References
- Academy of Science of South Africa. (2010). The PhD study: An evidence-based study on how to meet the demands for high-level skills in an emerging economy. Retrieved from http://www.assaf.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/40696-Boldesign-PHD-small.pdf
- Acker, S. (2011). Reflections on supervision and culture: What difference does difference make? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 413–420.10.1080/14703297.2011.617093
- Aitchison, C., & Paré, A. (2012). Writing as a craft and practice in the doctoral curriculum. In A. Lee & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies (pp. 12 –35). London: Routledge.
- Backhouse, J. (2009). Doctoral education in South Africa: Models, pedagogies and student experiences (Unpublished PhD thesis). School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
- Bak, N. (2011). Professionalising the supervision relationship: A reply to Waghid, Fataar and Hugo. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25, 1047–1061.
- Biggs, J. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 103–110.10.1080/0969595980050106
- Bitzer, E., & Albertyn, R. M. (2011). Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25, 875–888.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
- Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 8. Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9
- Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2009). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House, 83, 1–6.10.1080/00098650903267784
- Central University of Technology. (2014). Student assessment manual 2014. Bloemfontein: Author.
- Danby, S., & Lee, A. (2012). Framing doctoral pedagogy as design and action. In A. Lee & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies (pp. 3–11). London: Routledge.
- Dell, S. (2010). South African decline in PhD numbers a major problem. University World News, 60. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20100820150736361
- Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
- de Valero, Y. (2001). Departmental factors affecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land grant research institute. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 341–367.10.2307/2649335
- Evans, T., & Liou, I. Y. (2011). Institutional pedagogical waypoints: Reflections on doctoral journeys between Taiwan and Australia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 401–411.10.1080/14703297.2011.617086
- Evans, T., & Pearson, M. (1999). Off-campus doctoral research and study in Australia. Review of Australian Research in Education, 5, 185–204.
- Fiegener, M. K. (2009). Number of US doctorates awarded rise for sixth year, but growth slower, Info Brief, NSF (pp. 10–308). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- Frick, L. (2012). Pedagogies for creativity in science doctorates. In A. Lee & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies (pp. 113–127). London: Routledge.
- Gardner, S. K. (Ed.). (2009). Special issue: The development of doctoral students – Phases of challenge and support. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34, 1–127.
- Gill, P., & Burnard, P. (2008). The student–supervisor relationship in the PhD/Doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing, 17, 668–671.10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29484
- Grant, B. (2003). Mapping the pleasures and risks of supervision. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24, 173–190. Retrieved from http://moodle.unitec.ac.nz/file.php/1606/Supervision/Barbara_Grants_resources_on_supervision/Grant_2003-Discourse.pdf
- Grant, B. M. (2010). Negotiating the layered relations of supervision. In M. Walker & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion: Supporting effective research in the social sciences (pp. 88–105). London: Routledge.
- Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 151–163.10.1080/07294360500062953
- Gurr, G. (2001). Negotiating the “Rackety Bridge” – A dynamic model for aligning supervisory style with research student development. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 81–92.10.1080/07924360120043882
- Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 79–92.10.1080/03075070902906798
- Hugo, W. (2009). Spiraling reference: A case study of apprenticeship into an academic community of practice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 23, 703–721.
- Johansson, R. (2003). Case study methodology. Presentation at the International Conference “Methodologies in Housing Research” organized by the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
- LaPidus, J. B. (1997). Doctoral education: Preparing for the future. Retrieved from http://CiteSeerxist.psu.edu
- Lee, A., & Danby, S. (2012). Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies: Framing doctoral pedagogy as design and action. London: Routledge.
- Lovitts, B. (2005). How to grade a dissertation. Academe, 91, 18–23.
- Manathung, C. (2011). Moments of transculturation and assimilation: Post-colonial explorations of supervision and culture. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 367–376.10.1080/14703297.2011.617089
- Nerad, M. (2009). The context for increasing the quantity and assuring the quality of doctoral education in South Africa: What we know about the increase in PhD production and reform of doctoral education worldwide. Paper presented at the ASSAf Panel on the PhD, Pretoria.
- Pearson, M. (2005). Framing research on doctoral education in Australia in a global context. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 119–134.10.1080/07294360500062870
- Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 57, 135–150.10.1080/03075070220119986c
- Phillips, E. M., & Puh, D. S. (2005). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Berkshire: Open University Press.
- Rose, G. L. (2003). Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale. Research in Higher Education, 44, 473–494.10.1023/A:1024289000849
- The South African Qualifications Authority. (2012). Level descriptors for the South African National Qualifications Framework. Retrieved from http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/misc/level_descriptors.pdf
- Stake, R. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of quantitative enquiry (pp. 86–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Waghid, Y. (2007). Education, responsibility and democratic justice: Cultivating friendship to alleviate some of the injustices on the African continent. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 182–196.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00305.x
- Wisker, G. (2005). The good supervisor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Wisker, G., Exley, K., Antoniou, M., & Ridley, P. (2008). Working one-to-one with students. Supervising, coaching, mentoring and personal tutoring. New York, NY: Routledge.