Career professionals entering doctoral study: Advantages and challenges

References

• Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework. Retrieved https://www.aqf.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, S., Hattie, J., & Anderson, L. (2004). Predicting examiner recommendations on Ph.D. theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 178–194.10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, M. J., & Hill, M. (1991). Doctoral dissertations as liminal journeys of the self: Betwixt and between in graduate sociology programs. Teaching Sociology, 19, 322–332.10.2307/1318198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2014). Initiatives to enhance the professional development of research students. Retrieved from Canberra: https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/initiatives-enhance-professional-development-research-students
   Google Scholar
• DIISR. (2011). Research skills for an innovative future: A research workforce strategy to cover the decade to 2020 and beyond. Retrieved from Canberra: http://www.industry.gov.au/research/ResearchWorkforceIssues/Pages/Library%20Card/researchskillsforaninnovativefuture.aspx
   Google Scholar
• DIISR. (2012). Higher education statistics publications. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/HigherEducationStatistics/StatisticsPublications/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Franken, M. (2012). Re-situation challenges for international students ‘becoming’ researchers. Higher Education, 64, 845–859.10.1007/s10734-012-9532-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 326–350.10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, D. S, & McGowan, E. M. (2014, April). Doctoral students becoming researchers: A study of an innovative literature review process. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Group of Eight. (2014). Policy note: Changes in international students from 2003 to 2013. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, C. M., & Goldberg, A. D. (2005). Doctoral student persistence in counselor education programs: Student-program match. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 175–188.10.1002/ceas.2005.44.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., & Simpson, B. (2012). Writes of passage: Writing up qualitative data as a threshold concept in doctoral research. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 735–746.10.1080/13562517.2012.678328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, B. (2013). Researching student becoming in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 109–121.10.1080/07294360.2012.751089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2007, August). Conceptual thresholds for research candidates. (EARLI, Trans.). 12th European conference for research on learning and instruction: Developing potentials for learning, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 293–304.10.1080/14703290903069001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2010, July). Creativity in research education: Is it a threshold concept or just a good thing? Paper presented at the 3rd Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2015). ‘I didn’t have a clue what they were talking about’: PhD candidates and theory. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 52–63. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.981835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2004). Examining the examiners: How inexperienced examiners approach the assessment of research theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 121–135.10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2006). Opening the black box: How examiners assess your thesis. In C. Denholm & T. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and New Zealand (2nd ed.). (pp. 200–207). Melbourne: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development, 28, 431–441.10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2010). Learning to be a researcher: The concepts and rossings. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.). Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 399–414). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Klomparens, K., Beck, J., Brockman, J., & Nunez, A. (2008). Setting expectations and resolving conflicts in graduate education. Washington, DC: The Council of Graduate Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R. (2008, June). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Paper presented at the Threshold concepts: From theory to practice, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Mantai, L. (2015). Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 636–650. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F, & Land, R. (2002, September). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the discipline. Paper presented at the ISL, Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (Eds.). (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M., & Laugksch, R. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–244.10.1080/00313830500109535
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M., & Laugksch, R. (2007). Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 415–433.10.1080/00313830701485627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2012). Graduate longitudinal study New Zealand: Selected findings for doctoral students. New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from https://www.glsnz.org.nz/files/1449434460603.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 369–386.10.1080/0307507022000011507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettles, M., & Millett, C. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to PhD. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NZQA. (2008). Doctor of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhalto, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Education, 12, 1–12. doi:10.5402/2012/934941
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. (1992). Achieving a PhD: Ten students’ experiences. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203415740
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 305–316.10.1080/14703290903069027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1979). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In W. Less, & E. Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion (pp. 234–243). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & Kiley, M. (2017). Helping students demonstrate mastery of doctoral Threshold Concepts. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 173–177). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar