A return to Wonderland: Exploring the links between academic identity development and creativity during doctoral education

References

• Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 807–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, G. (2018). Train PhD students to be thinkers not just specialists. Nature, 554, 277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M. (2015). Conditions for criticality in doctoral education: A creative concern. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 265–282). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M. (2016). Critical and creative thinking nexus: Learning experiences of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 971–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M. (2018). The stifling silence around scholarly creativity in doctoral education: Experiences of students and supervisors in four disciplines. Higher Education, 75, 655–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M., & Avery, H. (2014). Conditions for scholarly creativity in interdisciplinary doctoral education through an Aristotelean lens. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary research handbook (pp. 291–312). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M., & Frick, B. L. (2011). Conceptualising and encouraging critical creativity in doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2, 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M., & Frick, B. L. (2018). The SISA matrix for feedback fostering doctoral students’ creativity. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Giving feedback on research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 210–218). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. (1865). Alice in Wonderland. London: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis and educational change. In R. Wodak & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 217–227). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L. (2008). Professional identity development theory and doctoral education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 113, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fenge, L. A. (2012). Enhancing the doctoral journey: The role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, B. L. (2010). Creativity in doctoral education: Conceptualising the original contribution. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. W. Holtham (Eds.), Teaching creativity – Creativity in teaching (pp. 15–32). Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, B. L. (2012). Pedagogies for creativity in science doctorates. In A. Lee & S. Danby (Eds.), Reshaping doctoral education: Programs, pedagogies, curriculum (pp. 113–127). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, B. L. (2018). The original contribution: Myth or reality in doctoral work?. In E. M. Bitzer, M. Fourie-Malherbe, B. L. Frick, & K. Pyhältö (Eds.), Spaces, journeys and new horizons for postgraduate supervision (pp. 273–286). Stellenbosch: SunMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, C. M., McGrath, C., Campbell, K. A., Götherström, C., Windebank, A. J., & Landazuri, N. (2017). Cutting edge: Promoting international collaboration and creativity in doctoral students. eLife, 6, e26787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jazvac‐Martek, M. (2009). Oscillating role identities: The academic experiences of education doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Cranton, P. (2005). From scholarship student to responsible scholar: A transformative process. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 447–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling Virginia: Stylus publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. (2012). Identity trajectories. Australian Universities Review, 54, 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience in education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1, 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvihill, T. M., & Swaminathan, R. (2012). Creativity and learning in the virtual sphere: Perspectives from doctoral students. Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., Evans, T., & Macauley, P. (2016). The diversity and complexity of settings and arrangements forming the ‘experienced environments’ for doctoral candidates: Some implications for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2110–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2005). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed., pp. 869–886). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. (2009). Artists, creativity and knowledge: A challenge for doctoral change. Research in Dance Education, 10, 219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Nummenmaa, A. R., Soini, T., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Research on scholarly communities and development of scholarly identity in Finnish doctoral education. In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.), Higher education research in Finland: Emerging structures and contemporary issues (pp. 337–357). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, S., Morton, J., & Choi, J. (2017). You can’t be Shakespearean talking about the institutionalisation of sex offenders: Creativity and creative practices of multilingual doctoral writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2017). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2015). Second language creative writers. Identities and writing processes. Bristol: Multilingual Matter.
   Google Scholar