Doctoral writing advisors navigating the supervision terrain

References

• Aitchison, C., & Paré, A. (2012). Writing as craft and practice in the doctoral curriculum. In A. Lee & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedagogies (pp. 12–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). Learning supervision: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 331–342.10.1080/14703290903068805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Council of Graduate Researchers. (2010). Best practice guidelines: Research doctorates. Retrieved from https://staff.mq.edu.au/public/download.jsp?id=50751
   Google Scholar
• Babione, C. (2014). Developing a concept of practitioner teacher inquiry. In Practitioner teacher inquiry and research. San Francisco, CA: Wiley &Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2005). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, E., & Albertyn, R. (2011). Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory processes. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25, 875–888.
   Google Scholar
• Bold, C. (2012). Using narrative in research. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446288160
   Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. (2014). Before the dissertation. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.7111486
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 413–425.10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, J. (2016). More than language: Graduate student writing as ‘disciplinary becoming. In S. Simpson, N. Caplan, M. Cox, & T. Phillips (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum and program design (pp. 78–96). Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 233–252.10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. (2003). Mapping the pleasures and risks of Supervision. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24, 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2015). They are the bosses: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39, 320–335.10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., Kerr, H., & Green, I. (2015). Supervision pedagogies: Narratives from the field. Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 107–118.10.1080/13562517.2014.957271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 557–570.10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Bansel, P. (2012). The learning alliance: Ethics in doctoral supervision. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 377–392.10.1080/03054985.2012.706219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 79–92.10.1080/03075070902906798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lahenius, K., & Ikävalko, H. (2012). Joint supervision practices in doctoral education – A student experience. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing for the doctorate and beyond. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 87–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 558–570.10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors. Australian Universities Review, 54, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., & Sunderland, J. (2016). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Published online. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pare, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2011). Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral student writing: Shaping rhetorical subjects. In D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Pare, N. Artemeva, M. Horne, & L. Yousoubova (Eds.), Writing in knowledge societies (pp. 215–236). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Philips, E. M., & Pugh, D. (2005). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (4th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, C. (1998). Joint supervision and the PhD: Safety net or panacea? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 256–271.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2017). Team modes and power: Supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research and Development, 36, 358–371.10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., Zawacki, T., & Baker, S. (2016). Uncovering challenges and pedagogical complications in dissertation writing and supervisory practices: A multi-method study of doctoral student advisors. In S. Simpson, N. Caplan, M. Cox, & T. Phillips (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, and program design (pp. 52–77). Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., Sun, K. Y., & El-Bezre, N. (2014). Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward- Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research and Development, 26, 253–268.10.1080/07294360701494286
   Google Scholar