Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks

References

• Ballantyne , R. , Hughes , K. and Mylonas , A. 2002 . Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 (5) : 427 – 441 .
   Google Scholar
• Bhalerao , A. and Ward , A. 2001 . Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study . ALT‐J , 9 (1) : 26 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Black , P. and Wiliam , D. 1998 . Assessment and classroom learning . Assessment in Education , 5 (1) : 7 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. , Cohen , R. and Sampson , J. 1999 . Peer learning and assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 24 (4) : 413 – 426 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , S. , Race , P. and Smith , B. 1997 . 500 tips on assessment , London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , P. 2000 . Computerised peer assessment . Innovations in Education and Training International , 37 (4) : 346 – 355 .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , P. 2002 . Using student reflective self‐assessment for awarding degree classifications . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 39 (4) : 307 – 319 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies , P . 2003a . Closing the communications loop on the computerised peer‐assessment of essays . ALT‐J , 11 (1) : 41 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , P. 2003b . “ Peer‐assessment: no marks required, just feedback? Evaluating the quality of computerised peer‐feedback compared with computerised peer‐marking ” . In Research Proceedings of the 10th ALT Conference, Sepember 2003 , Edited by: Cook , J. and McConnell , D. 143 – 156 . The Association for Learning Technology .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , P. 2004 . Don’t write, just mark: the validity of assessing student ability via their computerized peer‐marking of an essay rather than their creation of an essay . ALT‐J , 12 (3) : 261 – 278 .
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 1995 . Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment . Innovations in Education and Training International , 32 (2) : 175 – 187 .
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan , S. J. and Isaacs , G. 2001 . Assessing self‐ and peer‐assessment: the student’s views . Higher Education Research & Development , 20 (1) : 53 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Higgins , R. , Hartley , P. and Skelton , A. 2002 . The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment in student learning . Studies in Higher Education , 27 (1) : 53 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd , C. 2000 . Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics . Active Learning in Higher Education , 1 (1) : 28 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Lin , S. S. J. , Liu , E. S. F. and Yuan , S. M. 2001 . Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 17 : 430 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch , A. 2003 . Exploring the practice of feedback to students . Active Learning in Higher Education , 4 (1) : 24 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Rada , R. and Hu , K. 2002 . Patterns in student–student commenting . IEEE Transactions on Education , 45 (3) : 262 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson , J. 2002 . In search of fairness: an application of multi‐reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 26 (2) : 183 – 192 .
   Google Scholar
• Russell , T. 1998 . Effective feedback skills , (2nd edn) , London : Kogan Page .
   Google Scholar
• Stefani , L. A. J. 1994 . Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities . Studies in Higher Education , 19 (1) : 69 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefani , L. A. J. 1998 . Assessment in partnership with learners . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 23 (4) : 339 – 350 .
   Google Scholar