A framework for the development of educational video: An empirical approach

References

• Ali, N. M., Lee, H., & Smeaton, A. F. (2011). Use of content analysis tools for visual interaction design. In H. B. Zaman, P. Robinson, M. Petrou, P. Olivier, T. K. Shih, S. Velastin, & I. Nyström (Eds.), Visual informatics: Sustaining research and innovations (pp. 74–84). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arreola, R. A. (1998). Writing learning objectives. A teaching resource document from the office of the vice chancellor for planning and academic support. Retrieved from http://nexus.hs-bremerhaven.de/Library.nsf/0946dbe6a3c341e8c12570860044165f/3582b289612f6232c12573a2005aa4d8/$FILE/Learning_Objectives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beale, R., & Sharples, M. (2002). Design guide for developers of educational software. London: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta).
   Google Scholar
• Brame, C. (2016). Effective educational videos. ACT teaching guides, Center for Teaching. Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/effective-educational-videos/
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, E., Amante, B., Simo, P., Enache, M., & Fernandez, V. (2011, April). Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation. In Proceedings global engineering education conference (EDUCON), 2011 IEEE (pp. 638–642). Amman, Jordan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1963). The process of education. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.10.1002/9781118255971
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cruse, E. (2007). Using educational video in the classroom: Theory, research and practice. Wynnewood, PA: Library Video Company. Retrieved from http://www.libraryvideo.com/articles/article26.asp
   Google Scholar
• Denning, D. (1992). Video in theory and practice: Issues for classroom use and teacher video evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.ebiomedia.com/downloads/VidPM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• EURICON. (2008). Evaluation and utilization criteria of educational material. Greek Teacher Training Agency (OEPEK). Retrieved from http://repository.edulll.gr/edulll/retrieve/3460/1024.pdf (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• Forest, E. (2014). The ADDIE model: Instructional design, educational technology. Retrieved from http://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P., Kim, J., & Robin, R. (2014, April). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (L@S 2014). Retrieved from http://groups.csail.mit.edu/uid/other-pubs/las2014-pguo-engagement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. (2015). Assessing experiences with online educational videos: Converting multiple constructed responses to quantifiable data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16, 168–192. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1998/3205
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. Cork: University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Petrovic, T., & Keppell, M. (1998, December). The development of multimedia evaluation criteria and a program of evaluation for computer aided learning. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE, 98), Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Koumi, J. (2006). Designing video and multimedia for open and flexible learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., & Boling, E. (1999). Screen design guidelines for motivation in interactive multimedia instruction: A survey and framework for designers. Educational technology, 39, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19, 265–291.10.2307/249596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, W. C. (2012). Using short videos in teaching a social science subject: Values and challenges. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2, 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164603
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177–213.
   Google Scholar
• Meseguer-Martinez, A., Ros-Galvez, A., & Rosa-Garcia, A. (2017). Satisfaction with online teaching videos: A quantitative approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 62–67.10.1080/14703297.2016.1143859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussiades, L., Kazanidis, I., & Iliopoulou, A. (2016). Developing effective educational videos for blended learning. Proceedings of the 1st International association for blended learning conference (IABL2016), Kavala, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Munassar, N. M. A., & Govardhan, A. (2010). A comparison between five models of software engineering. IJCSI, 5, 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Odle, T., & Mayer, R. (2009). Experimental research. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/experimental-research
   Google Scholar
• Overbaugh, R. C. (1994). Research-based guidelines for computer-based instruction development. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 29–47.10.1080/08886504.1994.10782114
   Google Scholar
• Peck, K. L., & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). The design, development & evaluation of instructional software. Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. O. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 31–61.10.1007/s12528-009-9011-x
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2003). Experimental research methods. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). (pp. 1021–1043). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. In R. Goldman, S. Derry, R. Pea, & B. Barron (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 335–348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simo, P., Fernandez, V., Algaba, I., Salan, N., Enache, M., Albareda-Sambola, M., & Rajadell, M. (2010). Video stream and teaching channels: Quantitative analysis of the use of low-cost educational videos on the web. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2937–2941.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.444
   Google Scholar
• Smaldino, S., Lowther, D., & Russel, J. (2012). Instructional technology and media for learning (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Whatley, J., & Ahmad, A. (2007). Using video to record summary lectures to aid students’ revision. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Zavlanos, M. (1998). Didactics (2nd ed.). Athens, Greece: Hellin Publications (in Greek).
   Google Scholar