Evaluation of a blended learning approach for cross-cultural entrepreneurial education

References

• Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290–305.
   Google Scholar
• Caddick, S. (2008). Back to Bologna. The Long Road to European Higher Education Reform. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 18–21. Retrieved from http://www.embopress.org/content/9/1/18
   Google Scholar
• Carr-Chellman, A., Dyer, D., & Breman, J. (2000). Burrowing through the network wires: Does distance detract from collaborative authentic learning? Journal of Distance Education, 15, 39–62. Retrieved from http://cade.icaap.org/vol15.1/carr.html
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. T., & Lim, J. (2002). Cross-cultural communication and social presence in asynchronous learning processes. E-Service Journal, 1, 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Clasen, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Linkert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35, 31–35. Retrieved from http://pubs.aged.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol35/35-04-31.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Czaja, R., & Blair, J. (1995). Designing surveys – A guide to decisions and procedures (pp.269). Thousands Oaks, CA, London: Pine Forge Press – A Sage publication company..
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N., Eickelmann, B., & Zaka, P. (2013). Restructuring of educational systems in the digital age from a co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 438–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Tavers, N. J. (2013). From moodle to facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. The Electornic Journal of Communication, 16. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/016/1/01611.HTML
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 80 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge International Trends in Higher Education University of Oxford International Strategy Office. Retrieved from https://www.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/International%20Trends%20in%20Higher%20Education%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Trends in Higher Education. (2015). University of oxford international strategy office. Retrieved from https://www.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/International%20Trends%20in%20Higher%20Education%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. (1990). Principal component analysis: A beginner’s guide I. Introduction and application. Weather, 45, 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Aazami, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). Fostering students’ competence in identifying business opportunities in entrepreneurship education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, D., & McDougal, D. (1999). Collaborative learning on the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 245.
   Google Scholar
• Kyong-Jee, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of online collaboration. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 8. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00163.x/full/
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating student’s perceived satisfaction, behavioural intention and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, A. A. M., Owens, S. M., Soo, M., Le Coze, S. S. C. L., MacIntyre, A., & Eastwood, C. (2018). Comparison of high-technology active learning and low-technology active learning classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 105–118. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Syynimaa, K., Isomäki, H., Kohornen, J., & Niemi, M. (2010, May). Cross-cultural distance learning in Finnish-Russian higher education – experiences from a pilot course. In Z. Abas, I. Jung, & J. Luca Eds., Proceedings of global learn 2010 (pp. 3982–3990). Penang, Malaysia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• ter Braak, C. J. F., & Šmilauer, P. (2002). Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide. Wageningen and České Budĕjovice: Biometris.
   Google Scholar
• Vercellotti, M. L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Synchronous online learning experiences: The perspectives of international students from Taiwan. Educational Media International, 44, 339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Yu, H., Chen, S.-J., & Huang, R. (2014). Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 208–221. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_3/ets_17_3.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 120–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar