An integrated academic community of practice model (ACoPM)

References

• Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., & Keskin, H. (2007). Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new development projects. Techinnovation, 27, 628–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam, C. (2008). Creative activity and its impact on learner learning: Issues of implementation learning and teaching services. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Badran, I. (2007). Enhancing creativity and innovation in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 573–585.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bansia, R., & Reddy, K. (2015). Intellectual property from publicly financed research and intellectual property registration by universities: A case study of a university in South Africa. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 181, 185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Makinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities. In S. A. Barab & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 587–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedny, G. Z., & Seglin, M. H. (1999). Individual features of personality in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 546–563. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. E. (1948). Projective techniques: A dynamic approach to the study of personality. New York: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 16). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchamma, Y., & Michard, C. (2011). Communities of practice with teaching supervisors: A discussion of community members’ experience. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., & Dooley, L. (2005). Networked creativity: A structured management framework for stimulating innovation. Techninnovation, 25, 1388–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, S., & Giannakopoulos, P. (2013). Technology and tools supporting CoPs. In S. Buckley & M. Jakovljevic (Eds.), Knowledge management innovations for interdisciplinary education: Organizational applications (pp. 316–346). Philadelphia, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, S., & Jakovljevic, M. (2013). Knowledge management innovations for interdisciplinary education: Organizational applications. Philadelphia, PA: IGI Global Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 1, 380–400.
   Google Scholar
• Curzon, L. B. (1993). Teaching in further education: An outline of principles and practice (4th ed.). London: Cassel Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Dobre, R. (2005). Inovacije, technološke promjene i strategije. Šibenik, Croatia: Školska Knjiga.
   Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & Mcconnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice: Actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 853–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gola, G. (2008). Informal learning of facilitators’ perspectives of researching teaching practice. Methodological Horizons, 3, 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, L., & Lowe, A. (2018). Social learning. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopaedia of educational research, measurement and evaluation (pp. 1540–1541). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heher, A. D. (2006). Return on investment in innovation: Implications for institutions and national agencies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Highsmith, J. (2002). Agile software development ecosystems. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, S. S. (2010). Teaching creativity, creativity, content, and policy. Arts Education Policy Review, 111, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiu-Fen, L. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28, 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M. (2013a). A model of creativity, innovation and invention (MCII) for entrepreneurial engineers. In S. Buckley & M. Jakovljevic (Eds.), Knowledge management innovations for interdisciplinary education: Organizational applications (pp. 66–87). Philadelphia, PA: IGI Global Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M. (2014, September). Empowering knowledge exchange and innovation through the communities of practice model (CoPM) in the ODL environment. Proceedings of the ICDE Conference (pp. 186–198). Moscow, Russian Federation: Moscow state university of economics, statistics and informatics, Part I.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M. (2015, June). An Academic Community of Practice Model (ACoPM) for empowering breakthrough ideas in multidisciplinary environments. Proceedings of the 27th TheIIER International Conference, St. Petersburg, International institute of engineers and researchers. Kolkata, India, 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M. (2018). A model for innovation in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32, 109–131. Retrieved from http://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/34-143350640876-82.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M., Buckley, M., & Bushney, M. (2013b, June). Forming communities of practice in higher education: A theoretical perspective. Proceedings of the Make Learn International Conference Proceedings, Zadar, Croatia. Celje, Slovenia: ToKnowPress, 1107–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Jakovljevic, M., Radman Pesa, A., & Covo, P. (2012). Integrative organizational model of creativity and innovation (OMKI): Applicability to SME enterprises in RH. Ekonomska Misao I Praksa, 1, 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2009). The economics of intellectual property in South Africa. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubango, L. M., & Pouris, A. (2007). Industry work experience and innovation capacity of South African academic researchers. Technovation, 27, 788–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, M. (2011). RSS creativity, routines, systems, spontaneity. Retrieved from http://The99percent.com/Tips/6127/Rss-Creativity-Routines-Systems-Spontaneity
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychology Review, 69, 220–232.
   Google Scholar
• Meso, P., & Smith, R. A. (2000). Resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 224–234.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy, S. K. (2008). Minding the cognition: Toward a strategic knowledge management for competitive advantage. Strategic Change Journal, 17, 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21, 241–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, T. (1998). Theory of innovative problem solving. The Bulletin of Cultural and Natural Sciences in Osaka. Gakuin University, 37, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Retrieved from http://ebn.bmj.com/content/18/2/34.full.pdf+html
   Google Scholar
• Oanda, I. O. (2013). The development of higher education in Africa: Prospects and challenges. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 21, 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2011). Patents and economic development in South Africa: Managing intellectual property rights. South African Journal of Science, 107, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. (2007). Managing invention and innovation. Research Technology Management, 50, 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, M., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Reality is our laboratory: Communities of practice in applied computer science. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinates of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 137, 580–607.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, M. (2007). The state of patenting in South Africa, special report. Pretoria, South Africa: Innovation Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Staats, A. W. (1968). Learning, language, and cognition: Theory, research, and method for the study of human behaviour and its development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, U. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 592–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, M., & Polt, W. (2017). The knowledge triangle between research, education and innovation: A conceptual discussion. Foresight and STI Governance, 11, 10–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. (2016). The process of innovation: A study of the origination and the development of ideas for new scientific instruments. Bloomington, IA: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organisational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Cultural, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. E. (2009). What is shared? A framework for understanding shared innovation within communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 215–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar