References
- Allen, G. (2008). Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 105–116.
- Baetz, M., & Sharp, D. (2004). Integrating ethics content into the core business curriculum: Do core teaching materials do the job? Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 53–62.
- Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project (4th ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Buckley, C. A. (2011). Student and staff perceptions of the research-teaching nexus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 313–322.
- Cortada, J. W. (1998). Rise of the knowledge worker. Burlington: Elsevier.
- Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
- Doyle, E., Mullins, M., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Research ethics in a business school context: The establishment of a review committee and the primary issues of concern. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 43–66.
- Gibson, P. R., Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. A. (1996). Undergraduate research groups: Two models. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 36–38.
- Gioia, D. A. (2002). Business education’s role in the crisis of corporate confidence. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 16, 142–144.
- Haggerty, K. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 391–414.
- Hoecht, A. (2011). Whose ethics, whose accountability? A debate about University research ethics committees. Ethics and Education, 6, 253–266.
- Kinkead, J. (2003). Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 5–17.
- Kleinman, D. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2001). Science, capitalism, and the rise of the knowledge worker: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society, 30, 451–492.
- Löfström, E. (2011). “Does plagiarism mean anything? LOL”. Students’ conceptions of writing and citing. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 257–275.
- MacFarlane, B. (2007). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. New York, NY: Routledge.
- MacFarlane, B. (2009). Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic enquiry. London, New York: Routledge.
- MacFarlane, B. (2010). Values and virtues in qualitative research. In M. Savin-Baden, & C. H. Major (Eds.), New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty. London: Routledge.
- Owen, M. (2006). Conflict and convergence: The ethics review of action research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4, 61–75.
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548–549.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
- Smith, P., & Rust, C. (2011). The potential of research based learning for the creation of truly inclusive academic communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 115–125.
- Starke, M. C. (1985). A research practicum: Undergraduates as assistants in psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 158–160.
- Tilley, S. (2008). A troubled dance: Doing the work of research ethics review. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 91–104.
- Van Den Hoonaard, W. (2006). The ethics trapeze. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4, 1–10.
- Warwick, D. (1973). Tearoom trade: Means and ends in social research. The Hasting Center Studies, 1, 27–38.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112448/MPU-L1SN.png"})