Trianon and its aftermath: British geography and the ‘dismemberment’ of Hungary, c.1915-c.1922

References

• Ablonczy, B. (2007). Pál Teleki. The life of a controversial Hungarian politician. Wayne, NJ: Center for Hungarian Studies and Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, E. (1945). Geographic training, wartime research, and immediate professional objectives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 35(2), 121–143. doi: 10.1080/00045604509357271
   Google Scholar
• American Geographical Society Archives and Library [Dates as shown], Correspondence (by names and date).
   Google Scholar
• [Anon.]. (1918). The geographical bearings of the armistice terms. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 34(12), 441–448. doi: 10.1080/14702541808554172
   Google Scholar
• [Anon.]. (1919). The American geographical society’s contribution to the peace conference. Geographical Review, 7(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• [Anon.]. (1920). Geography at the congress of Paris, 1919. The Geographical Journal, 55(4), 309–312.
   Google Scholar
• [Anon.]. (1920–1922). The Hungarian peace negotiations: An account of the work of the Hungarian peace delegation at Neuilly sur Seine, from January to March 1920. Three volumes. Budapest: Hornyánszky.
   Google Scholar
• Balchin, W. (1987). United Kingdom geographers in the second World War: A report. The Geographical Journal, 153(2), 159–180. doi: 10.2307/634869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. (2001). Lives lived and lives told: Biographies of geography’s quantitative revolution. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(6), 409–429. doi: 10.1068/d304
   Google Scholar
• Belloc, H. (1915). The geography of the war. The Geographical Journal, 45(1), 1–13. doi: 10.2307/1779981
   Google Scholar
• Benda, J. (2017). Interjú Teleki Pállal, 1920. január 17. [Interview with Pál Teleki, 7 January, 1920]. In M. Zeidler (Ed.), A magyar békeküldöttség naplója, Neuilly – Versailles – Budapest (1920) [The diary of the Hungarian peace delegation, Neuilly – Versailles – Budapest, 1920] (pp. 75). Budapest: MTA BTK Történettudományi Intézet.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, I. (1922). The new world: Problems in political geography. Yonkers-on-Hudson: World Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Caples, M. (2005). Et in Hungaria ego: Trianon, revisionism and the journal Magyar Szemle (1927–1944). Hungarian Studies, 19(1), 52–104. doi: 10.1556/HStud.19.2005.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, G. (n.d.). But from internal evidence, ca. December 1919). [Chisholm papers]. (Gen. 1060/79, f. 227), centre for research collections. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Cholnoky, J. (1942). Utazásom Amerikában Teleki Pál gróffal [My travels in America with count Pál Teleki]. Budapest: Vajda – Wichmann Kiadás.
   Google Scholar
• Cholnoky, J. (1998). Önéletrajz [Autobiography]. Vár ucca tizenhét, 6(2), 185–339.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, D., & Barnes, T. (2015). Continental European geographers and World War II. Journal of Historical Geography, 47(1), 11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2014.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Clout, H. (2005). Lessons from experience: French geographers and the Transcontinental Excursion of 1912. Progress in Human Geography, 28(5), 597–618. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph507oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deák, F. (1942). Hungary at the peace Conference: The diplomatic history of the Treaty of Trianon. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhand, O. (2018). The idea of Central Europe: Geopolitics, culture and regional identity. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, G., (Ed.). (2001). Geography: Discipline, profession and subject since 1870. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. (1920a). Economic-geographical map of Hungary: Designed on the grounds of official data, in collaboration with Pal Teleki and professor Eugene Cholnoky. Budapest: Hungarian Geographical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. (1920b). The geographical impossibility of the Czech state. London: Low, Dawson & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. (1928). The Treaty of Trianon in the light of geography. In A. Apponyi, et al. (Ed.), Justice for Hungary: Review and criticism of the effect of the Treaty of Trianon (pp. 327–360). London: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. (2016). Élettörténet [life history]. In R. Győri & S. Jobbitt (Eds.), Fodor Ferenc önéletírásai. [Ferenc Fodor’s Autobiographies) (pp. 235–350). Budapest: ELTE Eötvös József Collegium.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, L. (1963). The inquiry: American preparations for peace. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburger, N. (2016). Academic networks and scholarly circulation between wars and peace (1912–1919). The expertise of Jovan Cvijić and his colleagues geographers through the cases of Trieste and Fiume. Cybergeo, document 784. doi: 10.4000/cybergeo.27690
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z. (2000). A magyar földrajztudomány és a trianoni békeszerződés, 1918–1920 [Hungarian geography and the peace Treaty of Trianon, 1918-1920]. Kisebbségkutatás, 9, 224–233.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, M. (1995). The spoils of war: The Société de Géographie de Paris and the French empire, 1914–1919. In M. Bell, R. A. Butlin, & M. Heffernan (Eds.), Geography and Imperialism, 1820–1940 (pp. 221–264). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, M. (1996). Geography, cartography and military intelligence: The Royal geographical Society and the first World War. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, 504–533. doi: 10.2307/622594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdich, T. (1916). Political frontiers and boundary making. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holdich, T. (1918). Boundaries in Europe and the Near East. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holdich, T., Hedley, W. C., Brigham, A. P., Brooker, E. P., Hutchinson, H. N., Close, C. F., … Ogilvie, A. G. (1915). Cartographic needs of physical geography: Discussion. The Geographical Journal, 45(1), 61–68. doi: 10.2307/1779986
   Google Scholar
• Holdich, H., & Lyde, L. (1915). The geography of the war: Discussion. The Geographical Journal, 45(1), 13–15. doi: 10.2307/1779982
   Google Scholar
• Kain, R., & Delano-Smith, C. (2003). Geography displayed: Maps and mapping. In R. Johnston & M. Williams (Eds.), A century of British geography (pp. 371–427). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, G. (2009). Geopolitics and empire: The legacy of Halford Mackinder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keményfi, R. (2010). Cartography as a tool of nation-building in Hungary and means of legitimizing Hungarian ethnic borders and spaces. Hungarian Studies, 24(2), 169–179. doi: 10.1556/HStud.24.2010.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Konopska, B. (2016). The cartographic materials auxiliary in the determination of the borders of Poland during the Paris peace conference 1919-1920. Polish Cartographical Review, 48(2), 67–75. doi: 10.1515/pcr-2016-0006
   Google Scholar
• Krasznai, Z. (2012). Földrajztudomány, oktatás és propaganda. (A nemzeti terület reprezentációja a két világháború közti Magyarországon.) [Geography, Education and Propaganda. The representation of national space in Interwar Hungary]. Pécs: IDResearch Kft / Publikon Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Labbé, M. (2018). Eugene Romer’s 1916 Atlas of Poland: Creating a new nation state. Imago Mundi, 70(1), 94–113. doi: 10.1080/03085694.2018.1382118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansing, R. (1921). The peace negotiations: A personal narrative. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Légrády, O. (1930). Justice for Hungary! The cruel errors of Trianon. Budapest: Nyomatott Légrády Testvérek műintézetében.
   Google Scholar
• Lyde, L. (1915). Some frontiers of to-morrow: An aspiration for Europe. London: A. & C. Black.
   Google Scholar
• Lyde, L. (1921). The international rivers of Europe. Report of the Eighty-Seventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (pp. 213–20). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Lyde, L., & Mockler-Ferryman, A. F. (1905). A military geography of the Balkan peninsula. London: Adam and Charles Black.
   Google Scholar
• Lyde, L., Trotter, H., Fairgrieve, H., Nichols, S., Maudslay, W., & Wallis, B. (1916). Distribution of nationalities in Hungary: A discussion. The Geographical Journal, 47(3), 187–188. doi: 10.2307/1779299
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, H. G. (1915). The importance of geographical research. The Geographical Journal, 46(4), 254–269. doi: 10.2307/1780223
   Google Scholar
• Macartney, C. (1937). Hungary and her successors: The treaty of Trianon and its consequences 1919-1937. London: Oxford University and the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder, H. (1919). Democratic ideals and reality: A study in the politics of reconstruction. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, K. (2011). G. G. Chisholm, A. G. Ogilvie and the 1912 America Transcontinental Excursion. Scottish Geographical Journal, 127(3), 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, M. (2001). Peacemakers: The Paris peace Conference of 1919 and its attempt to end war. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Maddrell, A. (2008). ‘Map girls’: British women geographers’ war work, shifting gender boundaries and reflection on the history of geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(1), 127–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. (2015). American geography and geographers: Toward geographical science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, J. (1914). Economic geography. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, J. (1920). The reconstruction of Europe. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 36(4), 217–232. doi: 10.1080/00369222008734328
   Google Scholar
• McF [McFarlane], J. (1915). Geography at the British association. The Geographical Journal, 46(5), 374–380.
   Google Scholar
• MFT. (1918). A Magyar Földrajzi Társaság szózata a világ Földrajzi Társaságaihoz. [Manifesto of the Hungarian geographical society to geographical societies of the World]. Földrajzi Közlemények, 46, 289–320.
   Google Scholar
• Naval Intelligence Department. (1919). The peoples of Austria–Hungary. I. Hungary. Atlas. London: H. M. Government.
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1915a). Geographical aspects of Balkan problems. London: John Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1915b). The Balkan peninsula: Its peoples and its problems. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 31(6), 281–303. doi: 10.1080/14702541508555330
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1917). Race and nationality. The Geographical Journal, 50(5), 313–328. doi: 10.2307/1779834
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1920). Aftermath: A geographical study of the peace terms. Edinburgh: W. & A. K. Johnston.
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1921). Some geographical aspects of nationality and internationalism. Report of the Eighty-Seventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (p. 224). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1922a). The Mediterranean city-state in Dalmatia. Report of the Eighty-Ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (p. 430). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1922b). Human geography: First principles and some applications. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 38(4), 209–221. doi: 10.1080/14702542208554246
   Google Scholar
• Newbigin, M. (1923). Human geography: First principles and some applications. Report of the Ninetieth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (pp. 94–105). London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, H. (1933). Peacemaking 1919. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. Diaries [Dates as shown], University of Edinburgh Collections.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1918, November 13). [Letter to A. R. Hinks]. (CB8, Ogilvie to Hinks), RGS-IBG Archives, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1915). Cartographic needs of physical geography. The Geographical Journal, 45(1), 46–61. doi: 10.2307/1779985
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1919, February 6). Diaries.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1919, May 22). Diaries.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1919, May 29). Diaries.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1920). A contribution to the geography of Macedonia. The Geographical Journal, 55(1), 1–30. doi: 10.2307/1781481
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1921). Physiography and settlement in southern Macedonia. Geographical Review, 11(2), 172–197. doi: 10.2307/207324
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1922). Some aspects of boundary settlement at the peace conference. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, A. (1924). Modern geography as a study and as an aid. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 40(1), 65–74. doi: 10.1080/00369222408734407
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, E. Diaries [Dates as shown], University of Edinburgh Collections.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie Papers. [Dates as shown], University of Edinburgh Collections.
   Google Scholar
• Palsky, G. (2002). Emmanuel de Martonne and the ethnographical cartography of central Europe (1917–1920). Imago Mundi, 54(1), 111–119. doi: 10.1080/03085690208592961
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. H. (1982). Mackinder: Geography as an aid to statecraft. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, P. (2003). Major trends in Hungarian foreign policy from the collapse of the monarchy to the peace treaty of Trianon. Hungarian Studies, 17(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1556/HStud.17.2003.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Peterecz, P. (2017). Reflections of and about Hungary in the English-speaking world in the interwar years. Hungarian Studies, 31(2), 237–250. doi: 10.1556/044.2017.32.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. Z. (2011). Shoes along the Danube. Durham, CT: Strategic Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Reisser, W. (2012). The Black book: Woodrow Wilson’s secret plan for peace. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Report on the Work of the Printing Section, R.E. from January to December 1916. (Ogilvie Papers, Centre for Research Collections, University of Edinburgh ).
   Google Scholar
• RGS-IBG Archives, [Dates as given, by CB (Correspondence Block), and correspondents].
   Google Scholar
• Romsics, I. (2002). The dismantling of historic Hungary: The peace treaty of Trianon, 1920. Wayne, NJ: Center for Hungarian Studies and Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Seegel, S. (2018). Map men: Transnational lives and deaths of geographers in the making of East Central Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segyevy, D. Z. (2016). Térképművek Trianon árnyékában. Magyarország néprajzi térképe (1918). [Maps among the shades of Trianon. The etnographical map of Hungary, 1918]. Budapest: KSH Könyvtár.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. (2015). The Versailles settlement: Peacemaking in Paris, 1919. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2003). American empire: Roosevelt’s geographer and the prelude to globalization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, P. (1918, December 25). [Letter to Isaiah Bowman]. American Geographical Society Library. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Libraries. American Geographical Society of New York Records, 1723-2010, bulk 1854-2000. AGSNY AC 1, Box 189, Folder 9. Retrieved from https://collections.lib.uwm.edu/digital/collection/agsny/id/45285.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, P. (1918, November 6). [Letter to Jenő Cholnoky]. Hungarian Geographical Museum, Érd, Cholnoky Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, P. (1919a). Short notes on the economic and political geography of Hungary. Budapest: Hornyánszky.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, P. (1919b). An ethnographical map of Hungary, based on the density of population. Budapest: Hungarian Geographical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, P. (1923). The evolution of Hungary and its place in European history. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley, H. (1920). A history of the peace conference of Paris ( Six volumes). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, A. (2014). The deluge: The Great War and the remaking of global order. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• University of Edinburgh Collections, Chisholm, G., Papers and Diaries, Gen. 1060/79.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, B. (1911). The use of statistics in the teaching of geography. The Geographical Teacher, 6(2), 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, B. (1916). Distribution of nationalities in Hungary. The Geographical Journal, 47(3), 177–187. doi: 10.2307/1779298
   Google Scholar
• Withers, C. (2010a). Geography and science in Britain, 1831–1939: A study of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, C. (2010b). Alan Grant Ogilvie (1887–1954). Geographers Biobibliographical Studies, 29, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, C., Finnegan, D., & Higgitt, R. (2006). Geography’s other histories? Geography and science in the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1831-c.1933. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4), 433–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, M. (2007). Ideas on territorial revision in Hungary, 1920–1945. Wayne, NJ: Center for Hungarian Studies and Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, M. (2017). A magyar békedelegáció tevékenysége. [The Hungarian peace delegation]. In M. Zeidler (Ed.), A magyar békeküldöttség naplója, Neuilly – Versailles – Budapest (1920) [The diary of the Hungarian peace delegation, Neuilly – Versailles – Budapest, 1920] (pp. 13–44). Budapest: MTA BTK Történettudományi Intézet.
   Google Scholar