The student voice in higher education curriculum design: is there value in listening?

References

• Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 429–440.10.1080/03075070902771978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., Parry, G., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 435–449.10.1080/13562510120078009
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57–75.10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. (2013). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Bulley, C., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: Perspectives from the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 197–209.10.1080/13562517.2010.515024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 133–145.10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F., Beasley, L., Eland, J., & Rumpus, A. (2007). Hearing the student voice: Final report. HEA, Subject Centre for Education, Napier University. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/13053/2/3911.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.796714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Lattuca, L., & Hamilton, E. (2008, July). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 339–353.10.1002/jee.2008.97.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). ‘Change based on what students say’: Preparing teachers for a paradoxical model of leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9, 345–358.10.1080/13603120600895437
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, J., Benfield, G., & Francis, R. (2012). An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 135–147.10.1080/14703297.2012.677595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31, 269–284.10.1080/03075070600680521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Driscoll, P., Lewis, M., Mathews, C., Russell, L., & Cumming, S. (2009). Implementing curriculum evaluation: A case study of a generic undergraduate degree in health sciences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 369–381.10.1080/13562510120061223
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, R., & Casey, M. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mcleod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52, 179–189.10.1080/17508487.2011.572830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, N., & Nulty, D. (2009). How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 565–577.10.1080/02602930802226502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Newman-Ford, L., Fitzgibbon, K., Lloyd, S., & Thomas, S. (2008). A large-scale investigation into the relationship between attendance and attainment: A study using an innovative, electronic attendance monitoring system. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 699–717.10.1080/03075070802457066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, U. (1996). The co-operation with students in course planning and development. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning (pp. 226–236). Headington: The Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2009). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 995–1015.10.1080/01411920903342038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D., & Fletcher, J. (2001). Inside information: Making sense of marketing data. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Speight, S., Lackovic, N., & Cooker, L. (2013). The contested curriculum: Academic learning and employability in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 19, 112–126.10.1080/13583883.2012.756058
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. New York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. (2007). Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago. Journal of Management Education, 31, 339–357.10.1177/1052562906298445
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 167–177.10.1177/1469787410379680
   Google Scholar