Charting great power progress toward a lethal autonomous weapon system demonstration point

References

• Allen, G.C., 2019. Understanding china’s AI strategy: clues to Chinese strategic thinking on artificial intelligence and national security. Washington D.C.: Centre for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, G.T., 2017. Destined for war: can America and China escape Thucydide's trap?. Brunswick: Scribe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, J. and Sauer, F., 2017. Autonomous weapon systems and strategic stability. Survival, 59, 117–142. doi:10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. 2019. President trump’s executive order on artificial intelligence. Lawfare [ Online]. [Accessed 28 Feb 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, V. and Verbruggen, M., 2017. Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. and Singh, P., 2018. China’s technology transfer strategy: how chinese investments in emerging technology enable a strategic competitor to access the crown jewels of U.S. Innovation. Mountain View, C.A.: Defense Innovation Unit Experimental.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, R.J., 2015. Terrorist and insurgent unmanned aerial vehicles: use, potentials, and military implications. Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle Barracks, P.A.: US Army War College.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W., 2018. Statement before the house armed services committee subcommittee on emerging threats and capabilities - “Chinese advances in emerging technologies and their implications for U.S. national security”. Testimony to House armed services committee subcommittee on emerging threats and capabilities. Washington D.C.: Rayburn House Office Building.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, W.A., et al., 2018. A National Machine Intelligence Strategy for the United States. CSIS Technology Policy Program. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Center, A. C. I., 2017. Robotic and unmanned systems strategy. Fort Eustis, V.A.: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.
   Google Scholar
• chase, M.S., et al., 2015. Emerging trends in China’s development of unmanned systems. Santa Monica California: Rand National Defense Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Conn, A., 2016. The Problem of Defining Autonomous Weapons. Future of Life Institute [Online]. Available from: https://futureoflife.org/2016/11/30/problem-defining-autonomous-weapons/ [Accessed 19 Sep 2018].
   Google Scholar
• CornilliE, C. 2018. Can pentagon bridge artificial intelligence’s ‘Valley of Death’? Bloomberg Government [Online]. Available from: https://about.bgov.com/news/can-pentagon-bridge-artificial-intelligences-valley-of-death/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosfutureofwork&stream=future [Accessed 14 Sep 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Cronk, T.M., 2018. Artificial intelligence experts address getting capabilities to warfighters.12 February 2019. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Cronk, T.M., 2019. DOD unveils its artificial intelligence strategy. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Defence, D. O., 2012. Directive 3000.09.Washington D.C.: United States Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Defense, D. O, 2019. Summary of the 2018 department of defense artificial intelligence strategy: harnessing AI to advance our security and prosperity. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Development, C. A. D. C. 2018. Joint concept note 1/18 human machine teaming. Joint Concept Note. U.K. Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Ellman, J., Samp, L., and Coll, G., 2017. Assessing the third offset strategy. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gettinger, D., 2016. Drone spending in the fiscal year 2017 defense budget. New York: Centre for the Study of the Drone at Bard College.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, E.O. and Andres, R.B., 1999. Systemic effects of military innovation and diffusion. Security studies, 8, 79–125. doi:10.1080/09636419908429387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, A., 2006. The future of military innovation studies. The journal of strategic studies, 29.5, 905-934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwell, D. 2018. Defense department pledges billions toward artificial intelligence research. The Washington Post, 7 September 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C., 2010. The diffusion of military power: causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400835102
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C., 2018. Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power. Texas national security review, 1, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M.C., 2016a. The ethics & morality of robotic warfare: assessing the debate over autonomous weapons. Daedalus, 145, 25–36. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M.C., 2016b. Why words matter: the real world consequences of defining autonomous weapons systems. Temple international and comparative law journal, 30, 85.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M.C., et al., 2018. Strategic competition in an era of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence and international security. Washington D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M.C., 2019. When speed kills: autonomous weapon systems, deterrence, and stability. journal of strategic studies, 42, 764–788. Forthcoming. doi:10.1080/01402390.2019.1621174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourihan, M., 2019. The FY 2020 budget request: security R&D. Washington D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC, 2014. Autonomous weapon systems: technical, military, legal and humanitarian aspects. at Expert meeting. Versoix Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• ICRC, 2016. Autonomous weapon systems implications of increasing autonomy in the critical functions of weapons.at Expert meeting. Versoix, Switzerland: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, K., Gallasch, G.E., and Jordans, J., 2016. Automated and autonomous systems for combat service support: scoping study and technology prioritisation. Edinburgh SA: Defence Science and Technology Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, M. 2019. DeepMind’s AI to take on human starcraft II players on battle.net. PC Magazine Australia, 11 July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E.B., 2017. Battlefield singularity: artificial intelligence, military revolution, and china’s future military power. Washington D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E.B., 2018. China’s AI Giants can’t say no to the party. Foreign policy, 2 (August), 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E.B., 2019. Chinese military innovation in artificial intelligence. Washington D.C.: Center for a New American security.
   Google Scholar
• Kearn, K. 2018. DoD autonomy roadmap: autonomy community of interest. NDIA 19th Annual Science & Engineering Technology Conference. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D., 2018. Unmanned Systems & Robotics in the FY2019 Defense Budget. Association For Unmanned Vehicle Systems International.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A., 2009. Automating war: the need for regulation. Contemporary security policy, 30, 172–193. doi:10.1080/13523260902760397
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., 2018. Experiment over: pentagon’s tech hub gets a vote of confidence. Defense NEws, 9 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar, A., Xia, L., and Tang, T.B., 2015. Vehicle detection techniques for collision avoidance systems: a review. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 16, 2318–2338. doi:10.1109/TITS.2015.2409109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raska, M. Strategic transformation and military modernization in the Asia-Pacific Region (Draft Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. P., 1988. New ways of war: understanding military innovation. International security. 13.1. 134-168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., 2018. Human-machine teaming for future ground forces. Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Sayler, K., 2015. A world of proliferated drones. Washington D.C.: Center for a New American security.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P.W., 2009. Wired for war: the robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R., 2015. Twenty seconds to comply: autonomous weapons systems and the recognition of surrender. International law studies series. US naval war college, 91, 699.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, N., et al., 2018. Trends in world military expenditure, may 2017. SIPRI fact sheet. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, M.G. and Martinage, R.C., 2004. The revolution in war.Washington D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wassmuth, D. and Blair, D. 2018. Loyal Wingman, Flocking, And Swarming: new Models Of Distributed Airpower. War on the Rocks [Online]. Available from: https://warontherocks.com/2018/02/loyal-wingman-flocking-swarming-new-models-distributed-airpower/[Accessed 21 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Work, R.O. and Grant, G., 2019. Beating the Americans at their own game: an offset strategy with chinese characteristics. Washington D.C.: Centre for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, A., and Galliott, J., 2018. Closing the capability gap: asean military modernization during the dawn of autonomous weapon systems. Asian security. 1-20. doi:10.1080/14799855.2018.1516639
   Google Scholar