A Symposium – debating ‘surrogate warfare’ and the transformation of war

References

• Andres, R.,.B., Wills, C., and Grifith, T.,.E., 2005. Winning with allies: the strategic value of the Afghan model. International security, 30 (3), 124–160. doi:10.1162/016228805775969591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, K., et al., 2018. Saudis’ image makers: a troll army and a twitter insider. The New York Times, 20 October.
   Google Scholar
• Clymer, C., 2019. As a US military veteran, Trump’s betrayal of the Kurds in Syria horrifies me. The Independent, 09 October.
   Google Scholar
• Cormac, R. and Aldrich, R.J., 2018. Grey is the new black: covert action and implausible deniability. International affairs, 94 (3), 477–494. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming-Bruce, N., 2018. War crime reports on Yemen accuses Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. The New York Times, 28 April.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Science Board, 2016. Summer study on autonomy. Washington, department of defense, office of the under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics. Washington: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, K., 2018. Investigating Houthi Claims of Drone Attack on UAE Airports. Bellingcat.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, L., 2019. Israel meets suspected Hamas cyber-attack with immediate air strike. The Telegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenkot, G. and Siboni, G., 2019. The campaign between the wars: how Israel rethought its strategy to counter Iran’s Malign regional influence. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, J., 2019. AP explains: how Yemen’s rebels increasingly deploy drones. Associated Press, 14 May.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, F., 2019. Saudi oil facility attacks: race on to restore supplies. BBC, 20 September
   Google Scholar
• Hager, E. and Mazzetti, M., 2015. Emirates secretly sends colombian Mercenaries to Yemen fight. The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, B., 2010. Small wars in the age of Clausewitz: the watershed between partisan war and people’s war. Journal of strategic studies, 33 (1), 139–162. doi:10.1080/01402391003603623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G., 2012. My Enemy’s Enemy: proxy Warfare in International Politics. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2012. Micro-level studies of violence in Civil War: refining and extending the control-collaboration model. Terrorism and political violence, 24 (4), 658–668. doi:10.1080/09546553.2012.701986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlén, N., 2017. The legacy of foreign patrons: external state support and conflict recurrence. Journal of peace research, 54 (4), 499–512. doi:10.1177/0022343317700465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, A., 2016a. Surrogate war and the illusion of State-Centrism. Defence-In-Depth.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, A., 2016b. Externalizing the burden of war: the Obama Doctrine and US foreign policy in the Middle East. International affairs, 92 (1), 97–113. doi:10.1111/inta.2016.92.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, A. and Rickli, J.-M., 2019a. Surrogate warfare: the art of war in the 21st century. Defence studies, 18 (2), 113–130. doi:10.1080/14702436.2018.1429218.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, A. and Rickli, J.-M., 2019b. Surrogate warfare. The transformation of war in the twenty-first century. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, C., 2019a. Israel’s new front in the fight against Iran. Middle East Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, C., 2019b. Russia, Iran, and the competition to Shape Syria’s future. Middle East Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, T. and Robertson, N., 2019. Source: “High probability” Saudi attack launched from Iranian base near Iraq. CNN, 17 September.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, T., Sukla, S., and Ward, C., 2019. Putin’s private army. CNN.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzetti, M., Goldman, A., and Schmidt, M.S., 2017. Behind the sudden death of a $1 billion secret C.I.A. war in Syria. The New York Times, 02 August.
   Google Scholar
• McGurk, B., 2019. Trump said he beat ISIS. Instead, he’s giving it new life. The Washington Post, 18 January.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., 2019. Saudi Arabia wants to stop my work: activists are facing new threats for continuing Jamal Khashoggi’s efforts. TIME, 16 May.
   Google Scholar
• Muhsin, D., 2019. Houthi use of drones delivers potent message in Yemen War. The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, A., 2013. Proxy warfare. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, H., 2019. Facebook shuts down first disinformation campaign linked to Saudi government. Financial Times, 01 August.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., 2004. The ‘New Wars’ debate: A historical perspective is needed. Security dialogue, 35 (2), 173–189. doi:10.1177/0967010604044975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakford, S. and Salisbury, P., 2016.Yemen: the Graveyard of the Obama doctrine, The Atlantic, 23 September.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, N. and Secrieru, S., 2018. Hacks, leaks and disruption: Russian cyber strategies. European Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Papers, No.148.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2016. Proxy agents, auxiliary forces, and sovereign defection: assessing the outcomes of using non-state actors in civil conflicts. Southeast European and black sea studies, 16 (1), 91–111. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1148416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2018. A structural-relations analysis of party dynamics in proxy wars. International relations, 32 (4), 449–467. doi:10.1177/0047117818802436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., et al. 2019a. Conceptualising the regular-irregular engagement: the strategic value of proxies and auxiliaries in wars amongst the people. In: D. Brown et al., ed. War amongst the people. Havant: Howgate Publishing Limited, 100–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2019b. Towards a typology of non-state actors in ‘hybrid warfare’: proxy, auxiliary, surrogate and affiliated forces. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Online First. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1656600.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, H. and Britton, B., 2019. Turkey launches military offensive in Syria, days after Trump announced pullback of US troops. CNN, October 10.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, R., 2014. Horror, hubris and humanity: the international engagement with Africa, 1914–2014. International affairs, 90 (1), 143–166. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D., 2014. Obama calls for new regional talks to try to bring peace to the Middle East. The Guardian, 24 September.
   Google Scholar
• Roff, H., 2019. The frame problem. The AI “arms race” isn’t one. Bulleting of the Atomic Scientists, 29 April.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, J. and Bakhsh, S., 2019. Analysis: aden conflict reveals Saudi-UAE rift over Yemen. BBC Monitoring, 5 September.
   Google Scholar
• Safi, M., 2019. Iran denies launching drone attack on Saudi oil facility. The Guardian, 15 September.
   Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., 2009. Rebels without borders: transnational insurgencies in world politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., 2010. The delegation of war to rebels. Journal of conflict resolution, 54 (3), 493–515. doi:10.1177/0022002709357890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Akca, B., 2016. States in disguise: causes of state support for rebel groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, P., 2019. Killer Apps: the real dangers of an AI arms race. Foreign Affairs, May/June,
   Google Scholar
• Scheipers, S., 2015. Auxiliaries at war in the Middle East. Survival, 57 (4), 121–138. doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1068569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, E., Fassihi, F., and Kirkpatrick, D., 2019. Saudi oil attack photos implicate Iran, U.S. says: Trump hints at military action. The New York Times, 15 September,
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J. and Gerring, J., 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political research quarterly, 61 (2), 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2012. States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on politics, 10 (2), 243–264. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, D., 2019. How do we move beyond ‘proxy’ paralysis? New America, 7 March.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H., 2009. One war, joint warfare. The RUSI journal, 154 (4), 20–24. doi:10.1080/03071840903216437.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H. and Scheipers, S., 2013. The changing character of war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., 2015. Problems with the Kurds as proxies against Islamic State: insights from the siege of Kobane. Small wars & insurgencies, 26 (6), 865–885. doi:10.1080/09592318.2015.1095844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turak, N. (2019). Drone and missile debris prove Iranian role in Aramco attack, Saudi defense ministry claims. CNBC, 18 September.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, D.H. and Marks, T.A., 2018. Violence in context: mapping the strategies and operational art of irregular warfare. Contemporary security policy, 39 (2), 206–233. doi:10.1080/13523260.2018.1432922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votel, J. and Dent, E., 2019. The danger of abandoning our partners. The Atlantic, 08 October.
   Google Scholar
• Votel, J. and Keravouri, E., 2018. The By-With-Through operational approach. Joint force quarterly, 89 (2), 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, T., 2018. Vicarious warfare: the counterproductive consequences of modern American military practice. Contemporary security policy, 39 (2), 181–205. doi:10.1080/13523260.2017.1393201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, T., 2019. Strategic narratives and US surrogate warfare. Survival: global politics and strategy, 61 (1), 161–178. doi:10.1080/00396338.2019.1568049.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, C., 2019. Bringing the outside in: the limits of theoretical fragmentation and pluralism in IR theory. Politics, 39 (1), 64–81. doi:10.1177/0263395718815784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar