Assessing individual contribution in collaborative learning through self- and peer-assessment in the context of China

References

• Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fermelis, J., Tucker, R., & Palmer, S. (2007, December). Online self and peer assessment in large, multi-campus, multi-cohort contexts. Paper presented at the Ascilite 2007: ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Singapore. Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30008127
   Google Scholar
• Fermelis, J., Tucker, R., & Palmer, S. (2008, October - November). Self and peer assessment: Development of an online tool for team assignments in business communication and architecture. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention. Association for Business Communication. Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252016429_Self_and_Peer_Assessment_Development_of_an_online_tool_for_team_assignments_in_business_communication_and_architecture
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. L. (2004). Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L., & Miles, L. (2004). Assessing contributions to group assignments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 751–768. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131516300240
   Google Scholar
• Kilic, D. (2016). An examination of using self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in higher education: A case study in teacher education. Higher Education Studies, 6, 136–144.
   Google Scholar
• Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2017). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. (2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 309–323.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 803–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417–444. 10.1080/02602930500099219
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258183246_Cooperative_Learning
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1998). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-and co-assessment. Learning Environments Research, 1, 293–319. 10.1023/A:1009932704458
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2010). Flexible peer assessment formats to acknowledge individual contributions during (web-based) collaborative learning. In B. Ertl (Ed.), E-collaborative knowledge construction: Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments (pp. 139–161). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-729-9.ch008
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4, 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers and Education, 42, 403–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M., Segers, M. S., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Fostering interactivity through formative peer assessment in (web-based) collaborative learning environments. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 375–395). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55–87). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witney, D., & Smallbone, T. (2011). Wiki work: Can using wikis enhance student collaboration for group assignment tasks? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., Zheng, Y., Hu, H., & Li, Y. (2016). Exploring individual contributions during online collaborative discussions. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 395–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar