Investigating academic major differences in perception of computer self-efficacy and intention toward e-learning adoption in China

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., & Kibelloh, M. (2013). Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49, 111–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59, 776–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, G.-L., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Exploring the structure of science self-efficacy: A model built on high school students’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 21, 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Y., He, Q., Feng, W., Li, D., & Fu, Z. (2010). A study on e-learning take-up intention from an innovation adoption perspective: A case in China. Computers & Education, 55, 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self‐efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6, JCMC611.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2017). A collaborative autoethnography study to inform the teaching of reflective practice in STEM. Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M.-H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38, 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P. J.-H., Clark, T. H., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41, 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibelloh, M., & Bao, Y. (2014a). Can online MBA programmes allow professional working mothers to balance work, family, and career progression? A case study in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibelloh, M., & Bao, Y. (2014b). Perceptions of international female students toward e-learning in resolving high education and family role strain. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50, 467–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2002). The effects of technology-based activities on science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) major choices. Retrieved from http://asq.org/edu/2012/06/best-practices/the-effects-of-technology-based-activities-on-stem-major-choices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Wang, X. (2015). Expansion and differentiation in Chinese higher education. International Higher Education, 60. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/download/8503/7637
   Google Scholar
• Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8, 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40, 343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder, M. S., Chiong, R., Bao, Y., & Hayat Malik, B. 2018. Acceptance and use predictors of fitness wearable technology and intention to recommend: An empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2018-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57, 2432–2440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong, J. Y., Hong, W., & Tam, K.-Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019). Investigating factors affecting learner’s perception toward online learning: Evidencefrom ClassStart Application in Thailand. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1581259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongsri, N., Shen, L., Bao, Y., & Alharbi, I. M. (2018). Integrating UTAUT and UGT to explain behavioural intention to use M-learning: A developing country’s perspective. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20, 278–297.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, C. P., Dey, E. L., & Herrin, G. D. (2008). Is modeling of freshman engineering success different from modeling of non‐engineering success? Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 467–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, F. R., & Human-Vogel, S. (2016). Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 1298–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar