What are we missing? Spanish lecturers’ perceptions of their assessment practices

References

• Arribas, J. M. (2012). Academic performance in terms of the applied assessment system. RELIEVE, 18, 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v18n1/RELIEVEv18n1_3eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biencinto, C., Carpintero, E., Núñez, C., & García, M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the ActEval questionnaire on university teachers’ assessment activity. RELIEVE, 19, 1–15. doi:10.7203/relieve.19.1.2611.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). Feedback in higher and professional education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.69146210.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, C., Riley, P., & Walta, C. (2009). Education students and their teachers: Comparing views on participative assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 641–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2012). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud, & L. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.10.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2009). Key data on education in Europe 2009. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/105EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Meyer, L., & Anderson, H. (2012). Faculty and students conceptions of assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 64, 119–133. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9484-110.1007/s10734-011-9484-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In D. Boud, & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education. Learning for the Longer Term (pp. 101–113). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, M. S., & Rodríguez, G. (2010). An approach to the dominant discourse of learning assessment in higher education. Revista de Educación, 351, 385–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ljungman, A. G., & Silén, C. (2008). Examination involving students as peer examiners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 289–300.10.1080/02602930701293306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M. (2009). La Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en Docencia Universitaria: Propuestas, Técnicas, Instrumentos y Experiencias [Formative and shared assessment at universities: Proposals, techniques, instruments and experiences]. Madrid: Narcea.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, P., & Simpson, N. (2004). Peer assessment in first year university: How the students feel. Studies in Educational evaluation, 30, 135–149.10.1016/j.stueduc.2004.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 309–323.10.1080/0260293022000001337
   Google Scholar
• Quesada-Serra, V., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2013). ActEval: A questionnaire for the analysis and consideration of university teachers’ assessment activity. Revista de Educación, 362, 69–104. doi:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Gómez, G., Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Gallego-Noche, B., Gómez-Ruiz, M. A., & Quesada, V. (2012). The student’s voice in assessment: A pathway not yet developed at university. RELIEVE, 18, 1–21. doi:10.7203/relieve.18.2.1991
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student involvement in assessment. The training of peer assessment skills. Heerlen: Interuniversity Center for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.64778110.1080/14703297.2012.647781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 101–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297.10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar