Transatlantic cooperation in flux: Europe’s small and cautious steps towards “strategic autonomy”

References

• Alcaro, R. 2019. “Europe’s Struggle in the Fraying Transatlantic Order.” Survival. Global Politics and Strategy 61 (6): 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Alcaro, R., and A. Dessi. 2019. A Last Line of Defense: A Strategy for Europe to Preserve the Iran Nuclear Deal. Rome: Instituto Affari Internazionali.
   Google Scholar
• Alden, C., and A. Aran. 2017. Foreign Policy Analysis. New Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archick, K., and D.E. Mix 2015. “US-EU Cooperation on Ukraine and Russia.” Current Politics and Economics of Europe 29 (4): 437–440.
   Google Scholar
• Baciu, C. 2022. “Interpolarity. Re-visiting security and the global order.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110482.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, J. 2019. “US NATO Policy in the Age Of Trump: Controversy and Consistency.” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 43 (1): 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Besch, S., and L. Scazzieri. 2020. European Strategic Autonomy and a New Transatlantic Bargain. Brussels: Center for European Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M. 2019. “NATO Countries Boost Defense Spending Ahead of Summit Showdown with Trump”. Washington Post, November 29.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. 2022. “Strategic Autonomy: Not without Integration”, Policy Brief. January. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Casarini, N. 2020. “Rising to the Challenge: Europe’s Security Policy in East Asia and the US-China Rivalry.” The International Spectator 55 (1): 78–92. doi:10.1080/03932729.2020.1712133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. 2020. “NATO, Europe, US & China”. spokesmanbooks.com, 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, K. S. L. 2019. “China-India Rivalry at Sea: Capability, Trends and Challenges.” Asia Security 15 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1080/14799855.2019.1539820.
   Google Scholar
• Cottey, A. 2019. “Europe and China’s Sea Disputes: Between Normative Politics, Power Balancing and Acquiescence.” European Security 28 (4): 473–492. doi:10.1080/09662839.2019.1636784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Sarto, R. A. 2019. “Stuck in the Logic of Oslo: Europe and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” The Middle East Journal 73 (3): 376–396. doi:10.3751/73.3.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delphine Deschaux-Dutard. 2022. “EU’s Global Strategy in an Interpolar Multipolar Context: Explaining the Limitations of French-German Contribution to European Strategic Autonomy.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 591–608.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung, K. 2021. “In Allied Capitals, a Nuanced, Cautious View of Biden”. The Washington Post, October 17.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S. 2017. Europe as a Stronger Global Actor. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban, M., M. Otero-Iglesias, U. Berzina-Cerenkova, A. Ekman, L. Poggetti, B. Jerdén, J. Seaman & J. Szczudlik, edited by. 2020. Europe in the Face of US-China Rivalry. Madrid: A report by the European Think-tank Network on China.
   Google Scholar
• EUGS. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. Brussels: European Union. External Action. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Garey, J. 2020. The US Role in NATO’s Survival after the Cold War. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Götz, E., and C.-R. Merlen. 2019. “Russia and the Question of World Order.” European Politics and Society 20 (2): 133–153. doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1545181.
   Google Scholar
• Gresh, G. 2020. “The New Great Game at Sea.” Texas National Security Review, December 8.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S. 2020. “Preventing Crisis Militarization: The European Union, the United States and the Iranian Nuclear Program.” In Enduring Crisis? the Politics of Resilience and Transatlantic Order, edited by Harnisch, S, C. Thies, and G. Friedrichs. Abingdon: Routledge. 90-107.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, P. E., T. Keatinge, S. Lain, and E. Rosenberg. 2017. The Future of Transatlantic Sanctions on Russia. Washington: CNAS.
   Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E.G. and G.J. Brandsma. 2018. “The EU Policy Process.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration in Europe, edited by Ongaro, E. and S. van Thiel, 805–821. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Heisbourg, F. 2020. “NATO 4.0: The Atlantic Alliance and the Rise of China.” Survival. Global Politics and Strategy 62 (2): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Ch. 2016. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. 2021. Europe and Biden. Towards a New Transatlantic Pact? Brussels: Wilfried Martens Center for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2015. “The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (3): 399–413. doi:10.1017/S1468109915000158.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. 2020. “The Next Liberal Order.” Foreign Affairs 99 (4): 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2020. “Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Challenge the Liberal Rules-based Order?” Fudan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 13: 113–133. doi:10.1007/s40647-019-00252-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwiak, R. 2019. “EU Ambassadors Approve Sanctions on Eight More Russians over Kerch Strait Incident.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, March 6.
   Google Scholar
• Kausch, K. 2018. “Balancing Trumpism: Transatlantic Divergence in the Middle East.” In Policy Brief, No. 038. Washington: GMF.
   Google Scholar
• Lovatt, H. 2017. “Occupation and Sovereignty: Renewing EU Policy in Israel-Palestine.” In Policy Brief. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Lovatt, H. 2020. Trump’s Deal for Israel-Palestine: Entrenched Unequal Rights and Annexation. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H., and S. G. Brooks. 2021. “Illusions of Autonomy. Why Europe Cannot Provide for Its Security if the United States Pulls Out.” International Security 45 (4): 7–43. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, G. 2020. “A European Strategy for the Indo-Pacific.” The Washington Quarterly 43 (4): 171–185. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2020.1850447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 2018. “Preferences, Power and Institutions in the 21st Century Europe.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (7): 1648–1674. doi:10.1111/jcms.12804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO. 2019. “Defense Expenditures of NATO Countries (2013-2019)”. Press Release, 29 November, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2021. Defense Expenditures of NATO Countries. Press release, June 11.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. A. 2020. “Understanding NATO.” The RUSI Journal 165 (3): 60–72. doi:10.1080/03071847.2020.1777772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentagon. 2018. National Defense Strategy. Washington DC: The US Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, A. 2018. “Introduction: The Occupation at 50: EU-Israel/Palestine Relations since 1967.” Middle East Critique 27 (4): 317–320. doi:10.1080/19436149.2018.1492222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, M. 2017. “The Transatlantic Dialogue on Iran: The European Subaltern and Hegemonic Constraints in the Implementation of the 2015 Nuclear Agreement with Iran.” European Security 26 (1): 99–119. doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1240676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2021. “NATO to Agree Larger Iraq Training Force as Violence Rises”. World News, February 16.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, F. 2019. Iran’s Foreign Policy after the Nuclear Agreement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. 2016. “(Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Foreign and Security Policies.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 353–369. doi:10.1111/jcms.12288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsmose, J., and M. Webber. 2020. “Hedging Their Bets? the Case for a European Pillar in NATO.” Defence Studies 20 (4): 295–317. doi:10.1080/14702436.2020.1823835.
   Google Scholar
• Ripsman, N., Taliaferro, J.W., Lobell, S.E. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51 (1): 144–172. doi:10.1017/S0043887100007814.
   Google Scholar
• Schafranek, N. 2019. “NATO and the EU Training Missions in Iraq – An Opportunity to Enhance Cooperation”. NDC Politic Brief, 17 August.
   Google Scholar
• Schreer, B. 2019. “Trump, NATO and the Future of Europe’s Defense.” The RUSI Journal 164 (1): 10–17. doi:10.1080/03071847.2019.1605011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sestak, J. 2020. “The US Navy’s Loss of Command of the Seas to China and How to Regain It.” The Texas National Security Review 4 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shagina, M. 2021. “Towards a Trans-Atlantic Strategy on Russia Sanctions”. War on the Rocks, December 6.
   Google Scholar
• Silove, N. 2016. “The Pivot before the Pivot. US Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia.” International Security 40 (4): 45–88. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2018. “The EU, the US and the Crisis of Contemporary Multilateralism.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 539–553. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1488836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M. 2017. “Trump Withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership”. Brookings, March 24.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeny, S., and N. Winn. 2020. “EU Security and Defense Cooperation in Times of Dissent: Analyzing PESCO, the European Defense Fund and the European Intervention Initiative (EI2) in the Shadow of Brexit.” Defence Studies 20 (3): 224–249. doi:10.1080/14702436.2020.1778472.
   Google Scholar
• Tabrizi, A. B., and B. Kienzle. 2020. “The High Representative and Directoires in European Foreign Policy: The Case of Nuclear Negotiations with Iran.” European Security 29 (3): 320–336. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharoor, I. 2021. “As the US Leaves Afghanistan, Europe Sours on Biden”. Washington Post, 31 August.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2021. European Strategic Autonomy: What It Is, Why We Need It, How to Achieve It. Rome: IAI.
   Google Scholar
• UK. 2020. “UK NV Note Verbale No. 162/20”, New York, 16 September.
   Google Scholar
• White House. 2017. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: White House.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, M. 2019. “Is a New Cold War Inevitable? Chinese Perspectives on US-Strategic Competition.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 12 (2): 371–394. doi:10.1093/cjip/poz010.
   Google Scholar