Strategic culture as a (discursive) institution: a proposal for falsifiable theoretical model with computational operationalization

References

• Akin Unver, H. 2018. “Computational International Relations: What Can Programming, Coding and Internet Research Do for the Discipline?” arXiv Preprint arXiv 1803: 00105.
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E., and K. M. Ramsey. 2010. “Institutional Theory.” In Handbook of Politics, edited by Leicht, K. T. and C. J. Jenkins, 15–39. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. 2019. Mapping Computational Social Science. https://www.chrisbail.net/post/mapping-computational-social-science
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and R. H. Cox, Eds. 2010. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belt, D. D. 2006. “Global Islamism—Understanding and Strategy.” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 5 (4): 41–63. doi:10.11610/Connections.05.4.03.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ephraim, S. 2016. June. “In Blood and Fire: Strategic Subcultures and the Roots of Israeli Strategic Culture.” In Proceedings of the A Western or Eastern Nation? The Case of Israel – the 32nd Annual Conference of the Association of Israel Studies. Jerusalem, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and A. Herzog. 2016. “Text Analysis: Estimating Policy Preferences from Written and Spoken Words.” In Analytics, Policy and Governance, edited by Bachner, J., K. W. Hill, and B. Ginsberg. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, T. U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsmann, S. 2001. “The Concept of Military Alliance.” In Small States and Alliances, edited by Reiter, E. and H. Gärtner, 25–37. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A. 2012. “Time to Move On: Reconceptualizing the Strategic Culture Debate.” Contemporary Security Policy 33 (3): 437–461. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.727679.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A., and K. R. Nossal. 2007. “Towards an Explicative Understanding of Strategic Culture: The Cases of Australia and Canada.” Contemporary Security Policy 28 (2): 286–307. doi:10.1080/13523260701489859.
   Google Scholar
• Börner, K., A. Nimhan, R. Light, V. Pentchev, and M. Hutchinson. 2016. IUNI Web of Science Data Enclave 101. Bloomington, Indiana: Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. P. 2017. “The Contemporary Presidency: The Trump Transition, Early Presidency, and National Security Organization.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 574–596. doi:10.1111/psq.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A., and B. Eltham. 2014. “Australia’s Strategic Culture: Constraints and Opportunities in Security Policymaking.” Contemporary Security Policy 35 (2): 187–210. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.927672.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., and L. Hansen. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., and R. D. Kelemen. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59 (3): 341–369. doi:10.1017/S0043887100020852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. J., M. E. H. Willis, J. S. Barnes, N. Caddick, J. Cromby, H. McDermott, and G. Wiltshire. 2015. “Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-study.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (2): 182–201. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.948980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desch, M. C. 1998. “Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies.” International Security 23 (1): 141–170. doi:10.1162/isec.23.1.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeser, F. 2017. “Strategic Culture, Domestic Politics, and Foreign Policy: Finland’s Decision to Refrain from Operation Unified Protector.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3): 741–759. doi:10.1093/fpa/orx001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghez, J. J. 2011. Alliances in the 21st Century: Implications for the US-European Partnership. RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W. 2017. Web of Science as Data Research Set: The Experience at ECOOM – KU Leuven. https://figshare.com/articles/Web_of_Science_as_Research_Data_Set/5107102
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, J. 2009. “Realism versus Strategic Culture: Competition and Collaboration?” International Studies Review 11 (3): 523–551. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00872.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. S. 1999. “Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back.” Review of International Studies 25 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1017/S0260210599000492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. S. 2004. The Navy in the Post-Cold War World: The Uses and Value of Strategic Sea Power. University Park: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. S. 2006. Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Greathouse, C. B. 2010. “Examining the Role and Methodology of Strategic Culture.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1 (1): 57–85. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1020.
