An application of a combined framework to set the future direction of the Norwegian Home Guard

References

• Ackoff, R. L., 1974. Redesigning the future. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Almäng, J., 2019. War, vagueness and hybrid War. Defence Studies, 19 (2), 189–204. doi:10.1080/14702436.2019.1597631
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., E. D. Carlström, B. Ahgren, and J. M. Berlin, 2014. Managing boundaries at the accident scene – a qualitative study of collaboration exercises. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3 (1), 77–94. doi:10.1108/IJES-02-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Knutsen, E., and N. C. Roberts. 2015. Strategic design for NORSOF 2025. Technical Report NPS-DA-15-001. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, J. M., and E. D. Carlström, 2008. The 90-second collaboration: A critical study of collaboration exercises at extensive accident sites. Journal of Contigencies and Crisis Management, 16 (4), 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerga, K. I., and G. Gjeseth. 2010. Heimevernet og Hæren. Landforsvaret stykkevis og delt – eller helt? Oslo Files on Defence and Security 02/2010. Oslo: Institutt for forsvarsstudier.
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, O., and M. Håkenstad, 2017. Reluctant reformers: The economic roots of military change in Norway, 1990–2015. Defence Studies, 17 (1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1256210
   Google Scholar
• Brox, K. H., 1996. Heimevernet 50 år. 1946–1996. Oslo: J.W. Cappelens forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D.O'Rourke, A. M.Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. von Winterfeldt, 2003. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19 (4), 733–752. doi:10.1193/1.1623497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R., 1992. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8 (2), 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Calha, J. M. 2015. Hybrid warfare? NATO's new strategic challenge. NATO Parliamentary Assembly Defence and Security Committee General Report 166 DSC 15 E bis.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, E. J., and W. Weil. 1998. Wicked problems: Naming the pain in organizations. USA: Reading Room Research Center, 3M Meeting Network.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell, 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, T. H., and S. Blake, 1991. Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Perspectives, 5 (3), 45–56. doi:10.5465/ame.1991.4274465
   Google Scholar
• DCDC. 2018. Global strategic trends. The future starts today. London.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., 1970. The research act. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., 2012. Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6 (2), 80–88. doi:10.1177/1558689812437186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorley, S., S. Holcomb, P. Klebahn, K. Segovia, and J. Utley. 2018. Design thinking bootleg. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M., 2016. Hybrid, ambiguous, and non-linear? How new is Russia's “New way of war”? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27 (2), 282–301. doi:10.1080/09592318.2015.1129170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glærum, S., and A. C. Hennum, 2016. Analytical support to Norwegian long-term defence planning. Vojenské Rozhledy – Czech Military Review, 25 (Mimořádné čislo), 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss, 1967. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glen, R., C. Suciu, C. Baughn, and R. Anson, 2015. Teaching design thinking in business schools. The International Journal of Management Education, 13 (2), 182–192. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz, K., M. Goniewicz, and F. M. Burkle, 2019. The territorial defence force in disaster response in Poland: Civil–military collaboration during a state of emergency. Sustainability, 11 (2), 487. doi:10.3390/su11020487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln, 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., 2008. Questioning qualitative research: Critical essays. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. J. 2004. En studie idoktrineutformingsprosesser: Doktrineutforming iHeimevernet 1970–2000. Hovedfagsoppgave, Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A. M., 1992. Hexagons for systems thinking. European Journal of Operational Research, 59 (1), 220–230. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hove, K. H., E. Berg-Knutsen, P. K. Dahl, and N. Rones. 2019. Heimevernet mot 2030: Framtidig rolle og oppgaver. FFI-rapport 19/01682. Kjeller: Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt.
   Google Scholar
• Høyland, S. A., 2018. Exploring and modeling the societal safety and societal security concepts – a systematic review, empirical study and key implications. Safety Science, 110, 7–22. December. Special Issue on societal safety, critical infrastructure reliability and related intersectoral governance. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. P., 2019. A brief history of military design thinking. Medium, 6 February.
   Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4), 602–611. doi:10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., J. Woodilla, and M. Çetinkaya, 2013. Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22 (2), 121–146. doi:10.1111/caim.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., 2011. Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3 (3), 285–306. doi:10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., 2012. Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4 (2), 129–148. doi:10.2752/175470812X13281948975413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauder, M., 2009. Systemic operational design: Freeing operational planning from the shackles of linearity. Canadian Military Journal, 9 (4), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba, 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, D. A., and M. L. Tushman, 1980. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9 (2), 35–51. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO. 2017. The NATO alternative analysis handbook. NATO.
   Google Scholar
• Norheim-Martinsen, P. M., 2016. New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations. Defence Studies, 16 (3), 312–326. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1195234
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection. 2019. Analyser av krisescenarioer 2019ʹ. Tønsberg: Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Intelligence Service. 2020. Focus 2020. The Norwegian Intelligence Service's assessment of current security challenge. Oslo: Norwegian Armed Forces.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Defence, and Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 2018. Support and cooperation, a description of the total defence in Norway. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Security Authority. 2020. Risiko 2020. Krafttak for et sikrere Norge. Sandvika: Norwegian National Security Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Police Security Service. 2020. Annual threat assessment 2020ʹ. Oslo: Norwegian Police Security Service.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, R. W., and M. K. Lindell, 2003. Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. 27 (4), 336–350.
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, E., and P. Cullen, 2016. What is hybrid warfare? Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Policy Brief, 2016 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T., 2013. Wicked problems. Modelling social messes with morphological analysis. Acta Morphologica Generalis, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber, 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. 2000. Organizational systems framework model. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhead, J., 1996. What's the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces, 26 (6), 117–131. doi:10.1287/inte.26.6.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, V. P., and S. K. Fixson, 2013. Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19–33. doi:10.1111/jpim.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, H., J. Mäkelä, P. Luokkala, and K. Virrantaus, 2013. Developing shared situational awareness for emergency management. Safety Science, 55, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. C., and B. Smith, 2013. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szymański, P., and J. Gotkowska. 2015. The Baltic states' territorial defence forces in the face of hybrid threats. OSW Commentary 165. Warsaw: OSW Centre for Eastern Studies
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, L., and V. Eatough, 2018. Hermeneutics: Interpretation, understanding and sense-making. In Cassell, C., A. Cunliffe, and G. Grandy, edited by. The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions. London: Sage, 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Vego, M., 2013. On military creativity. Joint Force Quarterly, 70 (3), 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Veljovski, G., N. Taneski, and M. Dojchinovski, 2017. The danger of “hybrid warfare” from a sophisticated adversary: The Russian “hybridity” in the Ukrainian conflict. Defense & Security Analysis, 33 (4), 292–307. doi:10.1080/14751798.2017.1377883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, and L. Sechrest, 1966. Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J. J., 2017. Life in the “gray zone”: Observations for contemporary strategists. Defense & Security Analysis, 33 (2), 106–114. doi:10.1080/14751798.2017.1310702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wither, J. K., 2020. Back to the future? Nordic total defence concepts. Defence Studies, 20 (1), 61–81. doi:10.1080/14702436.2020.1718498
   Google Scholar
• Wolbers, J., and K. Boersma, 2013. The common operational picture as collective sensemaking. Journal of Contigencies and Crisis Management, 21 (4), 186–199. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar