Using differentiated feedback to improve performance in introductory statistics

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–68.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no-feedback, task-related comments and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. (2007). ‘Feedforward’: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• Florack, A., & Scarbis, M. (2006). How advertising claims affect brand preferences and category-brands associations: The role of regulatory fit. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 741–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/Failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A., & Paoloni, P. (2015). Perceived autonomy-support, expectancy, value, metacognitive strategies and performance in chemistry: A structural equation model in undergraduates. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 640–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 543–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzebowski, A., Palermo, J., & van de Berg, R. (2012). When feedback is not enough: The impact of regulatory fit on motivation after positive feedback. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7, 14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, A. E., Rivers, S. E., Rench, T. A., Katulak, N. A., Hicks, A., Hodorowski, J. K., … Salovey, P. (2008). A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 826–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malachowski, C. C., Martin, M. M., & Vallade, J. I. (2013). An examination of students’ adaptation, aggression, and apprehension traits with their instructional feedback orientations. Communication Education, 62, 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., Smailes, J., Sambell, K., Sambell, A., & Wakelin, D. (2008). Evaluating assessment strategies through collaborative evidence-based practice: Can one tool fit all? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, G., Crimmins, G., & Oprescu, F. (2016). If first-year students are afraid of public speaking assessments what can teachers do to alleviate such anxiety? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 586–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 34–49). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2014). Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. Language Learning, 64, 495–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B., Francis, B., & Robson, J. (2005). Gender, ‘bias’, assessment and feedback: Analysing the written assessment of undergraduate student essays. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, T., & Lam, S. (2011). Are success and failure experiences equally motivational? An investigation of regulatory focus and feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 724–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology, 53, 113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self-regulation and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkel, S. (2013). Combining the formative with the summative: The development of a two-stage online test to encourage engagement and provide personal feedback in large classes. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 2026–2041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar