Peer learning for change in higher education

References

• Archer, L., Hutchings, M., Leathwood, C., & Ross, A. (2003). Widening participation in higher education: Implications for policy and practice. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 193–202). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Arendale, D. (1994). Understanding the supplemental instruction model. In D. C. Martin, & D. Arendale (Eds.), Supplemental instruction: Increasing achievement and retention (pp. 11–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (Trans. V. W. McGee) (pp. 60–103). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: a critical business. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaba, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other Boud D. Cohen R. Sampson J. Kogan Page London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 501–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Congos, D., & Schoeps, N. (1993). Does supplemental instruction really work and what is it anyway? Studies in Higher Education, 18, 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, V., & Gosling, D. (2001). Joining the dots: Reconceptualising educational development. Active Learning, 2, 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Edinburgh Napier University (2012). Hearing the student voice. February 19, 2012, Retrieved from: http://www2.napier.ac.uk/studentvoices/
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (2000). Building employability skills into the higher education curriculum: A university-wide initiative. Education & Training, 42, 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J., & Winterbottom, M. (2011). Peer-tutoring: What’s in it for the tutor? Educational Studies, 37, 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2001). Educational development units in the UK – what are they doing five years on? The International Journal for Academic Development, 6, 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagyard, A., & Watling, S. (2011). The student as producer, learning by doing research. In P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield, & M. Verity (Eds.), Learning development in higher education (pp. 169–182). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, D., & Potter, J. (2009). The rise and development of peer learning within UK Universities. In D. Hampton, & J. Potter, (Eds.), Students supporting students (pp. 5–8). SEDA Special 26: Birmingham: SEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsdon, J. (2004). Learning development in higher education network: An emerging community of practice? Educational Developments, 5, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsdon, J. (2011). What is learning development? In P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield, & M. Verity (Eds.), Learning development in higher education (pp. 13–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, M., Jacobs, G., & Gilbert, M. (2006). The basic SI model. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 106, 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation and desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundell, D., & Higbee, J. (Eds.). (2002). Histories of developmental education. The Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as ‘academic literacies’: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17, 192–207.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E., McIntosh Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCIHE (1997). Higher education in the learning society (the Dearing report). London: National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2009). The student as producer. In N. Neary, H. Stevenson, & L. Bell (Eds.), The future of higher education: Policy, pedagogy and the student experience (pp. 192–210). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. (2009). The effect of peer assisted learning support (PALS) on performance in mathematics and chemistry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plymouth University (2012). Students as partners. February 02, 2012, Retrieved from http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/studentgateway/Pages/studentsaspartners.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (1996). Learning development in HE: Deficit or difference? In S. Wolfendale, & J. Corbett (Eds.), Opening doors: Learning support in higher education (pp. 17–30). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M. L., & McDaniel, A. (2006). Benefits to supplemental instruction leaders. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 106, 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Northampton, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, S. (1996). Learning support in higher education: Principles, values, continuities. In S. Wolfendale, & J. Corbett (Eds.), Opening doors: Learning support in higher education. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar