870
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Penumbra: Doctoral support as drama: From the ‘lightside’ to the ‘darkside’. From front of house to trapdoors and recesses

, &

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2015). Doctoral writing markets: Exploring the grey zone. Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 1–12). Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Bengtsen, S. S. E. (2016a). Doctoral supervision: Organization and dialogue. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  • Bengtsen, S. S. E. (2016b). An exploration of darkness within doctoral education. Creative learning approaches of doctoral students. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 260–282). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Bengtsen, S. S. E., & Barnett, R. (2017, February). Confronting the dark side of higher education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51, 114–131. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12190
  • Berghegger, S. (2009). Life as art as life: Dramaturgy as psychology. Inquiries Journal, 1, 1.
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Brummett, B. (2010). Techniques of close reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (Eds.). (2014). Developing generic support for doctoral students: Practice and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
  • Elliot, D. L., Reid, K., & Baumfield, V. (2015). Beyond the amusement, puzzlement and challenges: An enquiry into international students’ academic acculturation. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 2198–2217. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1029903
  • Elliot, D. L., Baumfield, V., Reid, K., & Makara, K. A. (2016). Hidden treasures: Successful international doctoral students who found and harnessed the hidden curriculum. Oxford Review of Education, 42, 733–748. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1229664
  • Fitzpatrick, E., Mullen, M., & O’Connor, P. (2015). Creating CRUAT: Disrupting supervision and research through collaborative performance. Drama Australia Journal, 39, 31–44.
  • Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life (pp. 27–28). New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Grant, B. (2001). Dirty work: ‘A code for supervision’ read against the grain. In A. Bartlett, & G. Mercer (Eds.), Postgraduate research supervision. Transforming (R) elations (pp. 13–23). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Grant, B. M. (2008). Agonistic struggle: Master slave dialogues in humanities supervision. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 9–27.10.1177/1474022207084880
  • Harre, R., & Moghaddam, F. (Eds.). (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. London: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412986120
  • Hopwood, N., Alexander, P., Harris-Huemmert, S., McAlpine, L., & Wagstaff, S. (2011). The hidden realities of life as a doctoral student. In V. Kumar, & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 213–233). Serdang: UniversitiPutra Malaysia Press.
  • Jazvac-Martek, M., Chen, S., & McAlpine, L. (2011). Tracking the doctoral student experience over time: Cultivating agency in diverse spaces. In L. McAlpine, & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Researched-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (p. 25). Berlin: Springer Publishing.
  • Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431–441.10.1080/07294360903067930
  • Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  • Lingis, A. (1998). The imperative. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Press.
  • Lingis, A. (2007). The first person singular. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Manathunga, C. (2007). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Ethnographic journeys of identity and power. In D. Palfreyman, & D. L. McBride (Eds.), Learning and teaching across cultures in higher education (pp. 93, 113). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590427
  • Manathunga, C. (2014). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Reimagining time, place and knowledge. London: Routledge.
  • Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309. doi:10.1023/A:1014699605875
  • McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision – The most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35, 265–280.10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
  • McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: A learning perspective. Higher Education Research and Development, 25, 3–17.10.1080/07294360500453012
  • McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Qualitative Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412986229
  • Morris, C., & Wisker, G. (2011). Troublesome encounters: Strategies for managing the wellbeing of master’s and doctoral education students during their learning processes. HEA ESCalate subject centre report. Retrieved from https://escalate.ac.uk/6828
  • Parker, I. (2005). Psychology: Introducing radical research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Turunen, T. (2012). From the countdown to an intermediate stopping point. In K. Määttä (Ed.), Obsessed with the doctoral theses: Supervision and support during the dissertation process (pp. 69–76). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-678-6
  • Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2013). Experiences of disengagement – A study of doctoral students in the Behavioral Sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 61–81.
  • Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-02423-7
  • Wisker, G. (2014). Managing the writing energy. DoctoralWriting SIG. Retrieved from http://doctoralwriting.wordpress.com/author/doc
  • Wisker, G., & Robinson, G. (2009). Encouraging postgraduate students of literature and art to cross conceptual thresholds. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 317–330.10.1080/14703290903069035
  • Wisker, G., & Robinson, G. (2012). Picking up the pieces: Supervisors and doctoral ‘orphans’. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3, 39–153.
  • Wisker, G., & Savin-Baden, M. (2009). Priceless conceptual thresholds: Beyond the ‘stuck place’ in writing. London Research Education, 7, 235–247.10.1080/14748460903290207

Website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.