795
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Turnitin said it wasn’t happy’: can the regulatory discourse of plagiarism detection operate as a change artefact for writing development?

&

References

  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 187–203.
  • Bean, J. (2001). Engaging ideas. San Francisco, NC: JosseyBass.
  • Catt, R., & Gregory, G. (2006). The point of writing: Is student writing in higher education developed or merely assessed? In L. Gnobscik-Williams (Ed.), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education (pp. 16–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Davis, M. (2007). The role of Turnitin within the formative process of academic writing: A tool for learning and unlearning. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2, Retrieved January 15, 2010, from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/the_role_of_turnitin_within_the_formative_process_of_academic_writing/
  • Davis, M., & Yeang, F. (2008). Encouraging international and dyslexic students to develop better learning strategies for writing through the use of Turnitin, 2. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/encouraging_international_and_dyslexic_students_to_develop_better_learning/
  • Elander, J., Pittam, G., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2010). Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 157–171.
  • Gannon-Leary, P., Trayhurn, D., & Home, M. (2009). Good images, effective messages? Working with students and educators on academic practice understanding. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33, 435–448.
  • Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
  • Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism: A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 233–245.
  • Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organisational change. Organization, 12, 437–456.
  • Mitchell, S., & Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (2008, September). The role of writing development work in the University: Realities & visions (iPED). Conference Keynote Address, Coventry University, UK.
  • Parker, A., & Tritter, J. Q. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: Reflections on current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29, 23–37.
  • Turnitin.com. (2010). Quick facts. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from Turnitin website: http://www.turnitin.com/static/index.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.