Key variables for academic performance in university accounting studies. A mediation model

References

• Al-Twaijry, A. A. (2010). Student academic performance in undergraduate managerial-accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 3311–3322.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The effects of different learning environments on students’ motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interest in science. Science Education, 100, 364–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2012). Exploring individual differences as determining factors in student academic achievement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. V. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares. Concepts, methods and application (pp. 655–690). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, C. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski-Raimondo, D. A., McKeown, W., & Brooks, A. (2016). The field as our classroom: Applications in a business-related setting. Journal of Accounting Education, 34, 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, B. K., & Rhee, B. S. (2014). The influences of student engagement, institutional mission, and cooperative learning climate on the generic competency development of Korean undergraduate students. Higher Education, 67, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Robinson, C. (2018). Enhancing teaching excellence through team-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2007). Creeping passivity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Denson, N., Loveday, T., & Dalton, H. (2010). Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction?. Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagay, G., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2015). A strategy for incorporating students’ interests into the high-school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 949–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Forthcoming Industrial Management & Data Systems, 16, 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. (2014). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J. C., Heugh, S., Bax, C., & Branford-White, C. (2014). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagger, S. (2013). Affective learning and the classroom debate. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35, 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Berghmans, I., Dochy, F., & Bulckens, L. (2014). “Time is not enough”. Workload in higher education: A student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 648–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawanto, O., & Stewardson, G. (2013). Students’ interest and expectancy for success while engaged in analysis and creative design activities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., Liem, G. A. D., & Ortiga, Y. P. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: An intrinsic-extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 264–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. S., Queirós, C., Teixeira, P. M., & Menezes, I. (2011). Development and validation of a theoretically based, multidimensional questionnaire of students’ evaluation of university teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 843–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque, T., Barrio, S., Sánchez, J., Ibañez, J. A., & Doña, L. (2016). Estudio de opinión de los titulados de la Universidad de Granada. [Study of graduates of the University of Granada]. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, R. (2011). The effect of placement experience upon final-year results for surveying degree programmes. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 939–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariskind, C. (2013). ‘Always allowing the voice’: Expectations of student participation and the disciplining of teachers’ practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 596–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui, C., Broeckmans, J., Doumen, S., Groenen, A., & Molenberghs, G. (2014). Do diligent students perform better? Complex relations between student and course characteristics, study time, and academic performance in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 621–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, K., & Munro, N. (2018). Finance students’ experiences of lecture-based active learning tasks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (2014). Assessing the reliability of student evaluations of teaching: Choosing the right coefficient. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidis, Y., & Dimitriadis, S. G. (2014). On the student evaluation of university courses and faculty members’ teaching performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 238, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottewill, R. (2003). Pedagogic challenges facing business and management educators: Assessing the evidence. The International Journal of Management Education, 3, 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67, 783–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50, 58–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt, SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Student motivation and engagement. Schooling Issues Digest. Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Elez, M., Pardines, I., Garcia, P., Miñana, G., Roman, S., Sanchez, M., & Risco, J. L. (2014). Enhancing students’ learning process through self-generated tests. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & White, P. (2015). What makes a successful undergraduate? The relationship between student characteristics, degree subject and academic success at university. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 686–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D., & Christiaens, W. (2014). Assessing the validity and reliability of a quick scan for student’s evaluation of teaching. Results from confirmatory factor analysis and G Theory. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlhoaele, M., Hofman, A., Naidoo, A., & Winnips, K. (2014). Using clickers to facilitate interactive engagement activities in a lecture room for improved performance by students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlhoaele, M., Hofman, A., Winnips, K., & Beetsma, Y. (2014). The impact of interactive engagement methods on students’ academic achievement. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 1020–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyar, A., & Güngörmüş, A. H. (2011). Factors associated with student performance in financial accounting course. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 4, 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Voelkel, S., & Bennett, D. (2014). New uses for a familiar technology: Introducing mobile phone polling in large classes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 46–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahller, K. A. (2017). Truffle in paradise: Job costing for a small business. Journal of Accounting Education, 39, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research: Thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1311–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar