References
- Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney, Canberra: Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
- Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education (The Bradbury Report). Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/highereducation/review/pages/reviewofaustralianhighereducationreport.aspx
- Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. (2011). Higher education standards framework. Canberra: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
- Grainger, P., Purnell, K., & Zipf, R. (2008). Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 133–142.10.1080/02602930601125681
- Klenowski, V. (2007). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the consensus-based standards validation. Retrieved from http://education.gld.gov.au/cornorate/newbasics/html/lceeval.html
- Klenowski, V., Adie, L., Gunn, Looney, Elwood, Wyatt-Smith, C., & Colbert, P. (2007, November). Moderation as judgement practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice. Australian Association for Research in Education Conference: Research impacts: Proving or improving? Fremantle, Western Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/wya07015.pdf
- Matters, G. (2005). The grading master: A simpler way. EQ Australia, 2, 12–15. Retreived from http://www.eqa.edu.au/site/thegradingmaster.html
- Organisation of Economic and Cultural Development. (2011). Testing student and university performance globally: OECD’s AHELO. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_2649_35961291_40624662_1_1_1_1,00.html
- Race, P. (2006). The lecturer’s toolkit (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
- Readman, K., & Allen, R. (2013). Practical planning and assessment. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
- Reddy, M. Y. (2014). Design and development of rubrics to improve assessment outcomes. Quality Assurance in Education, 19, 84–104.
- Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191–209.10.1080/0305498870130207
- Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175–194.10.1080/0260293042000264262
- Sadler, D. R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14, 387–392.10.1080/09695940701592097
- Sadler, D. R. (2009a, November). Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education. 34, 807–826.10.1080/03075070802706553
- Sadler, D. R. (2009b, November). Moderation, grading and calibration. Edited keynote address. Good Practices in Assessment Symposium. Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/211940/GPA-Symposium2009-Edited-Keynote-Address-FINAL.pdf
- Sadler, D. R. (2010). Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 727–743.
- Sadler, D. R. (2011, June). The role of academic teacher judgments in assuring achievement standards. St Anne’s College: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Invited Research Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.oucea.education.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/.../Sadler-FINAL.pdf