   Google Scholar
• Haar, R. 2010. “Explaining George W. Bush’s Adoption of the Neoconservative Agenda after 9/11.” Politics & Policy 38 (5): 965–990. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00265.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E. M., M. Kahler, and A. H. Montgomery. 2009. “Network Analysis for International Relations.” International Organization 63 (3): 559–592. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, D. G. 2014. “What Can Strategic Culture Contribute to Our Understanding of Security Policies in the Asia-Pacific Region?” Contemporary Security Policy 35 (2): 310–328. doi:10.1080/13523260.2014.927674.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and R. C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikka, H. 2005. “Republican Realism: Finnish Strategic Culture in Historical Perspective.” Cooperation and Conflict 40 (1): 91–119. doi:10.1177/0010836705049736.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M. 2006. “Historical-institutionalism in Political Science and the Problem of Change.” In Understanding Change: Methods, Methodologies and Metaphors, edited by Wimmer, A. and R. Kössler, 237–259. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. 2019. “Poststructuralist Discourse Theory as an Independent Paradigm for Studying Institutions: Towards a New Definition of ‘Discursive Construction’in Institutional Analysis.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (3): 379–401. doi:10.1057/s41296-018-0279-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. 1995. “Thinking about Strategic Culture.” International Security 19 (4): 32–64. doi:10.2307/2539119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. I. 1999. “Strategic Cultures Revisited: Reply to Colin Gray.” Review of International Studies 25 (3): 519–523. doi:10.1017/S0260210599005197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. 1996. “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, R. R., and J. K. Lobasz. 2007. “Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq.” Security Studies 16 (3): 409–451. doi:10.1080/09636410701547881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. 2018. “Small States and EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Case of Luxembourg. [Blog].” Oliver Lewis. http://www.olivierlewis.com/blog/small-states-and-the-eus-common-foreign-and-security-policy-the-case-of-luxembourg#
   Google Scholar
• Libel, T. 2016a. European military culture and security governance: Soldiers, scholars and national defence universities. London, U.K.: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Libel, T. 2016b. Explaining the security paradigm shift: strategic culture, epistemic communities, and Israel’s changing national security policy. Defence Studies, 16(2), 137–156 doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1165595
   Google Scholar
• Libel, T. 2020. Rethinking strategic culture: A computational (social science) discursive-institutionalist approach. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(5), 686–709 doi:10.1080/01402390.2018.1545645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libel, T., & Hubl, V. 2017. Tracing strategic culture: A computational approach. Proceedings of the 11th Pan-European Conference on International Relations. Barcelona, Spain
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. M. 2009. “Does Al Qaeda Have a Strategic Culture?” In Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction, 201–218. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, K. 2018. Germany and the Use of Force. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C., R. A. Nielsen, M. E. Roberts, B. M. Stewart, A. Storer, and D. Tingley. 2015. “Computer-assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 23 (2): 254–277. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. P. 2017. “Mars and Minerva: The God of War and the Goddess of Wisdom and Reform of Professional Military Education.” United Service 68 (2): 9.
   Google Scholar
• Matlary, J. H. 2006. “When Soft Power Turns Hard: Is an EU Strategic Culture Possible?” Security Dialogue 37 (1): 105–121. doi:10.1177/0967010606064140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Security 15 (1): 5–56. doi:10.2307/2538981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirow, W. 2016. Strategic Culture, Securitisation and the Use of Force: Post-9/11 Security Practices of Liberal Democracies. London, U.K: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moyar, M. 2007. “The Current State of Military History.” The Historical Journal 50 (1): 225–240. doi:10.1017/S0018246X0600598X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norheim-Martinsen, P. M. 2011. “EU Strategic Culture: When the Means Becomes the End.” Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 517–534. doi:10.1080/13523260.2011.623055.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, F., and R. Miorelli. 2013. “Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory.” Political Studies 61 (2): 301–318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perre, N. 2018. “Dutch Strategic Culture – A Case Study.” MSc thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Poore, S. 2003. “What Is the Context? A Reply to the Gray-Johnston Debate on Strategic Culture.” Review of International Studies 29 (2): 279–284. doi:10.1017/S0260210503002791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riche, N. H., C. Hurter, N. Diakopoulos, and S. Carpendale, Eds. 2018. Data-driven Storytelling. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, R. M., T. A. B. Snijders, Z. Boda, A. Vörös, and P. Preciado. 2019. Manual for SIENA Version 4.0 (Version April 9, 2019). Oxford: University of Oxford. Retrieved from: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/snijders/siena
   Google Scholar
• Rivalle, G. n.d. Web of Science as a Dataset, Breath and Depth.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., B. M. Stewart, and D. Tingley. 2014. “Stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 10 (2): 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, R. H. 2012. “Strategic Culture and Strategic Studies: An Alternative Framework for Assessing al-Qaeda and the Global Jihad Movement.” (No. JSOU-12-4). Joint Special Operations.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, B. 2016. “Network Structure and Social Outcome.” In Computational Social Science, edited by Alvaretz, R. M., 3226–3686. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kindle edition.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. 1977. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Nuclear Options. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. 2008. “What Is Historical Institutionalism?” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by Della Porta, D. and M. Keating, 150–178. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Esch, F. 2015. “Measuring the Ideational Turn in Political Science Introducing Cognitive Mapping as a Method for the Study of Ideas.” In Proceedings of the ECPR General Conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, O. 2015. “The History and Social Structure of Security Studies as a Practico-academic Field.” In Security Expertise: Practice, Power, Responsibility, edited by Berling, T. V. and C. Bueger, 76–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, H. 2016. “Computational Social Science: Toward a Collaborative Future.” In Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction, Kindle edn. edited by Alvarez, R. M., 7867–8083. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 1991. “The Renaissance of Security Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 211–239. doi:10.2307/2600471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., M. Visser, and N. Jan van Eck. 2018. Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, and Beyond: The Evolving Landscape of Bibliometric Data Resources.
   Google Scholar