Examining participation and engagement in a microblogging-supported college-level hybrid course

References

• Agherdien, N. (2011, July). Twitter and Edulink: Balancing passive consumption with knowledge creation. In P. Balcaen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on e-Learning (pp. 489–492). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Antenos-Conforti, E. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social networking in intermediate Italian classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 59–90). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 129–155.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education – A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elavsky, C. M., Mislan, C., & Elavsky, S. (2011). When talking less is more: Exploring outcomes of Twitter usage in the large-lecture hall. Learning, Media and Technology, 36, 215–233. doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.549828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 783–801.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. L., Schneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (Dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43, 555–575.10.1023/A:1020114231387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Bittanti, M., Horst, A., Horst, H., Pascoe, C. J., Robinson, L., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007, August). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on web mining and social network analysis, WebKDD/SNA-KDD’07 (pp. 56–65). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2014). Engaging students through social media: Evidence-based practices for use in student affairs. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting Twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 273–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 9–21. doi:10.1177/1469787411429190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, G. (2013).10 awesome Twitter analytics and visualization tools. Retrieved from http://Twittertoolsbook.com/10-awesome-Twitter-analytics-visualization-tools/
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706.10.1353/csd.0.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. R. (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewInternet.com/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Teens_Kindness_Cruelty_SNS_Report_Nov_2011_FINAL_110711.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lin, M. F. G., Hoffman, E. S., & Borengasser, C. (2013). Is social media too social for class? A case study of Twitter use. TechTrends, 57, 39–45.10.1007/s11528-013-0644-2
   Google Scholar
• Luo, T. (2015). Instructional guidance in microblogging-supported learning: Insights from a multiple case study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27, 173–194.10.1007/s12528-015-9097-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T. (2016). Enabling microblogging-based peer feedback in face-to-face classrooms. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 156–166.10.1080/14703297.2014.995202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging-based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11, 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• McFedries, P. (2007). Technically speaking: All a-Twitter. IEEE Spectrum, 44, 84.10.1109/MSPEC.2007.4337670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010, February). Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 189–192). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of education statistics 2014. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Pauschenwein, J., & Sfiri, A. (2010). Adult learner’s motivation for the use of microblogging during online training courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5, 22–25. doi:10.3991/ijet.v5i1.1041
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 243–265.10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., Zickuhr, K., Purcell, K., Madden, M., & Brenner, J. (2012). The rise of e-reading. Pew research center’s internet & American life project. Retrieved from http://libraries.pewinternet.org/files/legacy-pdf/The%20rise%20of%20e-reading%204.5.12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C., & Welsh, A. (2011). Enabled backchannel: Conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of Documentation, 67, 214–237. doi:10.1108/00220411111109449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Brenner, J. (2012). Twitter Use 2012. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/05/31/twitter-use-2012/
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (2016). Twitter Usage/Company Facts. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/company
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2009, November 27). Teaching with Twitter: Not for the faint of heart. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(A1), A10–A11.
   Google Scholar