The use of feedback systems to improve collaborative text writing: a proposal for the higher education context

References

• Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 387–400.10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practices, 5, 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerratto-Pragman, T. (2003). Collaborating with writing tools. An instrumental perspective on the problem of computer-supported collaborative activities. Interacting with Computers, 15, 737–757.10.1016/j.intcom.2003.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2009). The challenge of making feedback improve student learning. Paper presented at the conference learning through assessment, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports student learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrowa, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, B., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Parkin, H. P., & Thorpe, L. (2013). Engaging students with feedback through adaptive release. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 51–61.10.1080/14703297.2012.748333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JISC. (2010). Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. Bristol: HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass_eada.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, T., Colomina, R., Clarà, M., & Ginesta, A. (2011). Ayudas al aprendizaje en tareas colaborativas con Moodle [Support for learning in collaborative writing tasks with Moodle]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 1103–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2009a). Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment. Scotland: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2009b). Assessment for learner self‐regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 335–352.10.1080/02602930802255139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – A teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 125–135.10.1080/14703290903525911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 148–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). The focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602.10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perception of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379–394.
   Google Scholar