Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: an effective combination for student evaluation?

References

• Abdullah, M. M. B., & Islam, R. (2011). Nominal group technique & its applications in managing quality in higher education. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 5, 81–99.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R. L. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 463–475.10.1080/03098260600927575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Collecting & using student feedback. A guide to good practice. Learning & Teaching Support Network. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/tla/collecting_and_using_student_feedback.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. (2007). Hearing the student voice: Enhancing academic professional development through the involvement of students. Educational Developments, 8, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, M., & Murphy, R. (1996). The Nominal Group Technique: Extending the evaluation of students’ teaching & learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K., Shewchuk, R. M., Qu, H., Staton, L. J., Bigby, J. A., Houston, T. K., & Allison, J. (2011). What should we include in a cultural competence curriculum? An emerging formative evaluation process to foster curriculum development. Academic Medicine, 86, 333–341. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182087314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group & Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, P., & Abbott, C. (2003). Using focus groups to supplement the assessment of technical communication texts, programs, and courses. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, 25–45.10.1207/s15427625tcq1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Kristofco, R., Shewchuk, R., Casebeer, L., Bellande, B., & Bennett, N. (2005). Attributes of an ideal continuing medical education institution identified through nominal group technique. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 25, 221–228.10.1002/(ISSN)1554-558X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, G., Fowell, S., & Bligh, J. (1999). The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in medical undergraduate education. Medical Education, 33, 8–13. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00288.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax, P., & McLeman, P. (1984). The uses and abuses of nominal group technique in polytechnic course evaluation. Studies in Higher Education, 9, 183–190.10.1080/03075078412331378834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, O. T. (2011). A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 21–28.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestel, D., Ivkovic, A., Hill, R. A., Warrens, A. N., Paraskevas, P. A., McDonnell, J. A., & Browne, C. (2012). Benefits & challenges of focus groups in the evaluation of a new graduate entry medical programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, M. J., & Jackson, L. (1983). Nominal group technique: A process for initiating curriculum development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 8, 129–138.10.1080/03075078312331378994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus group method & methodology: Current practice & recent debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29, 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. (2013). Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups & nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36, 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E., & Weitzer, W. H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students & survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004, 63–73.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-075X
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 387–415.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: An exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 995–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga-Atkins, T., & McIsaac, J. (2011a). Using the Nominal Group Technique with clickers to research student experiences of e-learning: A project report. Written for the ELESIG Small Grants Scheme. Liverpool: University of Liverpool. Retrieved from http://slidesha.re/1iHXXgG
   Google Scholar
• Varga-Atkins, T., & McIsaac, J. (2011b, October). The Nominal Group Technique: A practical guide for facilitators. Written for the ELESIG Small Grants Scheme. Liverpool: University of Liverpool. Version 1.0. Retrieved from slideshare.net: http://slidesha.re/1qFZ7cH
   Google Scholar
• Watt, S., Simpson, C., McKillop, C., & Nunn, V. (2002). Electronic course surveys: Does automating feedback & reporting give better results? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., White, N., Klem, R., Wilson, S., & Bartholomew, P. (2006). Clinical education & training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality & capacity. Radiography, 12, 215–224.10.1016/j.radi.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, V. (1997). Focus Groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal, 23, 209–224.10.1080/0141192970230207
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (2009). ‘Student experience’ surveys: Some methodological considerations & an empirical investigation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 721–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar