Twitter adoption, students’ perceptions, Big Five personality traits and learning outcome: Lessons learned from 3 case studies

References

• Altanopoulou, P., & Tselios, N. (2015, November). How does personality affect wiki-mediated learning? In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interactive Mobile and Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), Thessaloniki, Greece (pp. 16–18). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Altanopoulou, P., Tselios, N., Katsanos, C., Georgoutsou, M., & Panagiotaki, A. (2015). Wiki-mediated activities in higher education: Evidence-based analysis of learning effectiveness across three studies. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 511–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006). The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 129–144.10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003a). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 237–250.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003b). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Chen, T.-L. (2012). Use of Twitter for formative evaluation: Reflections on trainer and trainees’ experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, E49–E52.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – Opportunities. Challenges and tensions. Nottingham: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA), University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Domizi, D. P. (2013). Microblogging to foster connections and community in a weekly graduate seminar course. TechTrends, 57, 43–51.10.1007/s11528-012-0630-0
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 783–801.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Hattem, D. (2012). The practice of microblogging. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 1, 38–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38, 369–381.10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 273–287.10.1111/bjet.2013.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsanos, C., Tselios, N., & Avouris, N. (2008, April). AutoCardSorter: Designing the information architecture of a web site using latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. CHI 2008 {Vol1. ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1} (pp. 875–878). Florence: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., Mills, L. A., & Wakefield, J. S. (2012, November). Measuring student attitudes toward learning with social media: Validation of the Social Media Learning scale. In Proceedings of the annual convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 127–134).
   Google Scholar
• Kotsiantis, S., Tselios, N., Filippidi, A., & Komis, V. (2013). Using learning analytics to identify successful learners in a blended learning course. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5, 133–150.10.1504/IJTEL.2013.059088
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706.10.1353/csd.0.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L. A., Knezek, G. A., & Wakefield, J. S. (2013, February). Learning with social media: Measurement tools for understanding information behavior in technology pervasive environments of the 21st century. Paper presented at iConference, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M., & Paunonen, S. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.10.1037/a0014996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2013, December). Using Twitter in higher education. In H. Carter, M. Gosper, and J. Hedberg (Eds.), Electric dreams: Proceedings of the 30th Αscilite Conference (pp. 694–705). Sydney: Macquarie University, Αscilite.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, J. R., Williams, R., Shogan, C., & Glassman, M. (2014, August). Social media as a communication tool in Congress: Evaluating Senate usage of Twitter in the 113th Congress. In APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tiernan, P. (2013). A study of the use of Twitter by students for lecture engagement and discussion. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 673–690.
   Google Scholar
• Tselios, N., & Avouris, N. M. (2003). Cognitive task modeling for system design and evaluation of non-routine task domains. In E. Hollnagel’s (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 307–332). New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. S., Warren, S. J., & Alsobrook, M. (2011). Learning and teaching as communicative actions: A mixed-methods Twitter study. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 3, 563–584.
   Google Scholar