AI, autonomy, and airpower: the end of pilots?

References

• Ahmadi, K. and Alireza, K., 2007. Stress and job satisfaction among air force military pilots. Journal of social sciences, 3, 159–163. doi:10.3844/jssp.2007.159.163
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G., 2019. Understanding China’s AI strategy: clues to Chinese strategic thinking on artificial intelligence and national security. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. and Chan, T., 2017. Artificial intelligence and national security. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, G., 2016. British drones “will always be under human control”. UK Defence Journal. URL https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/british-drones-will-always-human-control/ [Accessed 27 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, J. and Sauer, F., 2017. Autonomous weapon systems and strategic stability. Survival, 59, 117–142. doi:10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. and Waxman, M.C., 2017. Debating autonomous weapon systems, their ethics, and their regulation under international law. In: R. Brownsword, E. Scotford, and K. Yeung, eds. The oxford handbook of law, regulation and technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1097–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R.C., 2010. The case for ethical autonomy in unmanned systems. Journal of military ethics, 9, 332–341. doi:10.1080/15027570.2010.536402
   Google Scholar
• Army Chief Warrant Officer 2006 3 William T. Flanigan [WWW document]. Military Times, URL https://thefallen.militarytimes.com/army-chief-warrant-officer-3-william-t-flanigan/1941909 [Accessed 13 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Axe, D., 2018. What’s Driving the U.S. Air force pilot shortage? [WWW Document]. Foreign Policy, URL https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04/whats-driving-the-u-s-air-force-pilot-shortage/ [Accessed 26 February 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, K. and Payne, K., 2016. Strategy in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of strategic studies, 39, 793–819. doi:10.1080/01402390.2015.1088838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M.R. and Mount, M.K., 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/peps.1991.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boobier, T., 2018. Advanced Analytics and AI: impact, implementation, and the future of work. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bor, R., et al., Eds., 2017. Pilot mental health assessment and support: a practitioner’s guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbonnière, M., 2004. Law of armed conflict (LOAC) and the neutralisation of satellites or ius in bello satellitis. Journal of conflict and security law, 9, 43–69. doi:10.1093/jcsl/9.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M.-C., Lee, T.-H., and Lung, F.-W., 2018. Personality characteristics of fighter pilots and ground personnel. Military Psychology, 30, 70–78. doi:10.1080/08995605.2017.1420977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., et al., 2019. Brain-inspired automated visual object discovery and detection. PNAS, 116, 96–105. doi:10.1073/pnas.1802103115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., 2017. Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare. London: Chatham House for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J., 2017. Air Force secretary warns pilot shortage worsens, people “burning out.”
   Google Scholar
• de Haas, M., 2003. The use of Russian air power in the second chechen war. The royal air force air power review, 6, 35–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, B., 2018. What is the AI winter? [WWW Document]. TechTalks, URL https://bdtechtalks.com/2018/11/12/artificial-intelligence-winter-history/ [Accessed 24 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Doward, J., 2018. Britain funds research into drones that decide who they kill, says report. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Enduring Freedom Casualties - Special Reports [WWW Document], 2008. CNN. URL http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2004/oef.casualties/page4.html [Accessed 13 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, N., et al., 2016. Genetic fuzzy based artificial intelligence for unmanned combat aerial vehicle control in simulated air combat missions. Journal of Defense Management, 6, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, C., 2005. Pilot of U.S. spy plane killed [WWW Document]. CNN, URL http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/06/22/spy.plane.crash/index.html [Accessed 13 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F., 2010. U-2s challenge pilots’ endurance in the air [WWW Document]. Stars and Stripes, URL https://www.stripes.com/news/u-2s-challenge-pilots-endurance-in-the-air-1.97772 [Accessed 17 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, S.S., 2008. The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: an experimental approach. American political science review, 102, 95–106. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz, B., 2002. China deploys drones from Israel. Washington Times.
   Google Scholar
• Geske, R.C., 2015. 27th Joseph T. Nall Report: General Aviation Accidents in 2015 (Text). Frederick, Maryland: AOPA Air Safety Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Getting to grips with military robotics, 2018. The economist.
   Google Scholar
• Gigova, R., 2017. Who Putin thinks will rule the world [WWW Document]. CNN. URL https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/01/world/putin-artificial-intelligence-will-rule-world/index.html [Accessed 4 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Gilli, A. and Gilli, M., 2016. The diffusion of drone warfare? Industrial, organizational, and infrastructural constraints. Security studies, 25, 50–84. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1134189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L.S., 1997. Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greg, 2015. Advancing the science and acceptance of autonomy for future defense systems. Washington: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hammes, T.X., 2016. Technologies converge and power diffuses: the evolution of small, smart, and cheap weapons. Washington, D.C: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, J., 2018. Spending on unmanned systems set to grow. National Defense Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., 2018. Control of the air. In: J.A. Olsen, ed. Routledge handbook of air power. London: Routledge, 82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, G. and Mahnken, T., 2003. Military diffusion in nineteenth-century Europe: the Napoleonic and prussian military systems. In: E.O. Goldman and L.C. Eliason, eds. The diffusion of military technology and ideas. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 205–242.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, J.M., Sharma, A., and Watts, D.J., 2017. Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science, 355, 486–488. doi:10.1126/science.aal3856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M., 2018. Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power. Texas national security review, 1, 36–57.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch, 2019. Germany: support a Ban on ‘Killer Robots’ [WWW Document]. Human Rights Watch. URL https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/03/14/germany-support-ban-killer-robots [Accessed 28 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Kaag, J. and Kreps, S., 2014. Drone warfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kainikara, S., 2018. Indian air power. In: J.A. Olsen, ed. Routledge handbook of air power. London: Routledge, 327–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, A., 2018. Lethal autonomous weapons systems: can the international community agree on an approach? Presented at the Uehiro-Carnegie-Oxford Ethics Conference, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, O., 1940. Prediction in the social sciences. Philosophy of science, 7, 492–498. doi:10.1086/286658
   Google Scholar
• Killer Robots [WWW Document], 2019. Campaign to stop killer robots. URL https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/ [Accessed 28 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, E., 2019. AI in humanities: teaching machines to read and interpret classical texts [WWW Document]. SuperPosition. URL https://sci-techmaven.io/superposition/tech/ai-in-humanities-teaching-machines-to-read-and-interpret-classical-texts-sJtNArKpAk221MnmG1hqig/ [Accessed 4 april 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R., 2005. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Lachow, I., 2017. The upside and downside of swarming drones. Bulletin of the atomic scientists, 73, 96–101. doi:10.1080/00963402.2017.1290879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Lillicrap, T., and Kalakrishnan, M., 2016. How robots can acquire new skills from their shared experience. Google AI Blog, URL http://ai.googleblog.com/2016/10/how-robots-can-acquire-new-skills-from.html
   Google Scholar
• Mao, J., et al., 2019. The neuro-symbolic concept learner: interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision. Presented at the International Conference on Learning Representations.
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, A., 1996. Searle’s abstract argument against strong AI. Synthese, 108, 391–419. doi:10.1007/BF00413696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, S. 2008, Chief warrant officer, United States Army [WWW Document], Arlington National Cemetery, URL http://arlingtoncemetery.net/michael-slebodnik.htm [Accessed 13 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Morris, L.J. and Heginbotham, E., 2016. From theory to practice: people’s liberation army air force aviation training at the operational unit. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, A., 2018. Ensuring sufficient skilled military personnel. London: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, D., McKenney, D., and Railsback, P., 2013. Operational use of flight path management systems. Washington, D.C: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Niiler, E., 2019. Can AI be a fair judge in court? Estonia thinks so. Wired.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M., 2013. U.S. Pilot killed in jet crash in Afghanistan [WWW Document]. IDGA, URL https://www.idga.org/special-operations/news/u-s-pilot-killed-in-jet-crash-in-afghanistan [Accessed 13 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Osinga, F.P.B., 2007. Science, strategy and war: the strategic theory of John Boyd. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, K., 2017. Air force official details ‘National Aircrew Crisis’ [WWW Document]. U.S. Department of Defense, URL https://dod.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1134560/air-force-official-details-national-aircrew-crisis/ [Accessed 27 February 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Payne, K., 2018. Artificial intelligence: a revolution in strategic affairs? Survival, 60, 7–32. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1518374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesing, M., 2016. The aerial tankers that helped shrink the globe [WWW Document]. BBC, URL http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161220-the-aerial-tankers-that-helped-shrink-the-globe [Accessed 19 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, W., 2007. Media investigation process. Aero quarterly, 2, 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rintala, H., et al., 2015. Relationships between physical fitness, demands of flight duty, and musculoskeletal symptoms among military pilots. Military medicine, 180, 1233–1238. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rise of the tech workers [WWW Document], 2019. Campaign to stop killer robots. URL https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/2019/01/rise-of-the-tech-workers/ [Accessed 28 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, L.R., 2003. The dream of civilized warfare: world war: flying aces and the American imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Air Force [WWW Document], 2019. URL https://www.raf.mod.uk/recruitment/roles/roles-finder/aircrew/pilot [Accessed 19 February 2019].
