Flipped learning: An effective pedagogy with an Achilles’ heel

References

• Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades 1994–2014. Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13, 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford, M. R., & Chan, K. (2017). Refining a strategic marketing course: Is a ‘flip’ a good ‘fit’?. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25, 152–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2016). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. D. N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 563–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Political Strategy Centre. (2017). 10 trends transforming education as we know it. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., Perenyi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (forthcoming). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Journal of Active Learning in Higher Education. doi:10.1177/1469787418801702
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldin.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. M., Trolian, T. L., Paulsen, M. B., & Pascarella, E. T. (2016). Evaluating the influence of peer learning on psychological well-being. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59(Supplement C), 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F. (2008). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28, 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2017). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 398–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 536–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, B., Chipperfield, J., Dorsett, P., Del Fabbro, L., Frommolt, V., Goetz, S., … Rung, A. (2017). Flipped classroom experiences: Student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Education, 73, 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Cakitaki, B. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning – Especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., Line, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Bhattacharyya, A., Stratilas, K., & Goela, N. (2016). English language proficiency and learning among Australian international postgraduate accounting students. The International Journal of Learning, 18. Retrived from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2729640
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 581–605). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smallhorn, M. (2017). The flipped classroom: A learning model to increase student engagement not academic achievement. Student Success, 8, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demograhically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Foldnes, N. (2017). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23, 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., & Lee, W.-I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 713–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N. H., Quint, C., Norris, S. A., & Carr, T. (2015). Exploring flipped classroom instruction in Calculus III. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, A., Leddy, J. J., Mindra, S., Hughes, J. D. M., El-Bialy, S., & Ramnanan, C. J. (2016). Student perceptions of independent versus facilitated small group learning approaches to compressed medical anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, 40–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Sun, T. T., & Liu, Y. L. (2017). A bibliometric investigation of flipped classroom research during 2000–2015. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12, 178–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K. M., McKnight, K., & McKnight, P. (2014). Extension of a review of flipped learning. Retrived from https://flippedlearning.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Yuping, W., Xibin, H., & Juan, Y. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 380–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, R., Xiang, L. R., Yue, R. Z., Zeng, J., Wan, X. H., & Zuo, C. (2017). Friend or foe? Flipped classroom for undergraduate electrocardiogram learning: A randomized controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 17. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0881-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar