Beyond the chintz: making room to live

References

• Ahmed, S. (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787799900200303
   Google Scholar
• Bammer, A. (1992). Editorial: Question of home. New Formations, 1992(17), vii–xi.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project (Prepared on the basis of the German volume, R. Tiedemann, Ed.; H. Eiland & K. McLaghlin, Trans.). Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1999). Experience and poverty (R. Livingstone, Trans.). In M. W. Jennings, H. Eiland, & G. Smith (Eds.), Selected writings: Vol. 2. 1927–1934 (pp. 731–735). Belknap Press. (Original work published 1933).
   Google Scholar
• Bletter, R. H. (1981). The interpretation of the glass dream: Expressionist architecture and the history of the crystal metaphor. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 40(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/989612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2022). Home (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., & Varley, A. (2004). Geographies of home. Cultural Geographies, 11(3), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474004eu289xx
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E., & Littler, J. (2022). Mrs Hinch, the rise of the cleanfluencer and the neoliberal refashioning of housework: Scouring away the crisis? The Sociological Review, 70(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211059591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, L. (1976). The rationalization of housework. In D. Leonard, & S. Allen (Eds.), Dependence and exploitation in work and marriage (pp. 121–151). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo, & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. T. (1996). Domestic differences: Edith Farnsworth, Mies van der Rohe, and the gendered body. In C. Reed (Ed.), Not at home: The suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture (pp. 179–192). Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, J. (2004). The parlour and the suburb: Domestic identities, class, femininity and modernity. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, J. R. (1997). A world of their own making: Myth, ritual, and the quest for family values. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (2023, February 1). Tate Modern viewing platform invades privacy of flats, supreme court rules. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/feb/01/tate-modern-viewing-platform-invades-privacy-of-flats-supreme-court-rules.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, H. (2005). Modernity and domesticity: Tensions and contradictions. In H. Heynen, & G. Baydar (Eds.), Negotiating domesticity: Spatial productions of gender in modern architecture (pp. 1–29). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. (1994). Difference, dilemmas, and the politics of home. Social Research, 61(3), 563–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. (2004). Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: Domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthewson, G. (2009). People who live in glass houses: Walter Benjamin and the dream of glass architecture. In J. Gatley (Ed.), Cultural crossroads: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand [CD-ROM]. SAHANZ.
   Google Scholar
• Nethercote, M. (2022). Racialized geographies of home: Property, unhoming and other possible futures. Progress in Human Geography, 46(4), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221104480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (2019). The sociology of housework. Polity Press. (Original work published 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. (1999). Geographies of identity and difference: Marking boundaries. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 151–167). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, C. (1996). Introduction. In C. Reed (Ed.), Not at home: The suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture (pp. 7–17). Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, D. (2005). Private/public. In D. Atkinson, P. Jackson, D. Sibley, & N. Washbourne (Eds.), Cultural geography: A critical dictionary of key concepts (pp. 155–160). I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Tosh, J. (1999). A man’s world: Masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herck, K. (2005). 'Only where comfort ends, does humanity begin’: On the ‘coldness’ of avant-garde architecture in the Weimar period. In H. Heynen, & G. Baydar (Eds.), Negotiating domesticity: Spatial productions of gender in modern architecture (pp. 123–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Varley, A. (2008). A place like this? Stories of dementia, home and the self. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (2013, August 19). The art of peeping: Photography at the limits of privacy. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/photography-blog/2013/aug/19/art-peeping-photography-privacy-arne-svenson.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2011). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1990).
   Google Scholar