References
- Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 265–278.10.1080/13562510600680574
- Aitchison, C., Catterall, J., Ross, P., & Burgin, S. (2012). Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 435–447.10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
- Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2015). Researching feedback dialogue. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 252–265.
- Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 432–445.10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
- Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 857–872.10.1080/03075070902898664
- Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2013). Writing scientific research articles. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Carless, D., & Chan, K. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 930–941.10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246
- Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.). (2009). Language, knowledge and pedagogy. London: Continuum.
- Department of Education and Training. (2015). Report of the review of research policy and funding arrangements. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/20151203_main_report1.pdf
- Devrim, D. (2014). Theorizing written feedback as a mediation tool within the Sydney School’s genre pedagogy. Functional Linguistics, 2, 1–13.
- Dreyfus, S. J., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. R. (2015). Genre pedagogy in higher education. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Drury, H., & Mort, P. (2015). Engaging students in online learning environments for success in academic writing. In M. Deane, & T. Guasch (Eds.), Learning and teaching writing online (pp. 151–175). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004290846
- Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research., 83, 70–120.10.3102/0034654312474350
- Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Lamming, M., Padmanabhan, M., & James, B. (2017). Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities. Journal of Academic Language and Learning., 11, A88–A103.
- Hendry, G., White, P., & Herbert, C. (2016). Providing exemplar-based ‘feedforward’ before an assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17, 99–109.10.1177/1469787416637479
- Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14, 1–19.
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 461–470.10.1080/13562510701415433
- Long, M. H. (Ed.). (2005). Second language needs analysis (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: C.U.P.
- Marginson, S. (2007). Global setting, national policy and higher education in 2007.In Education, science and the future of Australia: A public seminar series on policy (pp. 1–13). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
- Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.59
- McWilliam, E., Sanderson, D., Evans, T., Lawson, A., & Taylor, P. G. (2006). The risky business of doctoral management. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26, 209–221.10.1080/02188790600937375
- Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn. London: Equinox.
- Smith, C., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 44–60.10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112448/MPU-L1SN.png"})