Enhancing students’ engagement with abstract ideas through conceptual and theoretical frameworks

References

• Anfara, V. A. (2008). Theoretical frameworks. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 870–873). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix, R. (1963). Concepts and generalizations in comparative sociological studies. American Sociological Review, 28, 532–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2013). Utility of a conceptual framework within doctoral study: A researcher’s reflections. Issues in Educational Research, 23, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J., & Smyth, R. (2015). Conceptual frameworks in the doctoral research process: A pedagogical model. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 52, 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies, 47, 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015). Novices’ struggles with conceptual and theoretical framing in writing dissertations and papers for publication. Publications, 3, 104–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G., & Lunt, I. (2014). The concept of ‘originality’in the Ph. D.: How is it interpreted by examiners? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 803–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. K., & Harland, T. (2018). Higher education research methodology: A step-by-step guide to the research process. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, C. D. (1999). A theoretical framework: The central piece of a research plan. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (1999). What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31, 357–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation: Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., & Fairbairn, H. (2015). Examiner reference to theory in PhD theses. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 52, 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a concept, that a person may grasp it? Mind & Language, 4, 68–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2015). ‘I didn’t have a clue what they were talking about’: PhD candidates and theory. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 52, 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research Development, 28, 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 593–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 44, 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. (1997). Social theory as a vocation. Perspectives, 19, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E. (2007). Making th implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary of English (Ed.). (2015). Abstraction (3rd ed.). Online edition.
   Google Scholar
• Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for concept analysis. In G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 15–85). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2007). A guide to understanding theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Evidence-Based Midwifery, 5, 39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. A. (2009). The plurality of concepts. Synthese, 169, 145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiarda, H. (Ed). (2010). Grand theories and ideologies in the social sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar