Enhancement of learning & teaching practices in a challenging context: Evaluating the outcomes of a refreshed peer supported review process

References

• Akalu, G. (2016). Higher education ‘massification’ and challenges to the professoriate: Do academics’ conceptions of quality matter? Quality in Higher Education, 22, 260–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, V. (2009). Enhancing learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum in higher education. England: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Cannell, P., & Gilmour, A. (2013). Staff: Enhancing teaching, Final project report. Scotland: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Crutchley, D., Nield, K., & Jordan, F. (2005). Moving on from peer observation of teaching. Educational Developments, 6, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Debowski, S. (2014). From agents of change to partners in arms: The emerging academic developer role. International Journal for Academic Development, 19, 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Di Napoli, R. (2014). Value gaming and political ontology: Between resistance and compliance in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19, 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Elassy, N. (2015). The concepts of quality, quality assurance and quality enhancement. Quality Assurance in Education, 23, 250–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, L. (2015). Whither teaching? Academics’ informal learning about teaching in the ‘tiger mother’ university. International Journal for Academic Development, 20, 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2005). Peer observation of teaching. SEDA Paper 118. Birmingham: SEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., & D’Andrea, V.-M. (2001). Quality development: A new concept for higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 7, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Handal, G., Hofgaard Lycke, K., Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., Skodvin, A., & Dyrdal Solbrekke, T. (2014). The role of academic developers in transforming Bologna regulations to a national and institutional context. International Journal for Academic Development, 19, 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hazlett, D., & Platt, A. (2018). Reflections from a centre for academic development in a shifting context. In E. Roger (Ed.), Handbook of quality assurance for university teaching (2nd ed., pp. 371–381). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. (2013). The marketization of education is destroying our universities. Centre for Labour and Class Studies. Retrieved from http://classonline.org.uk/blog/item/the-marketisation-of-education-is-destroying-our-universities
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P., & Trowler, P. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S. (2009). University of Ulster – Peer supported review. In D. Gosling & K. M. O'Connor (Eds.), Beyond peer observation of teaching (pp. 47–52). SEDA Paper 124. London: SEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K. (2014). Influencing teaching and learning microcultures - Academic development in a research-intensive university. Doctoral Dissertation. Lund, Sweden: Lund University. 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 51–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., Shankar, A., & Veer, E. (2011). The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 1142–1162.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, A., & Floyd, S. (2015). Preparing for the UKPSF at Ulster: An exploration of the role the academic manager plays in engaging and supporting staff preparedness for professional recognition. SEDA Educational Developments, 16, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2011). Understanding strong academic micro-cultures – An exploratory study. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Taylor, R. (2003). Performance indicators in academia: An x-efficiency approach? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardi, I. (2011). The changing relationship between the Scholarship of Teaching (and Learning) and universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2016). Quality assurance and quality enhancement: Is there a relationship? Quality in Higher Education, 22, 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O.H. (2001, April). Humboldt meets market forces – A narrative approach to academic work. Paper presented at the Higher Education Close Up Conference 2. Lancaster University, Lancaster UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O.H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45, 307–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education: Questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 697–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar