Motivational support in Web 2.0 learning environments: a regression analysis based on the integrative theory of motivation, volition and performance

References

• Aharony, N. (2009). The influence of LIS students’ personality characteristics on their perceptions towards Web 2.0 use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41, 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Astleitner, H., & Wiesner, C. (2004). An integrated model of multimedia learning and motivation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2007, May). Social network sites: Public, private, or what? Knowledge Tree, 13 Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://kt.flexiblelearning.net.au/tkt2007/?page_id=28
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2011). A comparative study of using blogs and wikis for collaborative knowledge construction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38, 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. R., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2009). Microblogs in higher education- a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo, D. R. T., Kasemvilas, S., Ractham, P., & Zhang, X. (2009). Fostering participation in an online intellectual community in a graduate educational setting: A case study. In Proceedings of 2009 Fourth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, 254–260. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=50725
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. American Psychologists, 54, 493–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. M., & Mims, C. (2009). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Characteristics, implications and limitations. In T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web 2.0 (pp. 343–360). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Waycott, J., Clerehan, R., Hamilton, M., Richardson, J., Sheard, J., & Thompson, C. (2012). Worth it? Findings from a study of how academics assess students’ Web 2.0 activities. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1–15. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16153.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Method, 7, 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. H., Huang, W. Y., Diefes-Dux, H., & Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction model-based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Lepper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzik, L., & Herstatt, C. (2008, September). Innovation communities: Motivation and incentives for community members to contribute. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE ICMIT, Bangok, Thailand (pp. 350–335).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O’Connor, D. L., Khalil, M. K., & Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10, 437–454.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2008a). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 6, 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2008b). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29, 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2008). Characterizing the different blogging behaviours of students on an online distance learning course. Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J. W., Miller, C., & Newnham, L. (2008). RSS and content syndication in higher education: Subscribing to a new model of teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 45, 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun. A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007, December). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference 2007, Singapore (pp. 664–673).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2007). Web 2.0: Does it really matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 177–183.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., Lehtonen, E., Kurvinen, E., & Raento, M. (2009). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perifanou, M. A. (2009). Language micro-gaming: Fun and informal microblogging activities for language learning. In M. D. Lytras, P. O. de Pablos, E. Damiani, D. Avison, A. Naeve, & D. G. Horner (Eds.), Best practices for the knowledge society. Knowledge, learning, development and technology for all. Communications in computer and information science (pp. 1–14). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prasarnphanich, P., & Wagner, C. (2009). The role of wiki technology and altruism in collaborative knowledge creation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49, 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rethlefsen, M. L., Piorun, M., & Prince, D. (2009). Teaching Web 2.0 technologies using Web 2.0 technologies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences. Educational Technology & society, 12, 98–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, C., Helic, C., & Gutl, C. (2007). E-Learning practices and Web 2.0. In Proceedings of ICL 2007, Villach, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning – A critical review. Paper for OCED-KERIS expert meeting, South Korea, 16–19 October 2007. Session 6 – Alternative Learning Environments in Practice: Using ICT to Change Impact and Outcomes. Retrieved from https://www1.oecd.org/edu/ceri/39458556.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer, D. R. (1996). Motivation: The neglected factor in instructional design. Educational Technology, 36, 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C.-H., Blocher, M., & Roberts, G. (2008). Constructs for Web 2.0 learning environments: a theatrical metaphor. Educational Media International, 45, 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Waycott, J., Gray, K., Clerehan, R., Hamilton, M., Richardson, J., Sheard, J., & Thompason, C. (2010). Implications for academic integrity of using Web 2.0 for teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal for Education Integrity, 6, 8–18.
   Google Scholar