A conceptual critique of remote warfare

References

• Adamy, David L. 2015. Electronic Warfare against a New Generation of Threats. London: Artech House.
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, Rebecca A., and David Kieran. 2020. “Introduction: Rethinking Killing at a Distance.” In Remote Warfare: New Cultures of Violence, edited by Adelman, Rebecca A., and David Kieran. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 1–28 .
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith. 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Almäng, Jan. 2019. “War, Vagueness and Hybrid War.” Defence Studies 19 (2): 189–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1597631
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, Claudia. 2012. “Security, War, Violence – The Politics of Critique: A Reply to Barkawi.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 41 (1): 112–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjona, Ana. 2014. “Wartime Institutions: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (8): 1360–1389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714547904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, David. 2017. Civil Wars. A History in Ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arquilla, John. 2021. Bitskrieg. The New Challenge of Cyberwarfare. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Toft, Ivan. 2006. “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict.” International Security 26 (1): 93–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/016228801753212868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Toft, Ivan. 2012. “Contemporary Asymmetric Conflict Theory in Historical Perspective.” Terrorism and Political Violence 24 (4): 635–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2012.700624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells, Laia, and Stathis N. Kalyvas. 2014. “Does Warfare Matter? Severity, Duration, and Outcomes of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (8): 1390–1418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714547903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak. 2004. “On the Pedagogy of ‘Small Wars.” International Affairs 80 (1): 19–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00363.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak. 2011. “From War to Security: Security Studies, the Wider Agenda and the Fate of the Study of War.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3): 701–716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811400656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak. 2016. “Decolonizing War.” European Journal of International Security 1 (2): 199–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2016.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, Tarak, and Shane Brighton. 2011. “Powers of War: Fighting, Knowledge, and Critique.” International Political Sociology 5 (2): 126–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barno, David. 2014. “The Shadow Wars of the 21st Century.” War on the Rocks, July 23. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/the-shadow-wars-of-the-21st-century/
   Google Scholar
• Beehner, Lionel. 2015. “How Proxy Wars Work.” Foreign Affairs, November 12. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-11-12/how-proxy-wars-work
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, Rocco, Kristina Irion, Katja Lindskov Jacobsen, Francesco Ragazzi, Rune Saugmann, and Lucy Suchman. 2021. “Towards a Critique of Algorithmic Violence.” International Political Sociology 15 (1): 121–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, Felix. 2017. “Approaches to Concept Analysis.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45 (2): 151–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816651934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, Felix. 2016. “Unpacking Concepts.” In Concepts in World Politics, edited by Berenskoetter, Felix. 1-19. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, Mark, and Asaf Kedar. 2008. “Concept Formation in Political Science: An Anti-Naturalist Critique of Qualitative Methodology.” Perspectives on Politics 6 (3): 503–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592708081255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biberman, Yelena. 2021. “The Technologies and International Politics of Genetic Warfare.” Strategic Studies Quarterly Fall, 6–33.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Stephen. 2021. Nonstate Warfare: The Military Methods of Guerrillas, Warlords, and Militias. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biegon, Rubrick, et al. 2021. “Remote Warfare: Buzzword or Buzzkill?.” Defence Studies. Online First. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1994396
   Google Scholar
• Biegon, Rubrick, and Thomas F. A. Watts. 2020. “Remote Warfare and the Retooling of American Primacy.” Geopolitics Online First. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1850442
   Google Scholar
• Bilms, Kevin. 2021. “What’s in a Name? Reimagining Irregular Warfare Activities for Competition.” War on the Rocks, January 15. Accessed on 16 Jun 2021. https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/whats-in-a-name-reimagining-irregular-warfare-activities-for-competition/
   Google Scholar
• Borghard, Erica, and Shawn W. Lonergan. 2021. “Deterrence by Denial in Cyberspace.” Journal of Strategic Studies Online First 1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1944856.
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet, Antoine. 2020a. “Researching ‘Digital War’: Terminological Snares, Conceptual Pitfalls, and Methodological Hazards.” Digital War 1 (1–3): 159–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00018-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet, Antoine, Jairus Grove, and Nisha Shah. 2020b. “Becoming War: Towards a Martial Empiricism.” Security Dialogue 51 (2–3): 99–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619895660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, Bleddyn E. 2020. War in Space: Strategy, Spacepower, Geopolitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Michael J., and Anthony F. Lang Jr. 2021. “Remaking the World in America’s Image: Surprise, Strategic Culture, and the American Ways of Intervention.” Foreign Policy Analysis 17 (2): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Michael J. 2012. “Progress and Pitfalls in the Study of Political Violence.” Terrorism and Political Violence 24 (4): 527–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2012.700608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Michael J. 2021. The Drone Age: How Drone Technology Will Change War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, Jordan. 2021. “What’s in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity.” International Organization 75 (1): 39–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000051X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Rosa. 2017. How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bufacchi, Vittorio. 2005. “Two Concepts of Violence.” Political Studies Review 3 (2): 193–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00023.x.
   Google Scholar
• Canestaro, Nathan. 2016. “Towards a Practitioner-Centric Definition of Civil War.” Civil Wars 18 (3): 359–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2016.1215635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, Susan L. 2001. “New Media New War.” International Affairs 77 (3): 673–681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrowski, Arthur. K, and John H. Garstka. 1998. Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future. Proceedings, US Naval Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Chapa, Joseph. 2021. “Human Judgement in Remote Warfare.” In Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Mckay, Alasdair,Watson, Abigail and Karlshøj-Pedersen, Megan. 199-217. Bristol: E-IR Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher. 2015. Future War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of War.” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 2 (1): 55–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.26.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, Tara. 2021. “‘It Failed Miserably’: After War Gaming Loss, Joint Chiefs are Overhauling How the US Military Will Fight.” Defense One, July 26. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2021/07/it-failed-miserably-after-wargaming-loss-joint-chiefs-are-overhauling-how-us-military-will-fight/184050/
   Google Scholar
• Cragin, Kim R. 2015. “Semi-Proxy Wars and US Counterterrorism Strategy.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 38 (5): 311–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1018024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragin, Kim. R. 2020. “Tactical Partnerships for Strategic Effects: Recent Experiences of US Forces Working By, With, and through Surrogates in Syria and Libya.” Defence Studies 20 (4): 318–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1807338.
   Google Scholar
• Deibert, Ronald J. 1997. “Excorcismus Theoriae. Pragmatism, Metaphors and the Return of the Medieval in IR Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (2): 167–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmers, Jolle, and Lauren Gould. 2018. “An Assemblage Approach to Liquid Warfare: AFRICOM and the ‘Hunt’ for Joseph Kony.” Security Dialogue 49 (5): 364–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618777890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, Paul F. 2002. “Chasing Headlines: Setting the Research Agenda on War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19 (1): 5–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/073889420201900103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor, Austin C., and James I. Walsh. 2021. “The Coercive Logic of Militant Drone Use.” Parameters 51 (2): 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. 2011. “Advancing a Reflexive International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3): 805–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811402709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1977. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Economist, The. 2021. “The French Armed Forces are Planning for High-Intensity War”, April 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, Hans-Georg. 2017. “Postmodern Warfare and the Blurred Boundaries between War and Peace.” Defense and Security Analysis 33 (3): 263–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1351156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre, Cécile. 2012. Cosmopolitan War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter D. 1998. “Blowback: Information Warfare and the Dynamics of Coercion.” Security Studies 7 (4): 88–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419808429359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, Geoffrey. 2000. Linguistic Terms and Concepts. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, John Rupert. 1957. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis.” In Special Volume of the Philological Society, 1–32. Oxford: Philological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Fishel, John T., and Max G. Manwarin. 2006. Uncomfortable Wars Revisited. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florea, Adrian. 2012. “Where Do We Go from Here? Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological Gaps in the Large-N Civil War Research Program.” International Studies Review 14 (1): 78–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Amos C. 2019. “In Pursuit of a General Theory of Proxy Warfare.” Land Warfare Paper, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Amos C. 2020. “Five Models of Strategic Relationship in Proxy War.” Georgetown Security Studies Review 8 (2): 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence. 2014. “Ukraine and the Art of Limited War.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 56 (6): 7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, Ofer, Kabernik, Vitaly, and C. Pearce, James. 2019. Hybrid Conflicts and Information Warfare: New Labels, Old Politics. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Futter, Andrew. 2018. “‘Cyber’ Semantics: Why We Should Retire the Latest Buzzword in Security Studies.” Journal of Cyber Policy 3 (2): 201–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1514417.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, Mark. 2016. “Hybrid, Ambiguous, and Non-Linear? How New Is Russia’s ‘New Way of War’?” Small Wars and Insurgencies 27 (2): 282–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2015.1129170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. B. 1955. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Erik. 2013. “The Myth of Cyberwar: Bring War in Cyberspace Back.” International Security 38 (2): 41–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, Robert M. 2009. “A Balanced Strategy. Reprogramming the Pentagon for A New Age.” Foreign Affairs 88 (1): 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, Tracey. 2019. “Introduction: Re-visioning War and the State in the Twenty-First Century.” International Affairs 95 (4): 759–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 1999. “What Makes A Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Polity 31 (3): 357–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilli, Andrea, and Mauro Gilli. 2016. “The Diffusion of Drone Warfare? Industrial, Organisation, and Infrastructural Constraints.” Security Studies 25 (1): 50–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2016.1134189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Cliff. 1999. Semantic Analysis. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golovchenko, Yevgeniy, Hartmann, Mareike, and Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2018. “State, Media and Civil Society in the Information Warfare over Ukraine: Citizen Curators of Digital Disinformation.” International Affairs 94 (5): 975–994. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhand, Jonathan, and David Hulme. 1999. “From Wars to Complex Political Emergencies: Understanding Conflict and Peace-Building in the New World Disorder.” Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 13–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graae, Andreas Immanuel, and Kathrin Maure. 2021. Drone Imaginaries. The Power of Remote Vision. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin. 2005. How Has War Changed since the End of the Cold War?. Parameters. (Spring), 14-26.
   Google Scholar
• Groh, Tyrone. 2019. Proxy War: The Least Bad Option. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunitsky, Seva. 2013. “Complexity and Theories of Change in International Politics.” International Theory 5 (1): 35–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971913000110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, Stefano. 2005. “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 495–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammes, Thomas X. 2005. “War Evolves into the Fourth Generation.” Contemporary Security Policy 26 (2): 189–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260500190500.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard J., and Max Smeets. 2020. Cyber Campaigns and Strategic Outcomes. Journal of Strategic Studies. Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard J. 1996. “Information Warfare and Deterrence.” Parameters. (Autumn), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, Jason. 2020. “Composite Warfare and Civil War Outcome.” Terrorism and Political Violence 32 (6): 1268–1290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1464444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, Lee. 2020. “Information Warfare, Accelerated Warfare and the Human Endeavour.” Australian Army Journal 16 (1): 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Maria, and Charlotte Wagnsson. 2017. “How Can European States Respond to Russian Information Warfare? an Analytical Framework.” European Security 26 (2): 153–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1294162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, Yee Kuang. 2010. “Ghosts in the Machine: Is IR Eternally Haunted by the Spectre of Old Concepts?” International Politics 47 (5): 535–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser, Beatrice. 2010. “Small Wars in the Age of Clausewitz: The Watershed between Partisan War and People’s War.” Journal of Strategic Studies 33 (1): 139–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402391003603623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank G. 2014. “On Not-So-New Warfare: Political Warfare Vs Hybrid Threats.” War on the Rocks, July 28. Accessed 12 Aug 2021. https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/on-not-so-new-warfare-political-warfare-vs-hybrid-threats/
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank G. 2009. “Hybrid Warfare and Challenges.” Joint Forces Quarterly 52 (1): 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Frank G. 2016. The Contemporary Spectrum of Conflict: Protracted, Gray Zone, Ambiguous, and Hybrid Modes of War. Heritage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Thomas M. 2002. Compound Warfare. That Fatal Knot. Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College Press Fort Leavenworth.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, Adam R. C. 2011. “The Heuristic Application of Explanatory Theories in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 257–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109344008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentzsch, Corinna, N. Kalyvas, Stathis, and Schubiger, Livia Isabella. 2015. “Militias in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (5): 755–769. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715576753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, James. 2003. “Conceptual Problems as Obstacles to Progress in Political Science: Four Decades of Political Culture Research.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 87–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, Oscar. 2019. “Russian Information Warfare and Its Challenges to International Law.” In Routledge Handbook of War, Law and Technology, edited by Gow, James, Dijxhoorn, Ernst, and Guglielmo Verdirame, Rachel Kerr. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Junio, Timothy J. 2009. “Military History and Fourth Generation Warfare.” Journal of Strategic Studies 32 (2): 243–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390902743266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2003. “The Ontology of Political Violence: Action and Identity in Civil Wars.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 475–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000355.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2015. “Is ISIS a Revolutionary Group and if Yes, What are the Implications?” Perspectives on Terrorism 9 (4): 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2009. “Civil Wars.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Boix, Carles and Susan C. Stokes. 416-433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2019. “The Landscape of Political Violence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism, edited by Chenoweth, Erica, English, Richad, Gofas, Andreas, and N. Kalyuvas, Stathis. 11-33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2005. “Warfare in Civil Wars.” In Rethinking the Nature of War, edited by Duyvesteyn, Isabelle and Angström Jan. 88-108. London and New York: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, Emmanuel. 2021. “Russian Surrogate Warfare in Ukraine and Syria: Understanding the Utility of Militias and Private Military Companies.” Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 23 (4): 549–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.1888603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal, Siddarth. 2018. “Positional Warfare. A Paradigm for Understanding Twenty-First-Century Conflict.” The RUSI Journal 163 (2): 34–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2018.1470395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibrik, Roee. 2021. “The State of Concept: A New Analytical Tool for Political Research.” International Relations. Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, David. 2020. The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learned to Fight the West. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• King, Anthony. 2021. Urban Warfare in the Twenty-First Century. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Klosek, Kamil, Bahenský, Vojtěch, Smetana, Micha, and Ludvík, Jan. 2021. “Frozen Conflicts in World Politics: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 58 (4): 849–858. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320929726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, Emily, and Abigail Watson. 2018a. Remote Warfare: Lessons Learned from Contemporary Theatres. London: Oxford Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, Emily, and Abigail Watson. 2018b. ‘Lawful but Awful?’ Legal and Political Challenges of Remote Warfare and Working with Partners. London: Oxford Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, Andreas, and Jean-Mark Rickli. 2018. “Surrogate Warfare: The Art of War in the 21st Century?” Defence Studies 18 (2): 113–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1429218.
   Google Scholar
• Kriel, Charles. 2017. “Fake News, Fake Wars, Fake Worlds.” Defence Strategic Communications 3 (3): 171–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.30966/2018.riga.3.6.
   Google Scholar
• Laitin, David D. 1995. “Review: Disciplining Political Science. Reviewed Work: Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research by Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, Sidney Verba.” The American Political Science Review 89 (2): 454–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400096453.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Melissa. 2020. Crippling Leviathan. How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Paul. 2020. “Micro-cyberwar Vs. Macro-cyberwar: Towards the Beginning of a Taxonomy.” Digital War 1 (1–3): 171–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00020-z.
   Google Scholar
• Levite, Ariel E., and Jonathan (Yoni) Shimshoni. 2018. “The Strategic Challenge of Society-centric Warfare.” Survival 60 (6): 91–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1542806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin. C. 1995. What Is Information Warfare? Washington: National Defence University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, Martin. 2012. Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace. California: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, Anatol. 2018. “The Dance of the Ghosts: A New Cold War with Russia Will Not Serve Western Interests.” Survival 60 (5): 115–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1518372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Michael. 2018. “Welcome to Cold War II.” The National Interest (May-June), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, William S. 1989. “The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation.” Marine Corps Gazette, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lupion, Miranda. 2018. “The Gray War of Our Time: Information Warfare and the Kremlin’s Weaponization of Russian-Language Digital News.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 31 (3): 329–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2018.1487208.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, Margaret. 2021. War. How Conflict Shaped Us. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, Stew. 2018. “DARPA Pushes ‘Mosaic Warfare’ Concept.” National Defense, November 16. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2018/11/16/darpa-pushes-mosaic-warfare-concept
   Google Scholar
• Malešević, Siniša. 2017. “The Organisation of Military Violence in the 21st Century.” Organization 24 (4): 456–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417693854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Zachariah, and Megan A. Stewart. 2021. “A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 65 (1): 15–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720935642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas A., and Paul B. Rich. 2017. “Back to the Future – People’s War in the 21st Century.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 28 (3): 409–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2017.1307620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Thomas. A., and Kirklin J. Bateman. 2019. “Perspectives on the American Way of War: The US Experience in Irregular Conflict.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 30 (1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2018.1552438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Robert W. T. 1997. “Context and Contraction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual Change.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (2): 413–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Linn, Brian. 2011. “The U.S. Armed Forces’ View of War.” Daedalus 140 (3): 33–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Jack. 2021. “Remote Warfare and the Legitimacy of Military Capabilities.” Defence Studies Online First.
   Google Scholar
• McInnes, Colin. 2002. Spectator-Sport War. The West and Contemporary Conflict. London: Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, Alasdair. MCKAY, ALASDAIR, WATSON, ABIGAIL, AND KARLSHØJ-PEDERSEN,MEGAN. 2021. Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Bristol: E-IR Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merrin, William. 2018. Digital War. A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merrin, William. 2020. “Anthropocenic War: Coronavirus and Total Demobilization.” Digital War 1 (1–3): 36–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00016-9.
   Google Scholar
• Merrin, William, and Andrew Hoskins. 2020. “Tweet Fast and Kill Things: Digital War.” Digital War 1 (1–3): 184–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00002-1.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, Assaf, and Michel Wyss. 2018. “Five Myths about Sponsor-Proxy Relationships.” Lawfare, December 16. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://www.lawfareblog.com/five-myths-about-sponsor-proxy-relationships
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, Assad, and Michel Wyss. 2020. “The Political Power of Proxies: Why Nonstate Actors Use Local Surrogates.” International Security 44 (4): 119–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Andrew, and McDonald Jack. 2014. “Ambiguous Warfare”. Report produced for the Development, Concepts, and Doctrine Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Niva, Steve. 2013. “Disappearing Violence: JSOC and the Pentagon’s New Cartography of Networked Warfare.” Security Dialogue 44 (3): 185–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, Ben. 2020. “Towards a Third Image of War: Post-Digital War.” Digital War 1 (1): 123–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00015-w.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, Jens David. 2017a. “Introduction.” In Research Handbook on Remote Warfare, edited by Ohlin, Jens David. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, Jens David. 2017b. “Remoteness and Reciprocal Risk.” In Research Handbook on Remote Warfare, edited by Ohlin, Jens David. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ophir, Adi. 2018. “Concept.” In Political Concepts. A Critical Lexicon, edited by Bernstein, J. M., Ophir, Adi, and Stoler, Ann Laura. New York: Fordham University Press. 59-86
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, Felix, E. 1975. “The Language of Political Inquiry: Problems of Clarification.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by Greenstein, Fred. I.: and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, Kris. 2021. “Future of War Will Be ‘Hyperactive Battlefields’: US Army General.” The National Interest, January 31.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, Hulme, M., and Erick Gartzke. 2021. “The Tyranny of Distance: Assessing and Explaining the Apparent Decline in U.S. Military Performance.” International Studies Quarterly 65 (2): 542–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, David, G. 2017. “Multi-Domain Battle. Driving Change to Win in the Future.” Military Review July-August. 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• PETIT, BRIAN, FERENZI, STEVE, AND BILMS, KEVIN. 2021. “An Irregular Upgrade to Operational Design.” War on the Rocks, March 19. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://warontherocks.com/2021/03/an-irregular-upgrade-to-operational-design/
   Google Scholar
• Polyakova, Alina. 2019. “Are US and Russia in a New Cold War?” Brookings, January 20. Accessed on 15 Aug 2021. https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/are-u-s-and-russia-in-a-new-cold-war/
   Google Scholar
• Qiao, Liang, and Xiangsui Wang. 1999. Unrestricted Warfare. People’s Liberation Army Literature and Arts Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2016. “Proxy Agents, Auxiliary Forces and Sovereign Defection: Assessing the Outcomes of Using Non-State Actors in Civil Conflicts.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (1): 91–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1148416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2018. “A Structural-Relational Analysis of Party Dynamics in Proxy Wars.” International Relations 32 (4): 449–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818802436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir , Ayton, Matthew, Chinchilla, Alexandra , Krieg, Andreas, Rickard, Christopher & Rickli, Jean-Marc. 2019. “A Symposium – Debating ‘Surrogate Warfare’ and the Transformation of War.” Defence Studies 19 (4): 410–430. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1680290.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2020a. “Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict: Take Two.” The RUSI Journal 165 (2): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2020.1736437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2020b. “Towards a Typology of Non-State Actors in ‘Hybrid Warfare’: Proxy, Auxiliary, Surrogate and Affiliated Forces.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (6): 868–887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1656600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2021a. “‘Proxy War’ - A Reconceptualisation.” Civil Wars 23 (1): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2021.1860578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir. 2021b. “Framers, Founders, and Reformers: Three Generations of Proxy War Research.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (1): 113–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1800240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, Vladimir, and Sean Monaghan. 2021. Global Britain in the Grey Zone: Between Statecraft and Stagecraft. Contemporary Security Policy. Online First. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1980984
   Google Scholar
• Rees, Morgan Thomas. 2021. “Obama and the Use of Force: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of Libya and Syria.” International Relations. Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Renz, Bettina. 2016. “Russia and ‘Hybrid Warfare.’” Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 283–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rid, Thomas. 2012. “Cyber War Will Not Take Place.” Journal of Strategic Studies 35 (1): 5–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.608939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemann, Malte. 2021. “‘As Old as War Itself?’ Historicizing the Universal Mercenary.” Journal of Global Security Studies 6 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemann, Malte, and Norma Rossi. 2021a. “Remote Warfare as ‘Security of Being’: Reading Security Force Assistance as an Ontological Security Routine.” Defence Studies Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Riemann, Malte, and Norma Rossi. 2021b. “Outsourcing Death, Sacrifice and Remembrance: The Socio-Political Effects of Remote Warfare.” In Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by ALASDAIR MCKAY, ABIGAIL WATSON AND MEGAN KARLSHØJ-PEDERSEN. 79-95. Bristol: E-IR Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Linda. Todd C. Helmus, Raphael S. Cohen, Alireza Nader, Andrew Radin, Madeline Magnuson, and Katya Migacheva. 2018. Modern Political Warfare. Current Practices and Possible Responses. California: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Roff, Heather, M. 2014. “The Strategic Robot Problem: Lethal Autonomous Weapons in War.” Journal of Military Ethics 13 (3): 211–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2014.975010.
   Google Scholar
• Rondeaux, Candance, and David Sterman. 2019. “Twenty-First Century Proxy Warfare: Confronting Strategic Innovation in a Multipolar World.” New America.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, James, N. 1980. “Thinking Theory Thoroughly.” In The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, edited by Roseanu, James N. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rotaru, Vasile. 2019. “Instrumentalising the Recent Past? the New Cold War Narrative in Russian Public Space after 2014.”.” Post-Soviet Affairs 35 (1): 25–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1511336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, David. 2013. “The Cool War.” Foreign Policy, February 20. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/20/the-cool-war/
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Maria. 2019. Full Spectrum Dominance: Irregular Warfare and the War on Terror. Standard: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, David, E. 2018. The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage, and Fear in the Cyber Age. London: Scribe UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 2009a. “Guidelines for Concept Analysis.” In Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, edited by Collier, David and John Gerring. 97-150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. 2009b. “Comparing and Miscomparing.” In Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, edited by Collier, David and John Gerring. 151-164. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul. 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. London: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas. 2010. “Concept Formation in Political Science.” CIDE No, 219.
   Google Scholar
• Scheipers, Sibylle. 2014. “Counterinsurgency or Irregular Warfare? Historiography and the Study of ‘Small Wars.’” Small Wars and Insurgencies 25 (5–6): 879–899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2014.945281.
   Google Scholar
• Scheipers, Sibylle. 2015. Unlawful Combatants: A Genealogy of the Irregular Fighter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheipers, Sibylle. 2017. “Irregular Auxiliaries after 1945.” The International History Review 39 (1): 14–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2016.1179206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Eric, and Jared Cohen. 2013. The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Schulzke, Marcus. 2016. “The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry.” Political Studies 64 (1): 90–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, Ian G. R. 2017. “Robot Wars: US Empire and Geopolitics in the Robotic Age.” Security Dialogue 48 (5): 451–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617713157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Paul W., and Emerson T. Brooking. 2018. LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media. Boston: Eamon Dolan Book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Paul. W. 2009. Wired for War. The Robotic Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. R. 2005. “Strategy in an Age of ‘Low-intensity’ Warfare: Why Clausewitz Is Still More Relevant than His Critics.” In Rethinking the Nature of War, edited by Duyvesteyn, Isabelle and Angström Jan. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, Margaret. 1995. “What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Towards an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation.” Sociological Theory 13 (2): 113–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/202157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, Jeffrey, A. 2020. “The Era of Full-Spectrum War Is Here.” Foreign Policy, October 23. Accessed on 12 Aug 2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/23/full-spectrum-war-china-united-states-russia/
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul. 2017. “Armed Politics and the Study of Intrastate Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 54 (4): 459–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317698848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, Jessica, A. 2019. “Terrorism, Civil War, and Insurgency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism, edited by Chenoweth, Erica, et al. 348-365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, Edward, and Sorina Toltica. 2021. “Practising Remote Warfare: Analysing the Remote Character of the Saudi/UAE Intervention in Yemen.” Defence Studies Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, Donald, and Craig Whiteside. 2020. “Blurred Lines. Gray-zone Conflict and Hybrid War – Two Failures of American Strategic Thinking.” Naval War College Review 73 (1): 12–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, Hew. 2020. “Clouds of War and Strategic Delusions.” Standpoint. February 26.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, Robert. 2002. War of the Flea: The Classic Study of Guerrilla Warfare. Washington: Potomac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, Bradley, A. 2000. “The Political Effects of Information Warfare: Why New Military Capabilities Cause Old Political Dangers.” Security Studies 10 (1): 43–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410008429420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theussen, Amelie. 2021. International Law Is Dead, Long Live International Law: The State Practice of Drone Strikes. International Politics. Online First.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00333-0
   Google Scholar
• Trenta, Luca. 2021. ‘Remote Killing? Remoteness, Covertness, and the US Government’s Involvement in Assassination’, Defence Studies, Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, David H., and Thomas A. Marks. 2018. “Violence in Context: Mapping the Strategies and Operational Art of Irregular Warfare.” Contemporary Security Policy 39 (2): 206–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1432922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votel, Joseph L. Charles T. Cleveland, Charles T. Connett, and Will Irwin. 2016. “Unconventional Warfare in the Gray Zone.” Joint Forces Quarterly 80 (1): 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, Thomas. 2018. “Vicarious Warfare: The Counterproductive Consequences of Modern American Military Practice.” Contemporary Security Policy 39 (2): 181–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1393201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, Thomas. 2021. Vicarious Warfare: American Strategy and the Illusion of War on the Cheap. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, Mark. 2004. Mean Girls. Paramount Pictures, M. G. Films, Broadway Video.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Abigail, and Alasdair Mckay. 2021. “Remote Warfare: A Critical Introduction.” In Remote Warfare Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by ALASDAIR MCKAY, ABIGAIL WATSON AND MEGAN KARLSHØJ-PEDERSEN. 7-33. Bristol: E-IR Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Thomas, F. A, and Rubrick Biegon. 2021. Revisiting the Remoteness of Remote Warfare: US Military Intervention in Libya during Obama’s Presidency. Defence Studies Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, Craig. 2016. “New Masters of Revolutionary Warfare: The Islamic State Movement (2002-2016).” Perspectives on Terrorism 10 (4): 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkens, Jan, and Oliver Kessler. 2021. “Concluding Chapter: Concepts at Work in Global IR.” In Concepts at Work: On the Linguistic Infrastructure of World Politics, edited by Ish-Shalom, Piki. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zinnes, Dina A. 1980. “Three Puzzles in Search of a Researcher: Presidential Address.” International Studies Quarterly 24 (3): 315–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar