‘Collaborative critique’ in a supervisor development programme

References

• Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373–395. doi:10.1177/0891241605280449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, A. V. (2011). Challenges to doctoral research and supervision quality: A theoretical approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3576–3581. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.338
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. Bennett, & M. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 147–165). Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231129
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, E. M. (2007). Supervising higher degrees as a scholarly practice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21, 1010–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1999). Situating academic development in professional work: Using peer learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 4, 3–10. doi:10.1080/1360144990040102
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2004). Changing postgraduate supervision practice: A programme to encourage learning through reflection and feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 5–22. doi:10.1080/1470329032000172685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2009). Supervision development and recognition in a reflexive space. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (1997). A case study of accredited training for research awards supervisors through reflective practice. Higher Education, 34, 483–498. doi:10.1023/A:1003090314197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton, L., Creighton, T., & Parks, D. (2010). Mentoring to degree completion: Expanding the horizons of doctoral protégés. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. (2008). Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment. Studies in Continuing Education, 30, 51–67. doi:10.1080/01580370701841549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 213–226. doi:10.1080/14703290902843984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange, N., Pillay, G., & Chikoko, V. (2011). Doctoral learning: A case for a cohort model of supervision and support. South African Journal of Education, 31, 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: On developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2009). S/he who pays the piper calls the tune? Professionalism, developmentalism, and the paucity of in-service education within the research profession. Professional Development in Education, 35, 289–304. doi:10.1080/13674580802532688
   Google Scholar
• Fenge, L.-A. (2011). Enhancing the doctoral journey: The role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, A., & Martens, E. (2008). Transforming supervisors? A critique of postliberal approaches to research supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 279–289. doi:10.1080/13562510802045303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2009). The transcultural academic: Cosmopolitanism and the imagined community of the global academy. Journal of the World Universities Forum, 2, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 557–570. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayano, D. M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization, 38, 99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 7–26. doi:10.1080/08923649509526885
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. M. (2007). Developing effective supervisors: Concepts of research supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21, 680–693.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 267–281. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2011). Successful research supervision: Advising students doing research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2005). The development of research supervision: ‘Turning the light on a private space’. International Journal for Academic Development, 10, 17–30. doi:10.1080/13601440500099977
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., Peseta, T., & McCormack, C. (2010). Supervisor development through creative approaches to writing. International Journal for Academic Development, 15, 33–46. doi:10.1080/13601440903529893
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011). Challenging the taken-for-granted: How research analysis might inform pedagogical practices and institutional policies related to doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2011). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAIRTL (National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning). (2012). Developing an institutional framework for supporting supervisors of research students: A practical guide. Retrieved from http://www.nairtl.ie/workgroupDocs/SupervisorSupport_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150. doi:10.1080/03075070220119986c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., & Kayrooz, C. (2004). Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 99–116. doi:10.1080/1360144042000296107
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Marshall, S. (2009). Institutional development for the enhancement of research and research training. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 145–157. doi:10.1080/13601440902970031
   Google Scholar
• Samara, A. (2006). Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995, 2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Winka, K., & Grysell, T. (2011). Communal roleplay: Using drama to improve supervision. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. Holtham (Eds.), Beyond transmission: Innovations in university teaching (pp. 235–252). Faringdon: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar