Rev. New York: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Guesterson, H., 2010. The cultural turn in the war on terror. In: J.D. Kelly, et al., eds. Anthropology and global counterinsurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H.C., 2008. The development of British military masculinities through symbolic resources. Culture & Psychology, 14, 305–332. doi:10.1177/1354067X08092636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., 2010. Politicization of sexual violence: from abolitionism to peacekeeping. 1 edn. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, W.D., 1985. Cohesion: the human element in combat. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press. For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S.G.P.O.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P. and Hopton, J., 2005. War, militarism, and masculinities. In: M.S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, and R.W. Connell, eds. Handbook of studies on men & masculinities. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 432–447.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P., 2007. Peacekeepers, masculinities, and sexual exploitation. Men and Masculinities, 10, 99–119. doi:10.1177/1097184X06291896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, J., 2002. “Head down, bergen on, mind in neutral”: the infantry body. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 30, 148–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., 2001. Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In: M.A. Hogg and S.R. Tindale, eds. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 56–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M.A., Hardie, E.A., and Reynolds, K.J., 1995. Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 159–177. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., Legault, L., and Teper, R., 2014. Exploring the mechanisms of self-control improvement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 302–307. doi:10.1177/0963721414534256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, A., 1982. Combat motivation: the behaviour of soldiers in Battle. Boston: Springer Science+Business Media, B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C.L., et al., 2017. A temporary deficiency in self‐control: can heightened motivation overcome this effect? Psychophysiology, 54, 773–779. doi:10.1111/psyp.12832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., 2006. The word of command: communicationand cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 493–512. doi:10.1177/0095327X05283041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., 2013. The combat soldier: infantry tactics and cohesion in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., 2016. On combat effectiveness in the infantry platoon: beyond the primary group thesis. Security Studies, 25, 699–728. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1220205
   Google Scholar
• Kold, C., 2013. New operations - New attitudes? Are soldiers’ attitudes influenced by the objectives of peace operations?. 17, 46.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, M., 2004. In Congo War, even peacekeepers add to horror. The New York Times, 18 December.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. and Reeve, J., 2017. Identifying the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation during task performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, 939–953. doi:10.3758/s13415-017-0524-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legault, L., et al., 2007. On the self-regulation of implicit and explicit prejudice: aSelf -determination theory perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 732–749. doi:10.1177/0146167206298564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legault, L. and Inzlicht, M., 2013. Self-determination, self-regulation, and the brain: autonomy improves performance by enhancing neuroaffective responsiveness to self-regulation failure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 105, 123. doi:10.1037/a0030426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., et al., 2000. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoun, R.J. and Hix, W.M., 2010. Unit cohesion and military performance. In: B.D. Rostker, ed. Sexual orientation and U.S. military personnel policy. An update of RAND’s 1993 study. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 137–165.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoun, R.J., Kier, E., and Belkin, A., 2006. Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat?: anOld question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 646–654. doi:10.1177/0095327X05279181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J.M., et al., 2001. Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M.A. Hogg & S.R. Tindale, eds. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes. Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 400–424.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S.L.A., 1947. Men against fire: the problem of battle command in future war. Washington, New York: Infantry Journal, William Morrow & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Moller, A.C. and Deci, E.L., 2010. Interpersonal control, dehumanization, and violence: A self-determination theory perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 41–53. doi:10.1177/1368430209350318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller, A.C., Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M., 2006. Choice and ego-depletion: the moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167206288008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. , 1996. By force of arms: rape, war, and military culture. Duke Law Journal, 45, 651–781. doi:10.2307/1372997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., et al., 2015. How self-determined choice facilitates performance: A key role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1241–1251. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan Dewall, C., Finkel, J.E., and Denson, T., 2011. Self‐control inhibits aggression. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 458–472. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00363.x
   Google Scholar
• Newsome, B., 2003. The myth of intrinsic combat motivation. Journal of Strategic Studies, 26, 24–46. doi:10.1080/0141-2390312331279678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C.P., Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L., 2010. Self-determination theory and the relation of autonomy to self-regulatory processes and personality development. In: R.H. Hoyle, ed. Handbook of personality and self‐regulation. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Nordås, R. and Rustad, S.C., 2013. Sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers: understanding variation. International Interactions, 39, 511–534. doi:10.1080/03050629.2013.805128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuciari, M., 2006. Models and explanations for military organization: an updated reconsideration. in: G. Caforio, ed. Handbook of the sociology of the military. Boston, MA: Springer US, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., 2010. Ten-year impact study on implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security in Peacekeeping: final report to the United Nations Department of peacekeeping operations. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E.A., 2012. The motivational complexity of choosing: a review of theory and research. In: R.M. Ryan, ed. The Oxford handbook of human motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 248–279.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E.A., Cooper, H., and Robinson, J.C., 2008. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. and Vazire, S., 2007. The self-report method. In: R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, and R.F. Krueger, eds. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 224–239.
   Google Scholar
• Pawiński, M., 2018. Unintended consequences of military cohesion. International Peacekeeping, 25, 293–313. doi:10.1080/13533312.2017.1412261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, G.E., 2015. Tarnished: toxic leadership in the US military. Glastonbury, Universityof Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. and Lee, W., 2019. A neuroscientific perspective on basic psychological needs. Journal of personality, 87, 102–114. doi:10.1111/jopy.12390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R.W. and John, O.P., 1997. The quest for self-insight: theory and research on accuracy and bias in self-perception. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson, and S. Briggs, eds. Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press, 649–679.
   Google Scholar
• Routledge, C. and Vess, M., 2018. Handbook of terror management theory. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R.A., 2003. Cross-cultural considerations in complex peace operations. Negotiation Journal, 19, 29–49. doi:10.1111/nejo.2003.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R.A., 2008. Peacekeeping under fire: culture and intervention. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R.A., 2014. Humanitarian-Military collaboration: social and cultural aspects of interoperability. In: R. Albro and B. Ivey, eds. Cultural awareness in the military: developments and implications for future humanitarian cooperation. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. and Deci, E., 2000a. Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., and Grolnick, W.S., 1995. Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: their relation to development and psychopathology. In: D. Cicchetti, ed. Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 1: theory and methods. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons, 618–655.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2002. Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. In: E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan, eds. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY, US: University of Rochester Press, 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2004. Autonomy is no illusion: self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In: J. Greenberg, S.L. Koole, and T. Pyszczynski, eds. Handbook of experimental existential psychology. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 449–479.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2008. Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In: R.M. Ryan and E.L. Deci, eds. Handbook of personality: theory and research. 3 ed. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 654–678.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., 2014. The Oxford handbook of human motivation. Second. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., and Vansteenkiste, M., 2016. Autonomy and autonomy disturbances in self‐development and psychopathology: research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process. In: D. Cicchetti, ed. Developmental psychopathology: theory and method. 3 ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 385–438.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2000b. The darker and brighter sides of human existence: basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2006. Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L., 2017. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., Kuhl, J., and Deci, E.L., 1997. Nature and autonomy: an organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, B.A. and Holmes-Eber, P., Marine Corps University (U.S.), 2008. Operational culture for the warfighter: principles and applications. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps University.
   Google Scholar
• Sanday, P.R., 2007. Fraternity gang rape: sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York, NY, US: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sasson-Levy, O., 2008. Individual bodies, collective state interests: thecase of Israeli Combat Soldiers. Men and Masculinities, 10, 296–321. doi:10.1177/1097184X06287760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevinc, G., Gurvit, H., and Spreng, R.N., 2017. Salience network engagement with the detection of morally laden information. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12, 1118–1127. doi:10.1093/scan/nsx035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B., et al., 2000. Perceived combat readiness as collective efficacy: individual- and group-level analysis. Military Psychology, 12, 105–119. doi:10.1207/S15327876MP1202_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E.A. and Janowitz, M., 1948. Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 280–315. doi:10.1086/265951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G.L., 2007. The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33, 286–295. doi:10.1177/0095327X06294173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G.L., 2011. Key questions and challenges to the standard model of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 37, 448–468. doi:10.1177/0095327X11398451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slemp, G.R., et al., 2018. Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and emotion, 42, 706–724. doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soeters, J.L., Winslow, D.J., and Weibull, A., 2006. Military Culture. In: G. Caforio, ed. Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Boston, MA: Springer US, 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., and Pyszczynski, T., 1991. A terror management theory of social behavior: the psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In: M.P. Zanna, ed.. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 93–159.
   Google Scholar
• Stouffer, S.A., 1949. The American soldier Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stucke, T.S. and Baumeister, R.F., 2006. Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 1–13. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucko, D., 2008. Innovation or Inertia: the U.S. Military and the Learning of Counterinsurgency. Orbis, 52, 290–310. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2008.01.008
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly, 2007. Special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse: report of the Secretary-General. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly, 2008. Special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse: report of the Secretary-General
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly, 2009. Special measures for protection from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse: report of the Secretary-General
   Google Scholar
• Un. Office of Internal Oversight Services, 2005. Investigation into allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse in the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
   Google Scholar
• Un. Office of Internal Oversight Services, 2007. Report of the office of internal oversight services on its investigation into allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse in the Ituri region (Bunia) in the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R.J., 1997. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: M.P. Zanna, ed.. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 271–360.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., et al., 2005. To Be(long) or Not to Be(long): social identification in organizational contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 189–218. doi:10.3200/MONO.131.3.189-218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V.H., 1964. Work and motivation. New York,: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Watola, D. and Woycheshin, D., 2016. Negative leadership: international perspectives. Ottawa: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wessely, S., 2006. Twentieth-century theories on combat motivation and breakdown. Journal of Contemporary History, 41, 268–286. doi:10.1177/0022009406062067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, S., 2004. Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: a gendered analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L., Millen, R.A., and Kolditz, T., 2003. Why they fight: combat motivation in the Iraq War. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
   Google Scholar
• Zurbriggen, E.L., 2010. Rape, war, and the socialization of masculinity: why our refusal to give up war ensures that rape cannot be eradicated. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 538–549. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar