The development of an implementation model for ICT in education: an example of the interaction of affordances and multimodality

References

• Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5, 235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, M. (2008). Affordance analysis – Matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International, 45, 3–15.10.1080/09523980701847115
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, T., & Cook, J. (2004). Discussion understanding and using technological affordances: A commentary on Conole and Dyke. ALT-J, 12, 295–299.10.1080/0968776042000259591
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 12, 113–124.10.1080/0968776042000216183
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, C. S. (2005). The semiotic engineering of human computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dicks, B., Soyinka, B., & Coffey, A. (2006). Multimodal ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6, 77–96.10.1177/1468794106058876
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. In S. Robertson, G. Olsen, & J. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI’91 Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 79–84). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to human perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 480–488.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00259.doc.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342.10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M., Jopling, M., Royle, K., & Southern, L. (2009) Evaluation of the training and development agency for schools’ funding for ICT in ITT projects: Final report. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, S., & Reiber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. Ornstein (Ed.), Theory into practice (pp. 154–170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2, 29–57.10.1177/1470357203002001751
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 553–560.10.1177/104973239600600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2009a). Introduction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2009b). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• John, P., & Sutherland, R. (2005). Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. Educational Review, 57, 405–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10, 101–116.10.1080/14759390100200105
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 52, 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). A Curriculum for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 133–145.10.1080/03057640050005825
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Luckin, R., Plowman, L., & Taylor, J. (2000). Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/00/2/
   Google Scholar
• McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000, May). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257–271.10.1080/0022027032000148298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 411–419.10.1080/14703290802377307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar