‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing

References

• Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (2014). Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in theory and practice and theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., Kamler, B., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2010). Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison, C., & Paré, A. (2012). Writing as craft and practice in the doctoral curriculum. In A. Lee & R. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies (pp. 12–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2011). New academics as supervisors: A steep learning curve with challenges, tensions and pleasures. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 37–55). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, D. Figueiredo, & A. Bonini (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 279–294). West Lafayette: The WAC Clearninghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buissink-Smith, N., Hart, S., & van der Meer, J. (2013). ‘There are other people out there!’ Successful postgraduate peer groups and research communities at a New Zealand university. Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 695–705. 10.1080/07294360.2013.777034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2007). Assessment and emotion: The impact of being assessed. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education. Learning for the longer term (pp. 144–156). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E. (2009). Advocating apprenticeship and intellectual community. In R. G. Ehrenberg & C. V. Kuh (Eds.), Doctoral education and the faculty of the future (pp. 53–64). New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., Marshall, N., & Leonardo, L. (2012). The impact of research training and research codes of practice on submission of doctoral degrees: An exploratory cohort study. Higher Education Quarterly, 66, 47–64. 10.1111/hequ.2012.66.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Pergamon Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jazvac-Martek, M., Chen, S., & McAlpine, L. (2011). Tracking the doctoral student experience over time: Cultivating agency in diverse spaces. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 17–36). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. F. (2011). Publishing from your PhD: Negotiating a crowded jungle. Farnham: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. (1997). Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners reports on doctoral theses. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 333–347. 10.1080/03075079712331380936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 461–470. 10.1080/13562510701415433
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011). To be or not to be? The challenges of learning academic work. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. (2013). Writing for academic journals (3rd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2007). Defining the doctorate. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/435/1/RedefiningTheDoctorate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of ‘good’ supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2014). Realising graduate attributes in the research degree: The role of peer support groups. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 616–629. 10.1080/13562517.2014.901955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sword, H. (2009). Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 319–336. 10.1080/03075070802597101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). ‘Tell me what to do’ vs. ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 101–112. 10.1177/1469787411402438
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Woodward-Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, 253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297. 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar