References
- Chen, A. (2012, August 22). Students find e-textbooks ‘clumsy’ and don’t use their interactive features. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Wired Campus. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/students-find-e-textbooks-clumsy-and-dont-use-their-interactive-features/39082
- Courseload. (2013a). Alongside solution video. Retrieved from http://www.courseload.com/alongside-video
- Courseload. (2013b). Accessibility commitment. Retrieved from http://www.courseload.com/accessibility
- CourseSmart. (2013). The CourseSmart commitment. Retrieved from http://www.coursesmart.com/accessibility
- Emanuel, R. C. (2013). The American college student cell phone survey. College Student Journal, 47, 75–81.
- Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. The Journal of the Association for Learning Technology, 3, 5–34.10.1080/0968776950030202
- Greenfield, J. (2013). Students still not taking to e-textbooks, new data show. Retrieved from http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2013/students-still-not-taking-to-e-textbooks-new-data-show/
- Hartwig, E. (2013, August 8). MashableReads is your new social book club. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2013/08/08/mashable-reads/
- Internet2. (2012). Internet2 eTextbook Spring 2012 pilot final project report. Retrieved from http://www.internet2.edu/media/medialibrary/2013/10/07/eText-Spring-2012-Pilot-Report.pdf
- Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54, 722–732.
- Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/learningandtech/next-generation-and-digital-natives.pdf
- Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 4–16.10.1007/BF02297354
- Lim, E.-L., & Hew, K.-F. (2014). Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of an E-book with annotative and sharing capabilities as a tool for learning: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 34–45.10.1080/14703297.2013.771969
- Simone, M. (2012, March 26). “Ebooks and E-resources.” Educational technology newsletter, a UMass Boston information technology publication. Retrieved from http://umbedtech.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/ebooks-and-e-resources/
- US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division & US Department of Education. (2010). Re: Electronic book readers. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-20100629.html
- VitalSource. (2012, July 23). Ingram’s VitalSource delivers ‘accessibility release’ to benefit students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ingramcontent.com/PressReleases/Pages/Ingram%E2%80%99s%20VitalSource%20Delivers%20%E2%80%9CAccessibility%20Release%E2%80%9D%20to%20benefit%20students%20with%20disabilities.aspx
- Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 407–428.10.1353/csd.0.0077
- Wunder, G. (2013, February). Information and the right to live in the world: The challenge for the blind of the twenty-first century. Braille Monitor. Retrieved from http://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/bm/bm13/bm1302/bm130202.htm