   Google Scholar
• RQ-4 Global Hawk [WWW Document], 2014. U.S. Air Force. URL https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104516/rq-4-global-hawk/ [Accessed 17 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P., 2018a. Army of none: autonomous weapons and the future of war. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P., 2018b. How swarming will change warfare. Bulletin of the atomic scientists, 74, 385–389. doi:10.1080/00963402.2018.1533209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, T.P., 2018. The problem with pilots: how physicians, engineers, and airpower enthusiasts redefined flight. Baltimore: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, D.E., 1975. Railroads and rifles: soldiers, technology and the unification of Germany. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Skaine, R., 1999. Women at war: gender issues of Americans in combat. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R., 2016. Robots and respect: assessing the case against autonomous weapon systems. Ethics & international affairs, 30, 93–116. doi:10.1017/S0892679415000647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutyagin, I., 2018. Russian air power. In: J.A. Olsen, ed. Routledge handbook of air power. London: Routledge, 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Tanz, O., 2017. Can artificial intelligence identify pictures better than humans? [WWW Document]. Entrepreneur. URL https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/283990 [Accessed 21 March 2019].
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force [WWW Document], 2019a. URL https://www.airforce.com/frequently-asked-questions/medical/how-bad-can-my-vision-be-to-qualify-for-the-air-force [Accessed 19 February 2019].
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Air Force [WWW Document], 2019b. URL https://www.airforce.com/ [Accessed 27 september 2019].
   Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Defence, 2018. Joint Concept Note 1/18, Human-Machine Teaming.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office, 2018. Military personnel: DOD needs to reevaluate fighter pilot workforce requirements. Washington, D.C: United States Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Unmanned systems integrated roadmap FY2011-2036, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Unmanned systems integrated roadmap FY2013-2038, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, J., 2019. Promotion rates improving for Air Force drone pilots, GAO says [WWW Document]. Stars and Stripes. URL https://www.stripes.com/news/promotion-rates-improving-for-air-force-drone-pilots-gao-says-1.567839 [Accessed 14 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., 2017a. A Plan for Keeping the U.S. Air Force’s Best Pilots in Service [WWW Document]. The Heritage Foundation. URL https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/plan-keeping-the-us-air-forces-best-pilots-service [Accessed 20 February 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., 2017b. Independent capability assessment of U.S. Air force reveals readiness level below carter administration hollow force. Washington, D. C: The Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Venosa, A., 2016. Breaking point: how many G-forces can humans tolerate? [WWW Document]. Medical Daily. URL https://www.medicaldaily.com/breaking-point-whats-strongest-g-force-humans-can-tolerate-369246 [Accessed 28 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Wise, J., 2019. The Boeing 737 Max and the problems autopilot can’t solve. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J., Shurlow, C., and Haynes, J., 2015. Objective versus subjective military pilot selection methods in the United States of America. OH: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson AFB.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J., 2018. The world’s oldest fighter pilot retires at 66. CNN.
   Google Scholar
• Zegart, A., 2018. Cheap fights, credible threats: the future of armed drones and coercion. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1–41. doi:10.1080/01402390.2018.1439747
   Google Scholar